Who Reviews the Reviewers?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Moher

Schulz

Altman

. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:2–7.

Kassirer

Campion

. Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable. JAMA 1994;272:96–7.

Mangano

Tudor

Dietzel

. The risk associated with aprotinin in cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2006;354:353–65.

Sedrakyan

Treasure

Elefteriades

. Effect of aprotinin on clinical outcomes in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials [Review]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:442–8.

Henry

Moxey

Carless

O'Connell

McClelland

Henderson

. Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion [Review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;1:CD001886.

Mangano

. Aspirin and mortality from coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1309–17.

Mangano

Diamondstone

Ramsay

Aggarwal

Herskowitz

Mangano

. Renal dysfunction after myocardial revascularization: Risk factors, adverse outcomes, and hospital resource utilization. The Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:194–203.

Altman

. Poor-quality medical research: What can journals do? JAMA 2002;287:2765–7.