Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Three studies are reported addressing the reliability of the Scale for Assessing Emotional Disturbance (Epstein & Cullinan, 1998), a standardized, norm-referenced measure linked to the federal definition of emotional disturbance (ED). The first and second studies investigated test–retest reliability over a 2-week period to determine the stability of the measure over time. The third study investigated interrater reliability between six pairs of teachers who had worked with a student for 2 or more months to determine the consistency with which the measure can be used by different individuals. In each study, samples were drawn from populations of students identified as having ED. Test–retest reliability coefficients were above .80, the standard recommended for screening tests that will be reported individually. Interrater reliability coefficients were at least .79 for all subscales except Unhappiness or Depression and Physical Symptoms or Fears. Implications for use of the SAED are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achenbach

T. M.

(1991a). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.

Achenbach

T. M.

(1991b). Manual for the Teacher's Report Form and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.

Achenbach

T. M.

(1995). Developmental issues in assessment, taxonomy, and diagnosis of child and adolescent psychopathology. In Cicchetti

, & Cohen

D. J.

(Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Volume 1: Theory and methods (pp. 57–80). New York: Wiley.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Anastasi

(1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Breen

M. J.

, & Fiedler

C. R.

(Eds.). (1996). Behavioral approach to assessment of youth with emotional/behavioral disorders. Austin: PRO-ED.

Brown

, & Hammill

D. R.

(1990). Behavior Rating Profile. Austin: PRO-ED.

Bureau of the Census. (1990). Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: Author.

Cronbach

L. J.

(1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

10.

Cullinan

, & Epstein

M. H.

(1990). Behavior disorders. In Haring

N.G.

, & McCormick

(Eds.), Exceptional children and youth (5th ed., pp. 153–192). Columbus, OH: Macmillan.

11.

Epstein

M. H.

, & Cullinan

(1998). Scale for Assessing Emotional Disturbance. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

12.

Federal Register. (1981). 46, 3, 886.

13.

Federal Register. (1997). 62, 204, 55031.

14.

Kauffman

J. M.

(1993). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

15.

McConaughy

S. H.

(1993). Evaluating behavioral and emotional disorders with the CBCL, TRF, and YSR cross-informant scales. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 1, 40–52.

16.

Merrell

K. W.

(1994). Assessment of behavioral, social, and emotional problems. White Plains, NY: Longman.

17.

Quay

H. C.

, & Peterson

(1996). Revised Behavior Problem Checklist, PAR Edition: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

18.

Reynolds

C. R.

, & Kamphaus

R. W.

(1992). Behavior Assessment System for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

19.

Salvia

, & Ysseldyke

(1998). Assessment in special and remedial education (7th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

20.

Witt

J. C.

, Elliott

S. N.

, Kramer

J. J.

, & Gresham

F. M.

(1994). Assessment of children: Fundamental methods and practices. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.

The Scale for Assessing Emotional Disturbance: Test–Retest and Interrater Reliability

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References