In this paper I examine the music learning and teaching in the Banjo Hangout online music community (www.banjohangout.org/) using cyber ethnographic methods of interview and participant observation conducted entirely through computer-mediated communication, which includes Skype and written narrative texts – forum posts, email, chat room conversations – along with hyperlinks to YouTube and other Internet music-learning resources. The Hangout is an example of an online community based on the pre-existing offline interests of its founding members and it is thus connected to and overlaps with the offline Old Time and Bluegrass music banjo communities. Although I focus on the Banjo Hangout online community, this study also provides peripheral glimpses – embedded in the participants’ narratives – into the offline Old Time and Bluegrass banjo communities of practice. As a cyber ethnographic field study, this research also highlights the epistemological differences between on- and offline community as reflected in music education online narrative qualitative research and research practice.
AdlerT. A. (1979). The acquisition of a traditional competence: Folk-musical and folk-cultural learning among bluegrass banjo players. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, USA.
2.
AnN. (2007). Cybercultures from the east: Japanese rock music fans in North America. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Carleton University, USA.
3.
AtayA. (2009). Identities in motion: Cyberspace and diasporic queer male bodies in the context of globalization. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Illinois, USA.
4.
BakerP. M.WardA. C. (2002). Bridging temporal and spatial ‘gaps’: The role of information and communication technologies in defining communities. Information, Communication & Society, 5(2), 207–224.
5.
BryantW. (1995). Virtual music communities: The folk-music internet discussion group as a cultural system. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of California-Los Angeles, USA.
6.
BurgessJ.GreenJ. (2009). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
7.
CherjovskyN. (2010). Virtual hood: Exploring the hip-hop culture experience in a British online community. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Central Florida, USA.
DerechoA. T. (2008) Illegitimate media: Race, gender and censorship in digital remix culture. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University, USA.
10.
DyckJ. (2008). Blogging music: Indian musicians and online musical spaces. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Alberta, Canada.
11.
ElliottL. (2004). Goa trance and the practice of community in the age of the internet. Television & New Media, 5(3), 272–288.
FarrugiaR. L. (2004). Spin-sters: Women, new media technologies and electronic/dance music. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Iowa, USA.
14.
FontD. (2007). Alan Lomax’s iPod? Smithsonian global sound and applied ethnomusicology on the internet. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
15.
HarveyT. (2009). Virtual garage bands: Collaborative cybercommunities of Internet musicians. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Florida State University, USA.
16.
HayesK. (2008). The influence of family in the preservation of Appalachian traditional music: From the front porch to performance. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Wright State University, USA.
HineC. (2005). Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the internet. New York, NY: Berg.
19.
JamesN.BusherB. (2009). Online interviewing. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
20.
JonesS. G.KuckerS. (2001). Computers, the internet, and virtual cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
KitvitsJ. (2005). Online interviewing and the research relationship. In HineC. (Ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the internet (pp. 35–50). New York, NY: Berg.
22.
LizieA. (2000). Community and identity in cyberspace: Popular music and the international flow of information. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Temple University, USA.
23.
LysloffR. T. (2003). Musical community on the internet: An on-line ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 18(2), 233–263.
24.
McNeilB. (2010). Building subcultural community online and off: An ethnographic analysis of the CBLocals music scene. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, USA.
25.
NieckarzP. P. (2005). Community in cyber space? The role of the internet in facilitating and maintaining a community of live music collecting and trading. City & Community, 4(4), 403–423.
26.
PutnamR. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.
27.
OrgadS. (2005). From online to offline and back: Moving from online to offline relationships with research informants. In HineC. (Ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the internet (pp. 51–66). New York, NY: Berg.
28.
RamaprasadJ. (2009). Online social influence and consumer choice: Evidence from the music industry. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Irvine, USA.
RudolphT.FrankelJ. (2009). YouTube in music education. Milwaukee WI: Hal Leonard.
31.
SalavuoM. (2006). Open and informal online communities as forums of collaborative musical activities and learning. British Journal of Music Education, 23(3), 253–271.
32.
SalavuoM. (2008). Social media as an opportunity for pedagogical change in music education. Journal of Music, Education, and Technology, 1(2), 121–136.
33.
SalavuoM.HakkinenP. (2005). Informal online communites as music learning environments. Case: milkseri.net. Musiikki, 1(2), 112–138.
34.
SaldanaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
ScullyF. S. (2005). American folk music revivalism, 1965–2005. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at Austin, USA.
36.
SeegerP. (1969). How to play the five-string banjo. New York, NY: Music Sales Corporation.
37.
SilversM. B. (2007). Musical creation, reception, and consumption in a virtual place. (Unpublished master’s thesis). The University of Arizona, USA.
38.
StokesC. E. (2004). Representin’ in cyberspace: Sexuality, hip hop, and self-definition in home pages constructed by black adolescent girls in the HIV/AIDS era. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, USA.
39.
TurinoT. T. (2008). Music as social life: The politics of participation. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
40.
VeblenK.WaldronJ. (in press). Fast forward: Emerging trends in community music. In MacPhersonG.WelchG. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
WaldronJ. (2009). Examining the old time virtual music ‘community of practice’: Informal music learning on the internet. The Journal of Music, Education, and Technology, 2(2–3), 97–112.
WaldronJ. (2011). Locating narratives in postmodern spaces: A cyber ethnographic field study of informal music learning in online community. Action, Criticism, and Theory in Music Education, 10(2), 31–59.
WaldronJ.VeblenK. (2008). The medium is the message: Cyberspace, community and music learning in the Irish traditional music virtual community. Journal of Music, Education, and Technology, 1(2), 99–111.
47.
WellmanB.Quan-HaaseA.WitteJ.HamptonK. (2001). Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. The American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436–455.
48.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and doing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
49.
WengerE.WhiteN.SmithJ. (2009). Digital habitats: Stewarding technology for communities. Portland, OR: CPsquare.
