The correlation between intracranial and aortic aneurysms remains elusive. Data in the literature are scattered, and outcome reporting is swamped with heterogeneity and single-center bias. This calamity is adding to confusion on decision-making and delays the instigation of appropriate clinical applications. This literature review delves into the abyss of the lack of clinically driven scientific input, and highlights the trends explored thus far.
FlemmingKDWiebersDOBrownRD, et al.
The natural history of radiographically defined vertebrobasilar nonsaccular intracranial aneurysms.Cerebrovasc Dis2005;
20:270–9.
2.
NakatomiHSegawaHKurataA, et al.
Clinicopathological study of intracranial fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms. Stroke2000;
31:896–900.
3.
GoyalMSGottumukkalaRBhallaS, et al.
Bicuspid aortic valves and thoracic aortic aneurysms in patients with intracranial aneurysms.Neurology2015;
84:46–9.
4.
BrinjikjiWNasrDMFlemmingKD, et al.
Clinical and imaging characteristics of diffuse intracranial dolichoectasia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2017;
38:915–22.
5.
KurteliusAVänttiNRezai JahromiB, et al.
Association of intracranial aneurysms with aortic aneurysms in 125 patients with fusiform and 4253 patients with saccular intracranial aneurysms and their family members and population controls. J Am Heart Assoc2019;
8:e013277.
6.
LaukkaDPanEFordellT, et al.
Prevalence of thoracic aneurysms or dilatations in patients with the intracranial aneurysms.J Vasc Surg2019;
70:1801–8.
7.
ErbenYBarrettKMFreemanWD.Prevalence of previously undiagnosed abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with intracranial aneurysms: from the Brain and Aortic Aneurysms Study (BAAS). J Vasc Surg2020;
71:712.
8.
KuzmikGAFeldmanMTranquilliM, et al.
Concurrent intracranial and thoracic aortic aneurysms.Am J Cardiol2010;
105:417–20.
9.
LeeDAhnSJChoES, et al.
High prevalence of intracranial aneurysms in patients with aortic dissection or aneurysm: feasibility of extended aorta CT angiography with involvement of intracranial arteries. J Neurointerventional Surg2017;
9:1017–21.
10.
ShinYWJungKHMoonJ, et al.
Site-specific relationship between intracranial aneurysm and aortic aneurysm.Stroke2015;
46:1993–6.
11.
RouchaudABrandtMDRydbergAM, et al.
Prevalence of intracranial aneurysms in patients with aortic aneurysms.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2016;
37:1664–8.
12.
MalhotraAWuXMatoukCC, et al.
MR Angiography screening and surveillance for intracranial aneurysms in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Radiology2019;
291:400–8.
13.
WangJCChienWCChungCH, et al.
Association between surgical repair of aortic aneurysms and the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. J Vasc Surg2020;
71:481–9.
14.
RiambauVBöcklerDBrunkwallJ, et al.
Editor’s Choice – management of descending thoracic aorta diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS).Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2017;
53:4–52.
15.
HelgadottirAThorleifssonGMagnussonKP, et al.
The same sequence variant on 9p21 associates with myocardial infarction, abdominal aortic aneurysm and intracranial aneurysm.Nat Genet2008;
40:217–24.
16.
BallBZJiangBMehndirattaP, et al.
Screening individuals with intracranial aneurysms for abdominal aortic aneurysms is cost-effective based on estimated coprevalence.J Vasc Surg2016;
64:811–8.e3.
17.
ZhouZXuYDelcourtC, et al.
Is regular screening for intracranial aneurysm necessary in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cerebrovasc Dis2017;
44:75–82.
RegaladoEMedrekSTran-FaduluV, et al.
Autosomal dominant inheritance of a predisposition to thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections and intracranial saccular aneurysms. Am J Med Genet A2011;
155A:2125–30.
20.
GoASMozaffarianDRogerVL, et al.
Heart disease and stroke statistics—2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation2014;
129:e28–292.
DarlingRCMessinaCRBrewsterDC, et al.
Autopsy study of unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysms. The case for early resection. Circulation1977;
56(Suppl II):II161–4.
23.
FlemingCWhitlockEPBeilTL, et al.
Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a best-evidence systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med2005;
142:203–11.
24.
GretarsdottirSBaasAFThorleifssonG, et al.
Genome-wide association study identifies a sequence variant within the DAB2IP gene conferring susceptibility to abdominal aortic aneurysm.Nat Genet2010;
42:692–7.
25.
MalhotraASeifertKWuX, et al.
Screening for intracranial aneurysms in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms.Cerebrovasc Dis2019;
47:253–9.
26.
SakalihasanNMichelJBKatsargyrisA, et al.
Abdominal aortic aneurysms.Nat Rev Dis Primers2018;
4:34.
27.
OllikainenETulamoRFrösenJ, et al.
Mast cells, neovascularization, and microhemorrhages are associated with saccular intracranial artery aneurysm wall remodeling.J Neuropathol Exp Neurol2014;
73:855–64.
28.
PicoFLabreucheJAmarencoP.Pathophysiology, presentation, prognosis, and management of intracranial arterial dolichoectasia. Lancet Neurol2015;
14:833–45.
29.
CoadyMARizzoJAHammondGL, et al.
