Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis from six comparative studies
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online October, 2022
Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis from six comparative studies
Lung sleeve resection is indicated for centrally located lung tumors, especially for patients who cannot tolerate pneumonectomy. With video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) being increasingly implemented for a wide variety of thoracic pathologies, this study aims to compare the intraoperative, postoperative, and long-term outcomes of VATS and open bronchial sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods
The MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched. Original clinical studies, comparing VATS and open sleeve lobectomy for NSCLC were included. Evidence was synthesized as odds ratios for categorical and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous variables.
Results
Our analysis included six studies with non-overlapping populations reporting on 655 patients undergoing bronchial sleeve lobectomy for NSCLC (229 VATS and 426 open). VATS sleeve lobectomy was associated with significantly longer operative time ((WMD): 45.85 min, 95% confidence interval (CI): 12.06 to 79.65, p = 0.01) but less intraoperative blood loss ((WMD): −34.57 mL, 95%CI: −58.35 to −10.78, p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between VATS and open bronchial sleeve lobectomy in margin-negative resection rate, number of lymph nodes resected, postoperative outcomes (drainage duration, length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality), postoperative complications (pneumonia, bronchopleural fistula/empyema, prolonged air leakage, chylothorax, pulmonary embolism, and arrhythmia), and long-term outcomes (overall survival, recurrence-free survival).
Conclusions
The limitation of our study arises mainly due to the heterogeneity of the included studies. Nevertheless, VATS bronchial sleeve lung resection constitutes a feasible and safe alternative to the open sleeve lung resection surgery for the management of centrally located lung tumors.
YamamotoKMiyamotoYOhsumiA, et al.Sleeve lung resection for lung cancer: analysis according to the type of procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2008; 136: 1349–1356.
2.
DylewskiMRLazzaroRS. Robotics-the answer to the Achilles’ heel of VATS pulmonary resection. Chinese J Cancer Res2012; 24: 259.
3.
XuXChenHYinW, et al.Thoracoscopic half carina resection and bronchial sleeve resection for central lung cancer. Surg Innov2014; 21: 481–486.
4.
Gómez-CaroAGarciaSReguartN, et al.Determining the appropriate sleeve lobectomy versus pneumonectomy ratio in central non-small cell lung cancer patients: an audit of an aggressive policy of pneumonectomy avoidance. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg2011; 39: 352–359.
5.
MauriziGD’AndrilliAAnileM, et al.Sleeve lobectomy compared with pneumonectomy after induction therapy for non–small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol2013; 8: 637–643.
6.
AnderssonSEMRaumaVHSSihvoEI, et al.Bronchial sleeve resection or pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of long-term results, survival and quality of life. J Thorac Dis2015; 7: 1742–1748.
7.
FergusonMKLehmanAG. Sleeve lobectomy or pneumonectomy: optimal management strategy using decision analysis techniques. Ann Thorac Surg2003; 76: 1782–1788.
8.
LimEBatchelorTJDunningJ, et al.Video-assisted thoracoscopic or open lobectomy in early-stage lung cancer. NEJM Evid2022; 1: 3.
9.
SwansonSJHerndonJED’AmicoTA, et al.Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802-a prospective, multi-institution feasibility study. J Clin Oncol2007; 25: 4993–4997.
10.
LiZChenWXiaM, et al.Sleeve lobectomy compared with pneumonectomy for operable centrally located non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Transl Lung Cancer Res2019; 8: 775–786.
11.
SoultanisKMChen ChaoMChenJ, et al.Technique and outcomes of 79 consecutive uniportal video-assisted sleeve lobectomies. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg2019; 56: 876–882.
12.
XieDDengJGonzalez-RivasD, et al.Comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with thoracotomy in bronchial sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non–small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2021; 161: 403–413.
13.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJ, et al.The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Br Med J2009; 339: b2700.
14.
WohlinC. Guidelines for Snowballing in Systematic Literature Studies and a Replication in Software Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE ‘14). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014: 1–10.
15.
SterneJAHernánMAReevesBC, et al.ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. Br Med J2016; 355: i4919.
16.
HozoSPDjulbegovicBHozoI. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol2005; 5: 13.
17.
WanXWangWLiuJ, et al.Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol2014; 14: 135.
18.
HigginsJGreenS. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
19.
SweetingMJSuttonAJLambertPC. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. Stat Med2004; 23: 1351–1375.
20.
TierneyJFStewartLAGhersiD, et al.Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials2007; 8: 16.
21.
DerSimonianRLairdN. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials1986; 7: 177–188.
22.
EggerMSmithGDSchneiderM, et al.Papers bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical testBr Med J1997; 315: 629–634.
23.
