Primary among the issues in the study of school-age children with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) is the prediction and control of aggressive behavior. Definitional and conceptual problems in measurement have limited our ability to identify and describe classroom conditions that predict occurrences of aggression. In this paper, we revisit briefly a number of issues in the direct measurement of classroom aggression including low base rates, interactional sequences, and reliability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlessiG. (1988). Direct observation methods for emotional/behavior problems. In ShapiroE. S., & KratochwillT. R. (Eds.), Behavioral assessment in schools: Conceptual foundations and practical applications (pp. 14–75). New York: The Guilford Press.
2.
BaerD. M. (1986a). In application, frequency is not the only estimate of the probability of behavior units. In ThompsonT., & ZeilerM. D. (Eds.), Analysis and Integration of Behavioral Units (pp. 117–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
BaerD. M. (1986b). For want of a nail…A review of “Evaluating Behavior Therapy Outcomes.”The Behavior Analyst, 9, 197–198.
4.
BakemanR., & GottmanJ. M. (1986). Observing interaction. An introduction to sequential analysis.New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BijouS. W., PetersonR. F., & AultM. H. (1968). A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concept.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 175–191.
6.
BussA. H. (1961). The psychology of aggression.New York: John Wiley.
7.
CarrE. G., & DurandV. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.
8.
DodgeK. A. (1991). The structure and function of reactive and proactive aggression. In PeplerD. J., & RubinK. H. (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 201–218). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
DurandV. M., & CrimminsD. B. (1988). Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 99–117.
10.
GunterP. L., JackS. L., ShoresR. E., CarrellD. E., & FlowersJ. (1993). Lag sequential analysis as a tool for functional analysis of student disruptive behavior in classrooms.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 1, 138–148.
11.
GunterP. L., ShoresR. E., JackS. L., DennyR. K., & DePaepeP. (1994). A case study of the effects of altering instructional interactions on the disruptive behavior of a child identified with severe behavior disorders.Education and Treatment of Children, 17, 435–444.
12.
HartupW. W. (1979). Levels of analysis in the study of social interaction: An historical perspective. In LambM. E., SuomiS. J., and StephensonG. R. (Eds.), Social Interacation Analysis (pp. 11–32). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
13.
LubinskiD., & ThompsonT. (1986). Functional units of human behavior and their integration: A dispositional analysis. In ThompsonT., & ZeilerM. D. (Eds.), Analysis and Integration of Behavioral Units (pp. 275–314). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
MaceF. C. (1994). Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technologies.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 529–550.
15.
O'NeillR., HornerR., AlbinR., StoreyK., & SpragueJ. (1990). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A practical assessment guide.Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
16.
PeplerD. J., & RubinK. H. (Eds.) (1991). The development and treatment of childhood aggression.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
ReppA. C., FelceD., & BartonL. E. (1988). Basing the treatment of stereotypic and self-injurious behaviors on hypotheses of their causes.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 281–289.
18.
ShoresR. E. (1988). Highlighting analysis in applied behavior analysis: Designing and analyzing single subject research. In RutherfordR. B.Jr., & MaagJ. W. (Eds), Monograph in Behavioral Disorders, 11, 144–155.
19.
Shores.R. E., JackS. L., GunterP. L.EllisD., De-BriereT. J., & WehbyJ. H. (1993). Classroom interactions of children with behavior disorders.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 1, 27–39.
20.
ShoresR. E., WehbyJ. H., & JackS. L. (in press). Analyzing behavior disorders in classrooms. In ReppA., & HornerR. (Eds.), Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support.Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
21.
TawneyJ. W., & GastD. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education.Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
22.
VyesS. A., & MulickJ. A. (1990). Ecobehavioral assessment: Future directions in the planning and evaluation of behavioral interventions. In SchroederS. (Ed.), Ecobehavioral analysis and developmental disabilities: The twenty-first century (pp. 228–244). New York: Springer-Verlag.
23.
WehbyJ. H. (1990). Analysis of the antecedents and consequents to aggressive behavior in classrooms for students identified as seriously emotionally disturbed. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
24.
WehbyJ. H., SymonsF., & ShoresR. E. (1995). A descriptive analysis of aggressive behavior in classrooms for children with emotional and behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 20, 87–105.
