Abstract

Of all these issues, the effects of the closure of routine medical services on patients and caregivers have been tremendous. The patients on regular psychiatric care (follow-up visits, psychotherapy services, periodic/scheduled brain stimulation services, etc.) or requiring mental health care have been significantly affected.2–5 Moreover, at some places such as Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, considering the increase in the need for inpatient care, new acute inpatient units have been opened to cater to patients who have psychiatric disorders. These patients with various psychiatric disorders have additionally got infected with COVID-19 that is medically not serious, to the extent of admitting the person in infectious disease units or intensive care units. 6
Data from India also suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown have affected the mental health services significantly in both government and private sectors.7,8 There are also reports of private-sector health care staff getting infected due to the continuation of medical services, and subsequently, some of the health care workers (HCWs) facing legal actions too.9, 10 Recently, reports have emerged from different parts of the country about HCWs working in various institutes catering to patients with COVID-19 having got infected with the virus. 11
To overcome these issues, telemedicine and telepsychiatric services were started or resumed actively in many hospitals across the world. 12 Pre-existing guidelines were renewed and new telemedicine and telepsychiatric guidelines were formulated.13–15 India’s government too issued the Telemedicine Guidelines on the March 25, 2020, to ensure care to the needy patients. 14 However, there are many limitations of telemedicine services such as lack of the humane touch, being an indirect mode of communication, inability to carry out detailed physical examinations, difficulty in tele/internet connectivity in rural and difficult-to-access areas, lack of overall public acceptance, difficulty in diagnosing with accuracy and providing tele-psychotherapy services, issues related to confidentiality and security, etc.14, 16 Further, these may be out of reach for the poor and people who do not have a telephone. 17 Hence, in-person consultation will remain a preferred method of seeking professional help and need for inpatient care, and special treatment (e.g.,, electroconvulsive therapy, which will require direct contact with mental health professionals [MHPs]), cannot be underscored.
The recent studies on the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health outcomes of the general public and HCWs suggest that there has been a significant rise in the mental health morbidity, mostly common mental disorders, across the world.18–21 There is every possibility that MHPs would see an upsurge of the psychiatrically ill population shortly, that is, in the unlockdown phase, across the world. Further, at this moment, there is a steep rise in COVID-19 cases. It is said that there are many more undiagnosed asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic cases of COVID-19 for every diagnosed case.
In the post-lockdown/unlockdown phase, there is possibility of a flurry of new patients with psychiatric disorders and those experiencing a relapse of illness, coming for psychiatric consultations. Patients with mental illness have an added vulnerability to develop COVID-19 for several reasons such as difficulty following the infection control measures due to disturbed mental state, poor cognitive skills, and heightened risk due to the low immune response in chronically mentally ill persons. 22
MHPs will be facing an ethical dilemma of whether to see or not to see patients, as the unlockdown progresses, in the background of a rising number of cases of COVID-19. If someone decides to see the patients physically, they run the risk of getting infected; if they do not see the patients, they will go through the ethical dilemma and guilt.
Because of this, there is an urgent need to reorganize the services to practice safely. The reorganization of the services has to keep the HCWs’ and patients’ safety into account. A few authors have tried to put forth the essential case management practices amidst the pandemic about tele-case management, preparing for surge capacity, discharge planning, transitions of care, ethical and legal obligations, etc.23–25 Some of the authors have also discussed the necessity for expanding the roles and responsibilities of every specialty, ranging from pharmacy to public health, to reorganize the services back into the track. 26
In India, most of the health sector, especially in the government sector, does not work on the appointment basis—the patients can walk into the hospital at their own will. The government hospital outpatient services may get crowded with the unlocking and reopening of the services. There would also be a lot of pressure for admission to the inpatient units. Hence, if appropriate planning is not done, the outpatient and the inpatient settings themselves can become hotspots for the spread of infection, all the HCWs working in a particular unit getting infected, leading to complete closure of the services.
All these require planning and reorganizing the services both in the government and the private sectors. Reorganization of the services will be required in the form of working with appointments, reduction in the number of patients attending the services, minimization of the waiting time, and explicit instruction to the patients and caregivers concerning what will and will not be provided in the changed scenario (
Standard Procedures to Be Followed for Running the Mental Health Services
Required Changes in the Role of HCWs, Administrators/Supervisors, Teachers/Trainers and Trainees
While the imminent risk of getting an infection is high for the HCWs, the proposed reorganization of services can be taken as a template to minimize the risks. However, this model can be regarded as dynamic, and it can be changed as per the changing scenario of COVID-19 spread (containment zones/buffer zones/red hot spot zones, etc.) and based on the infrastructure of the healthcare set-up.
Various other strategies based on the patient catchment area of the hospital can be followed/developed. These include different departments developing standard operating procedures based on the number of cases they used to see in the pre-COVID era. There can be a partnership among the government sector hospitals as well as between the government and private sectors, for helping out in segregation and providing care to COVID and non-COVID patients. Some designated centers can be earmarked for admitting suspected COVID patients. It is also likely that in the future, there may be a need for having separate COVID wards for patients with mental illnesses, which have to be managed jointly by people from other specialties and MHPs. Hence, in cities and towns where there is more than one mental healthcare facility, MHPs need to reorganize the services so that some of the centers provide care to patients without COVID-19 and other centers provide care to those with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Once those suspected to have COVID-19 are cleared, they can be shifted to the place where people without COVID-19 are cared for. There is also a need to develop proper procedures and standard operating procedures for moving patients from one place to another. If these measures are not planned on time, we may soon see closure of services in some areas and HCWs getting infected. If such reorganization with a futuristic viewpoint to protect the people with mental disorders and MHPs is not undertaken, we may be heading for another disaster.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
