Abstract
Lay sources contend that the narcissistic abuse cycle occurs in many relationships and inflicts serious psychological harm. However, the phenomenon has scant mention in academic literature. Researchers should refine its definition, boundaries, characteristics, and management. Clinicians should be vigilant about its presence and employ interventions proven effective in similar conditions.
Keywords
The abuse in some relationships is said to follow a cyclical pattern called the narcissistic abuse cycle (NAC). Its stages are idealization, devaluation, discard, and re-entering (Table 1). 1 The NAC is not restricted to romantic or marital relationships and can occur among friends, colleagues, or family members, too. 2 It is a distinct form of interpersonal trauma in which methods of emotional abuse, such as gaslighting (Table 1), are heavily used.
Stages of the Narcissistic Abuse Cycle and Their Characteristics.
Though widely discussed in social media, therapist websites, and popular psychology books, NAC has scant presence in academic literature (while a Facebook page on the topic has 124,000 followers, illustrating massive public interest in the subject, 3 a PubMed search for the phrase on 13 August 2025 returned only one result). However, several people have shared online accounts of experiencing NAC. 1 In-depth interviews of 20 such women revealed that all were on treatment for depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and other conditions. 1 A narrative review concluded that recipients of narcissistic abuse (NA), whose definition in the article matched the descriptions of NAC, may face PTSD, complex PTSD, severe depression, or suicide. 2 In a study, those in close personal relationships (n = 436) with persons high in narcissistic traits had excessive anxiety, depression, somatic concerns, and other related symptoms. 4 In view of the rampant online revelations and the psychological consequences documented in preliminary research, the academic community should test the validity of the construct, examine its nuances, develop preventive and therapeutic measures, and provide evidence-supported information to the public. Notably, conditions such as complex PTSD and gaming disorder were initially actively discussed online before researchers and, subsequently, diagnostic systems took them up.
Relevance
The Narcissistic Abuse Cycle Has Differences from Other Models of Abuse
Walker’s cycle of abuse 5 has physical violence as a central feature and may not involve the perpetrator’s overt charm. In coercive control, 6 a broader range of tactics, including financial control, are employed consistently, without cyclicity. In an unpublished dissertation, 7 semi-structured interviews of six women whose ex-partners had features of narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) revealed some differences between NA and other types of abuse or domestic violence: The perpetrator created a false persona at the relationship’s beginning and adopted negative behaviors later only. Also, NA had less emphasis on physical abuse and high levels and frequency of psychological manipulation. Differentiating from other types of abuse is relevant because in NAC, the recipient’s attitudes and behaviors also contribute to the maintenance of the cycle and can be intervention targets.
On the other hand, some of the terms used online to describe NAC, have supporting literature: Trauma bonding is similar to Stockholm syndrome. 2 A recent systematic review comprehensively discussed gaslighting. 8
Toward a Definition
The NAC has no standardized definition. What Howard et al. 2 present as a definition of NA comes close to the online descriptions of NAC: “Emotional and psychological abuse within adult-to-adult relationships which follows a cycle of behavior and contains particular characteristics.” Further research is required to formulate and validate a more precise definition. For example, the definition should specify the “particular characteristics” of the various stages of the abuse.
Apart from the characteristics of the abuse, the perpetrator also requires an operational definition. Is the behavior exhibited by all three types (i.e., grandiose, vulnerable, and combined) in the spectrum Campbell and Crist 9 proposed, and if yes, do their approaches to the recipients differ? Is the behavior exhibited by those with NPD or traits only, or by those with other Cluster B disorders too? According to the Cambridge dictionary, “narcissist” means “someone who has too much admiration for himself or herself.” This may be the meaning intended in the online survivor narratives; profiles of those who meet NPD criteria may be disparate. The approach adopted by previous researchers, 4 of profiling perpetrators by administering the Pathological Narcissism Inventory (caregiver version) 10 to recipients, may be inadequate. Finetuning the definition of NAC might require moving beyond diagnostic labels and adopting a transdiagnostic lens to clarify the dyadic interaction (e.g., focusing on traits such as low empathy and high manipulativeness).
A definition of NAC should also distinguish it from NA, which, similar to NAC, is widely discussed in lay media and online platforms and has been assessed in some studies11,12 but lacks a standard definition. One possibility, which needs evaluation, is that NAC ensues when NA follows a cyclical pattern.
Other Research Gaps
The cycle and its components need validation, using mixed-methods approaches, across clinical, community, and online samples. The only available study reported an additional stage of “recipient’s infatuation” between idealization and devaluation. 1 Clarity is needed on whether the online depictions serve as self-fulfilling prophecies influencing the actions of perpetrators or recipients: Mercer 13 argues that people entering psychodynamic psychotherapy influenced by “reductive” social media narratives might harbor a confirmation bias that can hurt the therapeutic process.
Treatment studies are lacking. Women survivors of NA reported that their healing involved destroying the perpetrator’s image they had constructed in the idealization phase. 1 For Egyptian women abused in narcissistic relationships, social networks and spirituality were the most frequent resilience sources. 14 Interventions effective in trauma, such as trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy, need evaluation in NAC.
Interim Clinical Guidance
Till quality research emerges, clinicians should help recipients identify and label NAC (judiciously, till the concept is empirically validated). Acknowledging and validating their experiences can help (a) change negative perceptions of themselves and their situation and (b) understand that their psychological challenges stem from the abuse and not their intrinsic flaws. 1 Psycho-educating about projective identification that underlies the abuse can help them make sense of the abuse and its impacts. A strengths-based approach (identifying their current situation, what they have achieved and enjoyed before, and possible future aims) may further help regain the sense of self. 2 Acceptance skills such as cognitive defusion and grounding techniques may help create a distance from the fused thoughts.
Management strategies for each stage can include safety planning and emotional support during devaluation; crisis intervention and coping skills training during discard; and motivational interviewing, relapse prevention training, and boundary-setting during re-entry. Publishing case reports of what worked and what did not would help researchers plan intervention studies.
Clinicians should look for exposure to NAC in patients with depression, addictions, suicide attempts, or relationship issues, especially if the history indicates any of its components. Remember that the perpetrator may adopt pathological lying to show themselves in a positive light (e.g., portray a caring image of themselves) and gaslighting to exaggerate the recipient’s psychological difficulties (e.g., report “hypersensitivity” to “criticism”). 2
Conclusions
The NAC appears to be a prevalent cause of psychological morbidity. It requires clinical attention, remediation with interventions proven effective for similar conditions, and research to refine its definition, boundaries, characteristics, and management.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material for this article available online.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Declaration Regarding the Use of Generative AI
None used.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