HigginsJPTThomasJChandlerJ, et al.Recommendations on testing for funnel plot asymmetry. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2nd Edition. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, 2019: 262–263.
24.
MayneNRDarlingAJRamanV, et al.Perioperative outcomes and 5-year survival after open versus thoracoscopic sleeve resection for lung cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2021; 33: 522–530.
25.
YangYMeiJLinF, et al.Comparison of the short- and long-term outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thoracotomy bronchial sleeve lobectomy for central lung cancer: a retrospective propensity score matched cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol2020; 27: 4384–4393.
26.
GaoHJJiangZHGongL, et al.Video-assisted vs thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy for lung cancer: a propensity matched analysis. Ann Thorac Surg2019; 108: 1072–1079.
27.
ZhouSPeiGHanY, et al.Sleeve lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer. J Cardiothorac Surg2015; 10: 116.
28.
WuLWangHCaiH, et al.Comparison of double sleeve lobectomy by uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy for nsclc treatment. Cancer Manag Res2019; 11: 10167–10174.
29.
QiuTZhaoYXuanY, et al.Robotic sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score-weighted comparison with thoracoscopic and open surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2020; 160: 838–846.
30.
KasedaSAokiTHangaiN, et al.Better pulmonary function and prognosis with video-assisted thoracic surgery than with thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg2000; 70: 1644–1646.
31.
McKenna JrRJHouckWFullerCB. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg2006; 81: 421–426.
32.
SantambrogioLCioffiUDe SimoneM, et al.Video-assisted sleeve lobectomy for mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the left lower lobar bronchus: a case report. Chest2002; 121: 635–636.
33.
HeJShaoWCaoC, et al.Long-term outcome of hybrid surgical approach of video-assisted minithoracotomy sleeve lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer. Surg Endosc2011; 25: 2509–2515.
34.
ZhongYWangYHuX, et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy. J Thorac Dis2020; 12: 5678–5690.
35.
DengHYQiuXMZhuDX, et al.Video-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg2021; 45: 897–906.
36.
ParissisHLeotsinidisMHughesA, et al.Comparative analysis and outcomes of sleeve resection versus pneumonectomy. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann2009; 17: 175–182.
37.
KlempererJGinsbergRJ. Morbidity and mortality after pneumonectomy. Chest Surg Clin N Am1999; 9: 515–525.
38.
DengYWangJMuJ, et al.Complete uniportal thoracoscopic anatomic lung resection with systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: personal experience of 326 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech2020; 30: 173–179.
39.
TroncFGrégoireJRouleauJ, et al.Long-term results of sleeve lobectomy for lung cancer. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg2000; 17: 550–556.
40.
MaZDongAFanJ, et al.Does sleeve lobectomy concomitant with or without pulmonary artery reconstruction (double sleeve) have favorable results for non-small cell lung cancer compared with pneumonectomy? A meta-analysis. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg2007; 32: 20–28.
41.
LausbergHFGraeterTPWendlerO, et al.Bronchial and bronchovascular sleeve resection for treatment of central lung tumors. Ann Thorac Surg2000; 70: 367–371.
42.
BalduyckBHendriksJLauwersP, et al.Quality of life after lung cancer surgery: a prospective pilot study comparing bronchial sleeve lobectomy with pneumonectomy. J Thorac Oncol2008; 3: 604–608.
43.
LausbergHFGraeterTPTschollD, et al.Bronchovascular versus bronchial sleeve resection for central lung tumors. Ann Thorac Surg2005; 79: 1147–1152.
44.
LudwigCStoelbenEOlschewskiM, et al.Comparison of morbidity, 30-day mortality, and long-term survival after pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg2005; 79: 968–973.
45.
AlexiouCBeggsDOnyeakaP, et al.Pneumonectomy for stage I (T1N0 and T2N0) nonsmall cell lung cancer has potent, adverse impact on survival. Ann Thorac Surg2003; 76: 1023–1028.
46.
DeslauriersJGrégoireJJacquesLF, et al.Sleeve lobectomy versus pneumonectomy for lung cancer: a comparative analysis of survival and sites or recurrences. Ann Thorac Surg2004; 77: 1152–1156.
47.
FergusonMKKarrisonT. Does pneumonectomy for lung cancer adversely influence long-term survival?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2000; 119: 440–448.
48.
StoelbenESauerbreiWLudwigC, et al.Tumor stage and early mortality for surgical resections in lung cancer. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg2003; 388: 116–121.
49.
MunavvarMKhanMAIEdwardsJ, et al.The autoclavable semirigid thoracoscope: the way forward in pleural disease?Eur Respir J2007; 29: 571–574.
50.
ReilinkRde BruinGFrankenM, et al.Endoscopic camera control by head movements for thoracic surgery. In: 2010 3rd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. IEEE; 2010: 510–5.
