The present study was designed to pilot test an adjusted version of a questionnaire, used in earlier studies with college music students, to determine opinions of college music faculty on the topic of private lesson teaching. Full-time tenure-track college music faculty, with primary appointments in applied music at two universities in the United States, were contacted for the project. Thirty-two of 51 completed the task with no negative comments about the format, focus or specific questions in the instrument. Results were similar in many ways to previous student responses, and this group felt strongly that they liked teaching, training for teaching is important, and that their applied music lesson students would likely teach someday themselves. They enjoyed talking about pedagogical issues with students and liked the challenges of teaching musicians. Future research with this instrument should focus on larger groups with delineations in specialty area, faculty appointment, institution type/size, teaching assignment, and global representation.
BennettD.StanbergA. (2006). Musicians as teachers: Developing a positive view through collaborative learning partnerships. International Journal of Music Education, 24(3), 219–230.
2.
ByoJ. L.CassidyJ. W. (2008). An exploratory study of time use in the practice of music majors. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 27(1), 33–40.
3.
CarruthersG. (2008). Educating professional musicians: Lessons learned from school music. International Journal of Music Education, 26(2), 127–135.
4.
CashC. D. (2009). Effects of early and late rest intervals on performance and overnight consolidation of a keyboard sequence. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 252–266.
5.
CiorbaC. R.SmithN. Y. (2009). Measurement of instrumental and vocal undergraduate performance juries using a multidimensional assessment rubric. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 5–15.
6.
DukeR. A. (1999/2000). Measures of instructional effectiveness in music research. Bulletin for the Council of Research in Music Education, 143, 1–48.
7.
DukeR. A.FlowersP. J.WolfeD. E. (1997). Children who study piano with excellent teachers in the United States. Bulletin for the Council of Research in Music Education, 132, 51–84.
8.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L. (2006). The nature of expertise: Narrative descriptions of 19 common elements observed in the lessons of three renowned artist-teachers. Bulletin for the Council of Research in Music Education, 170, 7–19.
9.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L.CashC. D. (2009). It’s not how much; it’s how: Characteristics of practice behavior and retention of performance skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 310–321.
10.
FredricksonW. E. (2007a). Music majors’ attitudes toward private lesson teaching after graduation: A replication and extension. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 326–343.
11.
FredricksonW. E. (2007b). Perceptions of college-level music performance majors teaching applied music lessons to young students. International Journal of Music Education, 25(1), 72–81.
12.
FredricksonW. E.BrittinR. V. (2009). Undergraduate music performance majors’ attitudes toward private lesson teaching after graduation: A replication. Southern Music Education Journal, 4(1): 14–29.
13.
FredricksonW. E.McCabeM. C. (2007). Music faculty positions in higher education: An analysis of the College Music Society Music Faculty Vacancy List for the 2003–2004 school year. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 174, 45–59.
14.
HenningerJ. C.FlowersP. J.CouncillK. H. (2006). Pedagogical techniques and student outcomes in applied instrumental lessons taught by experienced and pre-service American music teachers. International Journal of Music Education, 24(1), 71–84.
15.
MadsenC. K. (1988). Senior Researcher Award acceptance address. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 133–139.
16.
MadsenC. K. (2004). A 30-year follow-up study of actual applied music practice versus estimated practice. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 77–88.
17.
MadsenC. K.KellyS. N. (2002). First remembrances of wanting to become a music teacher. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 323–332.
18.
McPhersonG. E. (2000/2001). Commitment and practice: Key ingredients for achievement during the early stages of learning a musical instrument. Bulletin for the Council of Research in Music Education, 147, 122–127.
19.
MillsJ. (2004). Conservatoire students as instrumental teachers. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 161/162, 145–153.
20.
MillsJ. (2007). Instrumental teaching. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
National Association of Schools of Music. (2009). Handbook 2009–2010. Reston, VA: National Association of Schools of Music.
22.
OdenaO.WelchG. (2007). The influence of teachers’ backgrounds on their perceptions of musical creativity: A qualitative study with secondary school music teachers. Research Studies in Music Education, 28(1), 71–81.
23.
ParkesK. (2008). The effect of grading instruction on college applied faculty perceptions about grading. Bulletin for the Council of Research in Music Education, 177, 79–89.
24.
PittsS. E.DavidsonJ. W.McPhersonG. E. (2000). Models of success and failure in instrumental learning: Case studies of young players in the first 20 months of learning. Bulletin for the Council of Research in Music Education, 146, 51–69.
25.
RifeN. A.ShnekZ. M.LaubyJ. L.LapidusL. B. (2001). Children’s satisfaction with private music lessons. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 21–32.
26.
WardV. (2004). The performance teacher as music analyst: A case study. International Journal of Music Education, 22(3), 248–265.
27.
WestT.RostvallA. L. (2003). A study of interaction and learning in instrumental teaching. International Journal of Music Education, 40, 16–27.
