This article explores cooperative learning in choral conducting education. The five characteristics of cooperative learning identified by Adams and Hamm ((1996). Cooperative learning: Critical thinking and collaboration across the curriculum (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas Publishers): positive interdependence; face-to-face interaction; individual accountability and personal responsibility for reaching groups goals; frequent practice with small-group interpersonal skills; and regular group processing and reflection have been used to structure the discussion on the learners’ perception of their development and their module’s effectiveness. The context in focus was an elective module on choral conducting education at master’s level. Cooperative learning in choral conducting education was shown to support the learners’ motivation for active participation in the teaching and learning process; to increase respect for diversity; to support the learners’ development of interpersonal, communication, leadership and teaching skills at both an individual and at a collective level; and to improve teacher effectiveness.
AdamsD.HammM. (1996). Cooperative learning: Critical thinking and collaboration across the curriculum (2nd ed.). Springflied, IL: Charles Thomas Publishers.
2.
ApfelstadtH. (1997). Applying leadership models in teaching choral conductors. Choral Journal of the American Choral Directors’ Association, 37, 23–30.
3.
ApfelstadtH. (2000). First things first: Selecting the repertoire. Music Educators Journal, 87, 19–22, 46.
4.
BartleetB. L.HultgrenR. (2008). Sharing the podium: exploring the process of peer learning in professional conducting. British Journal of Music Education, 25, 193–206.
5.
BiggsJ. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
6.
BriggsR. (2000). Vocal warm-ups: From the sublime to the ridiculous. Teaching Music, 7, 36–39.
7.
BrunnerD. (1996). Carefully crafting the choral rehearsal. Music Educators Journal, 83, 37–39.
8.
ButkeM. A. (2006). Reflection on practice: A study of five choral educators’ reflective journeys. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 25, 57–69.
9.
ByoJ. L. (1990). Recognition of intensity contrasts in the gestures of beginning conductors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 157–163.
10.
CollinsA.BrownJ. S.NewmanS. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In ResnickL. B. (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction - Essays in honour of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
11.
CooperP.McIntyreD. (1993). Commonality in teachers’ and pupils’ perceptions of effective classroom learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 381–399.
12.
DurrantC. (1999). It’s not what you do, it’s the way you do it: A study of encounter between choral conductor and singer. Paper presented at the Sharing the Voices: The phenomenon of singing. St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada.
13.
DurrantC. (2003). Choral conducting: philosophy and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
DurrantC.VarvarigouM. (2008). Real time and virtual: Tracking the professional development and reflections of choral conductors. Reflecting Education Journal, 4, 72–80.
15.
FalchikovN. (2001). Learning together - Peer tutoring in higher education. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge-Falmer.
16.
FreerP. (2009). Focus on scaffolding language and sequential units during choral instruction. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 28, 33–40.
17.
FuelberthR. J. V. (2003). The effect of conducting gesture on singers’ perception of inappropriate vocal tension. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 1, 13–21.
18.
FuelberthR. J. V. (2004). The effects of various left hand conducting gestures on perception of anticipated vocal tension in singers. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 2, 27–38.
19.
GauntH. (2006). Student and teacher perceptions of one-to-one instrumental and vocal tuition in a conservatoire. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of London, London.
20.
GoetzeM.CooperN.BrownC. (1990). Recent research on singing in the general music classroom. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 104, 16–37.
21.
GriffithsS. (2009). Teaching and learning in small groups. In FryH.KetteridgeS.MarshallS. (Eds.), A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education - Enhancing academic practice (pp. 72–84). New York, NY and London, UK: Routledge.
22.
GrimlandF. (2005). Characteristics of teacher-directed modeling in high school choral rehearsals. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 24, 5–14.
23.
GummA. J. (2007). Using a generic students opinion survey to evaluate college conductors: Investigation of validity, dimensionality and variability. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 171, 37–50.
24.
IllerisK. (2007). How we learn - Learning and non-learning in school and beyond. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
JaquesD. (2000). Learning in groups. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
26.
JohnstonH. (1993). The use of self-assessment, peer-assessment, and instructor feedback in evaluating conducting skills in msuic student teachers. British Journal of Music Education, 10, 57–63.
27.
HarrisonS.O’BryanJ.LeblerD. (2013). Playing it like a professional: Approaches to ensemble direction in tertiary institutions. International Journal of Music Education, 31, 173–189.
28.
KnealeP. (2009). Teaching and learning for employability: Knowledge is not the only outcome. In FryH.KetteridgeS.MarshallS. (Eds.), A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education - Enhancing academic practice (pp. 99–112). New York, NY and London, UK: Routledge.
29.
LangnessA. (2000). Helping children’s voices develop in general music education. In ThurmanL.WelchG. F. (Eds.), Bodymind and voice: Foundation of voice education (Revised Edition, Vol. 5, pp. 803–813). Iowa City, IA: National Centre for Voice and Speech.
30.
LaslettP. (1989). A fresh map of life: The emergence of the Third age. London, UK: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
31.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning as legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
LeglarM.CollayM. (2002). Research by teachers on teacher education. In The new handbook of research in music teaching and learning (pp. 855–873). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
MadsenC. K. (1990). Teacher intensity in relation to music education. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 104, 38–46.
34.
MooreA. (2000). Teaching and learning: Pedagogy, curriculum and culture. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
35.
NapolesJ. (2008). Relationships among instructor, peer and self-evaluations of undergraduate music education majors’ micro-teaching experiences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 82–91.
36.
PersellinD. (2000). The importance of high-quality literature. Music Educators Journal, 87, 17–18.
Polifonia Working Group (2010). Instrumental and vocal teacher education: European perspectives. In Polifonia Working Group for instrumental and vocal music teacher training. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: AEC Publications
39.
ReamesR. (2001). High school choral directors descriptions of appropriate literature for beginning high school choirs. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 122–135.
40.
RuoccoJ. (2008). Leading from the front - The evaluation of a ‘Sing Up’ project. Unpublished MA thesis University of Roehampton, London.
41.
SchonD. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
42.
ScottD. (1996). Visual diagnostic skills’ development and college students’ acquisition of basic conducting skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 229–239.
43.
StamerR. A. (2009). Choral student perceptions of effective motivation strategies. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 28, 25–32.
44.
VarvarigouM. (2009). Modelling effective choral conducting education through an exploration of example teaching and learning in England. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Institute of Education, London.
45.
VarvarigouM.DurrantC. (2010). Theoretical perspectives on the education of choral conductors: A suggested framework. British Journal of Music Education, 28, 325–338.
46.
YarbroughC. (1987). The relationship of behavioural self-assessment and achievement of basic conducting skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 183–189.
47.
YarbroughC.MadsenC. K. (1998). The evaluation of teaching in choral rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 134–146.
48.
ZielinskiR. (2005). The performance pyramid: Building blocks for a successful choral performance. Music Educators Journal, 92, 44–49.
