Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

The aim was to evaluate early and long-term outcomes of re-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement (AVR) with previous patent coronary artery grafts.

Methods

Data for re-sternotomy for AVRs (group 1 isolated AVR, group 2 AVR with concomitant procedure) were collected (2000–2019). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality and postoperative composite outcome (in-hospital death, transient ischemic attack/stroke, renal failure requiring new hemofiltration, deep sternal wound infection, re-exploration for bleeding/tamponade and length of stay >30 days). Survival curves were compared using log-rank test Cox proportion hazards model was used for predictors of long-term survival.

Results

Total 178 patients were included (groups 1–90 patients, group 2–88 patients). Mean age was 75 ± 4 years and mean log EuroSCORE was 17 ± 12% (15 ± 8% – group 1 vs. 19 ± 14% – group 2, p = 0.06). Mean follow-up was 6.3 ± 4.4 years. Cardiovascular injury occurred in 12%. Left internal mammary artery was most commonly injured. In-hospital mortality was 7.8% (5% – group 1 vs. 10.2% – group 2, p = 0.247). NYHA class III–IV, perioperative intra-aortic balloon pump and cardiovascular injury were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio: 13.33, 95% confidence interval: 2.04–83.33, p = 0.007). Survival was significantly worse with cardiovascular injury at re-sternotomy up to 5 years (46% vs. 67%, p = 0.025) and postoperative complications (p = 0.023). Survival was significantly lower than age-matched first-time AVR and UK population.

Conclusions

Long-term survival is significantly impaired by cardiovascular injury and perioperative complications of re-sternotomy.

Keywords

Re-sternotomy aortic valve replacement patent coronary grafts cardiovascular injury transcatheter aortic valve

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Morales

Williams

John

. Is resternotomy in cardiac surgery still a problem? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 11: 277–286.

Carrel

. Can redo sternotomy become as easy as first-time sternal opening? Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 111: 189–190.

Höllriegel

Spindler

Kiefer

, et al. Outcome of patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting and severe calcific aortic stenosis receiving transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 96: E196–E203.

Reinöhl

Kaier

Reinecke

, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the new standard in patients with previous coronary bypass grafting? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 9: 2137–2143.

Imran Hamid

Digney

Soo

, et al. Incidence and outcome of re-entry injury in redo cardiac surgery: benefits of preoperative planning. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 47: 819–823.

Rupprecht

Schopka

Keyser

, et al. 25 years’ experience with redo operations in cardiac surgery-third-time sternotomy procedures. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1719157. Epub ahead of print.

Preventza

Amarasekara

Price

, et al. Propensity score analysis in patients with and without previous isolated coronary artery bypass grafting who require proximal aortic and arch surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; S0022–5223: 33144–5. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.153. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33419538.

Iturra

Greason

Suri

, et al.

Repeat sternotomy for surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarian patients with aortic valve stenosis and previous coronary artery bypass graft operation: what is the operative risk?

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148: 1899–1902.

D’Agostino

Jacobs

Badhwar

, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons adult cardiac surgery database: 2019 update on outcomes and quality. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 107: 24–32.

10.

Malvindi

Luthra

Olevano

, et al. Aortic valve replacement with biological prosthesis in patients aged 50–69 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 59: 1077–1086.

11.

Malvindi

Luthra

Giritharan

, et al. Long-term survival after surgical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 80 years and over. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 60: 671–678.

12.

Vohra

Pousios

Whistance

, et al. Aortic valve replacement in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting: 10-year experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 41: e1–e6.

13.

Park

Suri

Burkhart

3rd , et al.

What is the optimal myocardial preservation strategy at re-operation for aortic valve replacement in the presence of a patent internal thoracic artery?

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 39: 861–865.

14.

Park

Suri

Burkhart

3rd , et al. Identifying patients at particular risk of injury during repeat sternotomy: analysis of 2555 cardiac reoperations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140: 1028–1035.

15.

Byrne

Karavas

Filsoufi

, et al. Aortic valve surgery after previous coronary artery bypass grafting with functioning internal mammary artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 779–784.

16.

Kaneko

Nauta

Borstlap

, et al. The “no-dissection” technique is safe for reoperative aortic valve replacement with a patent left internal thoracic artery graft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144: 1036–1040.

17.

Yildiz

Ulukan

Erkanli

, et al. Preoperative arterial and venous cannulation in redo cardiac surgery: from the safety and cost-effectiveness points of view. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 35: 927–933.

18.

Ando

Briasoulis

Holmes

, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with previous coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2016; 215: 14–19.

19.

Stortecky

Brinks

Wenaweser

, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement as redo procedure after prior coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92: 1324–1330; discussion 1230–1.

20.

Luthra

Ohri

. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for low-risk aortic stenosis: are we ready? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 57: 413–417.

21.

Luthra

Leiva-Juárez

Ohri

. Surgical vs transfemoral aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: an updated meta-analysis of trial and registry data. J Card Surg 2020; 35: 2264–2274.

22.

Luthra

Ohri

. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is still inappropriate in low-risk, young patients: a UK perspective. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2021; 82: 1–4.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

Early and long-term outcomes of re-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement with patent coronary artery grafts

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material