What is the appropriate size criterion for resection of thoracic aortic aneurysms?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1997;
113:476–91.
30.
HarkyAKai ChanJSMing WongCH, et al.
Open versus endovascular repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysm disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Vasc Surg2019;
54:304–15.e5.
31.
LemaîtreVDaboAJD’ArmientoJ.Cigarette smoke components induce matrix metalloproteinase-1 in aortic endothelial cells through inhibition of mTOR signaling.Toxicol Sci2011;
123:542–9.
32.
van KarnebeekCDNaeffMSMulderBJ, et al.
Natural history of cardiovascular manifestations in Marfan syndrome.Arch Dis Child2001;
84:129–37.
33.
PepinMSchwarzeUSuperti-FurgaA, et al.
Clinical and genetic features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, the vascular type.N Engl J Med2000;
342:673–80.
34.
AlbornozGCoadyMARobertsM, et al.
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections—incidence, modes of inheritance, and phenotypic patterns. Ann Thorac Surg2006;
82:1400–5.
35.
KentKCZwolakRMEgorovaNN, et al.
Analysis of risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a cohort of more than 3 million individuals. J Vasc Surg2010;
52:539–48.
36.
WahlgrenCMLarssonEMagnussonPK, et al.
Genetic and environmental contributions to abdominal aortic aneurysm development in a twin population.J Vasc Surg2010;
51:3–7.
37.
KuivaniemiHRyerEJElmoreJR, et al.
Understanding the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms.Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther2015;
13:975–87.
38.
RuigrokYMEliasRWijmengaC, et al.
A comparison of genetic chromosomal loci for intracranial, thoracic aortic, and abdominal aortic aneurysms in search of common genetic risk factors.Cardiovasc Pathol2008;
17:40–7.
39.
van ‘t HofFNRuigrokYMLeeCH, et al.
Shared genetic risk factors of intracranial, abdominal, and thoracic aneurysms. J Am Heart Assoc2016 Jul 14;
5(7). pii: e002603.
40.
BilguvarKYasunoKNiemeläM, et al.
Susceptibility loci for intracranial aneurysm in European and Japanese populations.Nat Genet2008;
40:1472–7.
41.
YasunoKBilguvarKBijlengaP, et al.
Genome-wide association study of intracranial aneurysm identifies three new risk loci.Nat Genet2010;
42:420–5.
42.
LeMaireSAMcDonaldMLGuoDC, et al.
Genome-wide association study identifies a susceptibility locus for thoracic aortic aneurysms and aortic dissections spanning FBN1 at 15q21.1. Nat Genet2011;
43:996–1000.
43.
AlgraAMLindgrenAVergouwenMD, et al.
Procedural clinical complications, case-fatality risks, and risk factors in endovascular and neurosurgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JAMA Neurol2019;
76:282–93.
44.
OurielKClairDGKentKC, et al.
Positive Impact of Endovascular Options for Treating Aneurysms Early (PIVOTAL) investigators. Endovascular repair compared with surveillance for patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms.J Vasc Surg2010;
51:1081–7.
45.
CaoPDe RangoPVerziniF, et al.
Comparison of surveillance versus aortic endografting for small aneurysm repair (CAESAR): results from a randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2011;
41:13–25.
46.
RoosendaalLCKramerGMWiersemaAM, et al.
Outcome of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2020;
59:16–22.
47.
FlahaultATrystramDNatafF, et al.
Screening for intracranial aneurysms in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease is cost-effective.Kidney Int2018;
93:716–26.
48.
LiLMBultersDOKirollosRW.A mathematical model of utility for single screening of asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms at the age of 50 years.Acta Neurochir (Wien)2012;
154:1145–52.
49.
CagnazzoFCarlo GambaccianiCMorgantiR, et al.
Intracranial aneurysms in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: prevalence, risk of rupture, and management. A systematic review.Acta Neurochir (Wein)2017;
159:811–21.
50.
CaranciFBrigantiFCirilloL, et al.
Epidemiology and genetics of intracranial aneurysms.Eur J Radiol2013;
82:1598–605.
51.
StoutNKRosenbergMATrentham-DietzA, et al.
Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.J Natl Cancer Inst2006;
98:774–82.
52.
MiyazawaNAkiyamaIYamagataZ.Risk factors for the association of intracranial and aortic aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien)2007;
149:221–9.
53.
MoonJChoYDYooDH, et al.
Growth of asymptomatic intracranial fusiform aneurysms. Clin Neuroradiol2019;
29:717–23.
54.
Al-KawazMKamelHMurthySB, et al.
Association of aortic aneurysms and dissections with subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Am Heart Assoc2019;
8:e013456.
55.
ParkJHKimYILimYC.Clinical outcomes of treatment for intracranial aneurysm in elderly patients. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg2014;
16:193–9.
56.
NieuwkampDJSetzLEAlgraA, et al.
Changes in case fatality of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and region: a meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol2009;
8:635–42.
57.
PegoliMMandrekarJRabinsteinAA, et al.
Predictors of excellent functional outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.J Neurosurg2015;
122:414–8.
58.
MolyneuxAJKerrRSYuLM, et al.
International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet2005;
366:809–17.
