This study was designed to investigate aesthetic responses of music major listeners to gradual tempo changes in orchestral music. Seventy-two graduate and undergraduate participants listened to a recording of the first movement of Haydn's Symphony #104 and indicated aesthetic responses during the presentation using a CRDI dial. One group listened to an unaltered version of the excerpt. A second group heard a version that slowly increased in tempo to a maximum of 20 percent above the original tempo, and a third group heard a version that gradually decreased in tempo to 20 percent below the original. Although the overall contour of responses was similar for all listening conditions, the tempo increase group indicated slightly higher levels of aesthetic response during the latter part of the movement than did the unaltered and tempo decrease groups. None of the listeners in the tempo change groups clearly identified the nature of the change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsB. L. (1994). The effect of visual/aural conditions on the emotional response to music. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
2.
AielloR. (Ed.), with J. A. Sloboda (1994). Musical perceptions.New York: Oxford University Press.
BerlyneD. E. (Ed.). (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation.New York: Halsted Press.
5.
BrittinR. V. (1992). Perceptions of conducting: accuracy in detecting modulated beat.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 113, 1-8.
6.
BurnsedV., & SochinskiJ. (2001). The relationship between dynamics and tension in Haydn's Symphony 104: a developmental study.Psychomusicology, 17(1/2), 19-35.
7.
ByrnesS. R. (1997). Different-age and mentally handicapped listeners’ response to Western art music selections.Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 568-579.
8.
CapperellaD. A. (1989). Reliability of the continuous response digital interface for data collection in a study of auditory perception.Southeastern Journal of Music Education, 1, 19-32.
9.
DrakeA. H. (1968). An experimental study of selected variables in the performance of musical durational notation.Journal of Research in Music Education, 16, 329-338.
10.
DukeR. A. (1989). Effect of melodic rhythm on elementary students’ and college undergraduates’ perception of relative tempo.Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 246-257.
11.
DukeR. A., GeringerJ. M., & MadsenC. K. (1988). The effect of tempo on pitch perception.Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 108-125.
12.
DukeR. A., GeringerJ. M., & MadsenC. K. (1991). Performance of perceived beat in relation to age and music training.Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 35-45.
13.
FlowersP. J. (1983). The effect of instruction in vocabulary and listening on nonmusicians’ descriptions of changes in music.Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 179-189.
14.
FlowersP. J. (1984). Attention to elements of music and effect of instruction in vocabulary on written descriptions of music by children and undergraduates.Psychology of Music, 12, 167-174.
15.
FlowersP. J. (2001). Patterns of attention in music listening.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 148, 48-59.
16.
FredricksonW. E. (1997). Elementary, middle, and high school student perceptions of tension in music.Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 626-635.
17.
GeringerJ. M. (1995). Continuous loudness judgments of dynamics in recorded music excerpts.Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 22-35.
18.
GeringerJ. M., DukeR. A., & MadsenC. K. (1992). Musicians’ perception of beat note: Regions of beat change in modulating tempos.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 114, 21-33.
19.
GeringerJ. M., & MadsenC. K. (1981). Verbal and operant discrimination/preference for tone quality and intonation.Psychology of Music, 9, 26-30.
20.
GeringerJ. M., & MadsenC. K. (1984). Pitch and tempo discrimination in recorded orchestral music among musicians and nonmusicians.Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 195-204.
21.
GeringerJ. M., & MadsenC. K. (1987). Pitch and tempo discrimination in recorded popular music. In MadsenC. K., & PrickettC. A. (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 204-212). Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
22.
GeringerJ. M., & MadsenC. K. (1989). Pitch and tone quality discrimination and preference: Evidence for a hierarchical model of musical elements.Canadian Music Educator: Special Research Edition, 30, 29-38.
23.
GeringerJ. M., & MadsenC. K. (1995/1996). Focus of attention to elements: Listening patterns of musicians and nonmusicians.Bulletin of the Council of Research in Music Education, 127, 80-87.
24.
GeringerJ. M., MadsenC. K., & DukeR. A. (1993). Perception of beat note change in modulating tempos.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 119, 49-57.
25.
GregoryD. (1989). Using computers to measure continuous music responses.Psychomusicology, 8, 127-134.
26.
HareF. G. (1977). Dimensions of music perception.Scientific Aesthetics, 1, 271-280.
27.
HargreavesD. J. (1986). The developmental psychology of music.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
HevnerK. (1936). Experimental studies of the elements of expression in music.American Journal of Psychology, 48, 248-268.
29.
JohnsonC. M. (1996). Musicians’ and nonmusicians’ assessment of perceived rubato inmusical performance.Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 84-96.
30.
KillianJ. N. (1985). The effect of differential feedback on tempo performance and perception.Contributions to Music Education, 12, 22-30.
