RayAAButhKJSullivanJAJohnstoneDEHirschGM. Waiting for cardiac surgery: results of a risk-stratified queuing process. Circulation2001; 104 (12 Suppl 1): I-92–8.
2.
RexiusHBrandrup-WognsenGOdenAJeppssonA. Mortality on the waiting list for coronary artery bypass grafting: incidence and risk factors. Ann Thorac Surg2004; 77: 769–75.
3.
BernsteinSJRigterHBrorssonBHilborneLHLeapeLLMeijlerAP. Waiting for coronary revascularization: a comparison between New York State, The Netherlands and Sweden. Health Policy1997; 42: 15–27.
4.
BengtsonAKarlssonTHjalmarsonAHerlitzJ. Complications prior to revascularization among patients waiting for coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Eur Heart J1996; 17: 1846–51.
5.
KochKTPiekJJDavidGKMulderKPetersRJLieKI. Does a waiting time for elective coronary angioplasty affect the primary success rate?Heart1997; 77: 432–6.
6.
AzizORaoCPanesarSSJonesCMorrisSDarziA. Meta-analysis of minimally invasive internal thoracic artery bypass versus percutaneous revascularisation for isolated lesions of the left anterior descending artery. BMJ2007; 334: 617.
7.
JafferyZKowalskiMWeaverWDKhanalS. A meta-analysis of randomized control trials comparing minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2007; 31: 691–7.
8.
BeggCChoMEastwoodSHortonRMoherDOlkinI. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA1996; 276: 637–9.
9.
MoherDSchulzKFAltmanDG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet2001; 14: 1191–4.
10.
KimJWLimDSSunKShimWJRhoYM. Stenting or MIDCAB using ministernotomy for revascularization of proximal left anterior descending artery?Int J Cardiol2005; 30;99:437–41.
11.
HongSJLimDSSeoHSKimYHShimWJParkCG. Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation vs. minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) in patients with left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv2005; 64: 75–81.
12.
ReevesBCAngeliniGDBryanAJTaylorFCCrippsTSpytTJ. A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting for proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Health Technol Assess2004; 8: 1–43.
13.
CisowskiMDrzewieckiJDrzewiecka-GerberAJaklikAKruczakWSzczeklikM. Primary stenting versus MIDCB: preliminary report-comparison of two methods of revascularization in single left anterior descending coronary stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg2002; 74: S1334–9.
14.
DiegelerAThieleHFalkVHambrechtRSpyrantisNSickP. Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med2002; 347: 561–6.
15.
DrenthDJVeegerNJWinterJBGrandjeanJGMarianiMAvan BovenAJ. A prospective randomized trial comparing stenting with off-pump coronary surgery for high-grade stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: three-year follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol2002; 40: 1955–60.
16.
HannanELRaczMJWalfordGJonesRHRyanTJBennettE. Long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med2005; 352: 2174–83.