51.
BreedveldPSheltesJSBlomEM, et al.A new, easily miniaturized steerable endoscope. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag2005; 24: 40–47.
52.
GuanYHuangJXiaT, et al.Preoperative evaluation of stage T3, central-type non-small cell lung cancer with double sleeve lobectomy under complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using spiral computed tomography post-processing techniques. J Thorac Dis2016; 8: 1738.
53.
NakagawaTTomiokaYToyazakiT, et al.Clinical experience of thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy using a novel needle holder. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2018; 30: 381–383.
54.
WangWXuZXiongX, et al.Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Thorac Dis2013; 5: S253.
55.
BeauchampG. Fundamentals of standard sleeve resection. Thorac Surg Clin2018; 28: 285–289.
56.
AgostiniPJLuggSTAdamsK, et al.Risk factors and short-term outcomes of postoperative pulmonary complications after VATS lobectomy. J Cardiothorac Surg2018; 13: 1–8.
57.
LuggSTAgostiniPJTikkaT, et al.Long-term impact of developing a postoperative pulmonary complication after lung surgery. Thorax2016; 71: 171–176.
58.
AgostiniPLuggSTAdamsK, et al.Postoperative pulmonary complications and rehabilitation requirements following lobectomy: a propensity score matched study of patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2017; 24: 931–937.
59.
LyscovAObukhovaTRyabovaV, et al.Double-sleeve and carinal resections using the uniportal VATS technique: a single centre experience. J Thorac Dis2016; 8: S235.
60.
MaSYanTLiuD, et al.Initial experience of sleeve lobectomy under complete video-assisted thoracic surgery. Asia-Pacific J Clin Oncol2018; 14: 114–119.
61.
GaoSJCorsoCDWangEH, et al.Timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced non–small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol2017; 12: 314–322.
62.
AlbainKSSwannRSRuschVW, et al.Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet2009; 374: 379–386.
63.
TheiseNDHenegariuOGroveJ, et al.Radiation pneumonitis in mice: a severe injury model for pneumocyte engraftment from bone marrow. Exp Hematol2002; 30: 1333–1338.
64.
LingosTIRechtAViciniF, et al.Radiation pneumonitis in breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1991; 21: 355–360.
65.
D’AndrilliAVenutaFMauriziG, et al.Bronchial and arterial sleeve resection after induction therapy for lung cancer. Thorac Surg Clin2014; 24: 411–421.
66.
AugustinFMaierHLucciariniP, et al.Extended minimally invasive lung resections: VATS bilobectomy, bronchoplasty, and pneumonectomy. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg2016; 401: 341–348.
HuZHeZLiZ, et al.Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic bronchial sleeve lobectomy in five patients. Clin Surg Res Commun2018; 2: 9–14.
69.
WatanabeAKoyanagiTNakashimaS, et al.How to clamp the main pulmonary artery during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg2007; 31: 129–131.
70.
ChenHHuangLXuG, et al.Modified bronchial anastomosis in video-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy: a report of 32 cases. J Thorac Dis2016; 8: 2233.
71.
ZhangZHuangQLiaoY, et al.Application of the “continuous suture dividing and equal suture tightening” method in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery sleeve lobectomy. J Thorac Dis2018; 10: 5199.
72.
KamiyoshiharaMNagashimaTIgaiH, et al.Video-assisted thoracic lobectomy with bronchoplasty for lung cancer, with special reference to methodology. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2011; 12: 534–539.
73.
ShaoFLiuZPanY, et al.Bronchoplasty using continuous suture in complete monitor view: a suitable method of thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. World J Surg Oncol2016; 14: 134.
74.
LiuLMeiJPuQ, et al.Thoracoscopic bronchovascular double sleeve lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg2014; 46: 493–495.
75.
NakanishiK. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy with bronchoplasty for lung cancer: initial experience and techniques. Ann Thorac Surg2007; 84: 191–195.
76.
YuDHanYZhouS, et al.Video-assisted thoracic bronchial sleeve lobectomy with bronchoplasty for treatment of lung cancer confined to a single lung lobe: a case series of Chinese patients. J Cardiothorac Surg2014; 9: 67.
77.
HuangJLiSHaoZ, et al.Complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) bronchial sleeve lobectomy. J Thorac Dis2016; 8: 553–574.
MahtabifardAFullerCBMcKenna JrRJ. Video-assisted thoracic surgery sleeve lobectomy: a case series. Ann Thorac Surg2008; 85: 729–732.
80.
KoryllosAStoelbenE. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) sleeve resections for non-small cell lung cancer patients: an observational prospective study and technique analysis. J Vis Surg2018; 4: 16.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