31.
KuhnT. L. (1974). Effects of dynamics, halves of exercise, and trial sequences on tempo accuracy.Journal of Research in Music Education, 22, 270-277.
32.
KuhnT. L. (1977). Discrimination of modulated beat tempo by professional musicians.Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 222-227.
33.
KuhnT. L. (1987). The effect of tempo, meter, and melodic complexity on the perception of tempo. In MadsenC. K., and PrickettC. A. (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 165-174). Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
34.
LeBlancA. (1981). Effects of style, tempo, and performing medium on children's music preference.Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 143-156.
35.
LeBlancA., & McCraryJ. (1983). Effect of tempo on children's music preference.Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 283-294.
36.
LychnerJ. A. (1998). An empirical study concerning terminology relating to aesthetic response to music.Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 303-319.
37.
MadsenC. K. (1979). Modulated beat discrimination among musicians and nonmusicians.Journal of Research in Music Education, 27, 57-67.
38.
MadsenC. K. (1990) Measuring musical response.Music Educators Journal, 77(3), 26-28.
39.
MadsenC. K. (1997). Focus of attention and aesthetic response.Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 80-89.
40.
MadsenC. K. (1998). Emotion versus tension in Haydn's Symphony no. 104 as measured by the two-dimensional continuous response digital interface.Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 546-554.
41.
MadsenC. K., BrittinR. V., & Capperella-SheldonD. A. (1993). An empirical investigation of the aesthetic response to music.Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 57-69.
42.
MadsenC. K., ByrnesS. R., Capperella-SheldonD. A. & BrittinR. V. (1993). Aesthetic responses to music: Musicians vs. nonmusicians.Journal of Music Therapy, 30, 174-191.
43.
MadsenC. K., DukeR. A., & GeringerJ. M. (1984). Pitch and tempo discrimination in recorded band music among wind and percussion musicians.Journal of Band Research, 20(1), 20-29.
44.
MadsenC. K., DukeR. A., & GeringerJ. M. (1986). The effect of speed alterations on tempo note selection.Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 101-110.
45.
MadsenC. K., & FredricksonW. E. (1993). The experience of musical tension: A replication of Nielsen's research using the continuous response digital interface.Journal of Music Therapy, 30, 46-57.
46.
MadsenC. K., & GeringerJ. M. (1981). The effect of a distraction index on improving practice attentiveness and musical performance.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 66-67, 46-52.
47.
MadsenC. K., & GeringerJ. M. (1990). Differential patterns of music listening: Focus of attention of musicians versus nonmusicians.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 105, 45-47.
48.
MadsenC. K., & GeringerJ. M. (2001). A focus of attention model for meaningful listening.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 147, 103-108.
49.
MadsenC. K., GeringerJ. M., & FredricksonW. E. (1997). Focus of attention to musical elements in Haydn's Symphony #104.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 133, 57-63.
50.
MadsenC. K., & KuhnT. L. (1993). Contemporary music education (2nd ed.). Raleigh, NC: Contemporary Publishing.
51.
MadsenC. K., & WolfeD. E. (1979). The effect of interrupted music and incompatible responses on bodily movement and music attentiveness.Journal of Music Therapy, 16, 17-30.
52.
MontgomeryB. (1978). Basic aural discrimination: Third grade children's perception of changes in music. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
53.
NielsenF. V. (1987). Musical ‘tension’ and related concepts. In SebeokT. A., and Umiker-SebeokJ. (Eds.). The semiotic web ‘86. An international yearbook (pp. 491-514). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
54.
NielzenS., & CesarekZ. (1982). Emotional experience of music as a function of musical structure.Psychology of Music, 10, 7-17.
55.
RussellP. A. (1986). Experimental aesthetics of popular music recordings: Pleasingness, familiarity and chart performance.Psychology of Music, 14, 33-43.
56.
SheldonD. A. (1994). Effects of tempo, musical experience, and listening modes on tempo modulation perception.Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 190-202.
57.
SheldonD. A., & GregoryD. (1997). Perception of tempo modulation by listeners of different levels of educational experience.Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 367-379.
58.
SlobodaJ. A. (1991). Music structure and emotional response: Some empirical findings.Psychology of Music, 19, 110-120.
59.
WangC. C., & SalzbergR. S. (1984). Discrimination of modulated music tempo by string students.Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 123-131.
60.
WapnickJ. (1980). Pitch, tempo, and timbrai preferences in recorded piano music.Journal of Research in Music Education, 28, 43-58.
61.
YarbroughC. (1987). The effect of music excerpts on tempo discriminations and preferences of musicians and non-musicians. In MadsenC. K., and PrickettC. A. (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 175-189). Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
