This article discusses three major issues currently having significant impact on the education of students with autism. Included in the discussion are the field's considerable reliance on implausible, unsupported, and other controversial treatments; the issue of full time inclusion of students with autism in general education classrooms; and preparation of personnel to serve the needs of students with autism. Discussion of each of these issues is followed by recommendations for action.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BiklenD. (1990). Communication unbound: Autism and praxis.Harvard Educational Review, 60, 291–314.
2.
BiklenD. (1992). Typing to talk: Facilitated communication.American Journal of Speech and Language Pathology, 1(2), 15–17.
3.
BiklenD. (1993). Communication unbound: How facilitated communication is challenging traditional views of autism and ability/disability.New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
BlalockG. (1991). Paraprofessionals: Critical team members in our special education programs.Intervention in School and Clinic, 26, 200–214.
5.
BullockL., & SimpsonR. (Eds.). (1990). Critical issues in special education: Implications for personnel preparation.Denton: University of North Texas.
6.
CalculatorS. N. (1992). Perhaps the emperor has clothes after all: A response to Biklen.American Journal of Speech and Language Pathology, 1(2), 18–20.
7.
CardinalD., GriffinJ., & ChristensonG. (1993). Do tinted lenses really help students with reading disabilities?Intervention in School and Clinic, 28, 275–279.
8.
Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy, Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century.New York: Author.
9.
CrossleyR. (1992). Who said that? In DEAL Communication Centre (Eds.), Facilitated communication training (pp. 42–54). Melbourne, Australia: DEAL Communication Centre.
10.
CumminsR., & PriorM. (1992). Autism and assisted communication: A response to Biklen.Harvard Educational Review, 62, 228–241.
11.
DykeR. V., StallingsM. A., & ColleyK. (1995). How to build an inclusive school community: A success story.Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 475–479.
12.
FiedlerC., & SimpsonR. L. (1987). Modifying the attitudes of nonhandicapped high school students toward handicapped peers.Exceptional Children, 53, 342–351.
13.
FreemanB. J. (1993). Questions to ask regarding specific treatment.The Advocate, 25(2), 19.
14.
Friel-PattiS. (1994). Commitment to theory.American journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3(4), 30–34.
15.
FuchsD., & FuchsL. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform.Exceptional Children, 60, 294–309.
16.
FuchsD., & FuchsL. S. (1995). What's “special” about special education?Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 522–530.
17.
GartnerA., & LipskyD. K. (1989). The yoke of special education: How to break it.Rochester, NY: National Center on Education and the Economy.
18.
GoodladJ. I. (1990). Teachers for our nation's schools.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
HarrisJ. A. (1974). Drastic proposals for educational improvement.Today's Education, 63(4), 5.
20.
Holmes Group. (1990). Tomorrow's schools: Principles for the design of professional development schools.East Lansing: Michigan State University Holmes Group.
21.
HoweK. R., & MiramontesO. B. (1992). The ethics of special education.New York: Teachers College Press.
22.
JoyceB., & ShowersB. (1982). The coaching of teaching.Educational Leadership, 40(1), 4–10.
23.
KauffmanJ. M., & HallahanD. P. (1994). Preface. In KauffmanJ. M., & HallahanD. P. (Eds.), The illusion of full inclusion (pp. ix–xi). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
24.
KauffmanJ. M., LloydJ. W., BakerJ., & RiedelT. M. (1995). Inclusion of all students with emotional or behavioral disorders? Let's think again.Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 542–546.
25.
KnoffH. M. (1984). Mainstreaming attitudes and special placement knowledge in labeling versus nonlabeling states.Remedial and Special Education, 5(6), 7–14.
26.
LovaasO. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3–9.
27.
LovatT. J. (1994). The implications of bioethics for teachers and teacher researchers.British Educational Research Journal, 20, 187–196.
28.
MaddenN. A., & SlavinR. E. (1983). Mainstreaming students with mild handicaps: Academic and social outcomes.Review of Educational Research, 53, 519–569.
29.
MartinE. (1974). Some thoughts on mainstreaming.Exceptional Children, 41, 150–153.
30.
MylesB. S., & SimpsonR. L. (1989). Regular educators’ modification preferences for mainstreaming mildly handicapped children.Journal of Special Education, 22, 479–492.
31.
MylesB. S., & SimpsonR. L. (1992). General educators’ mainstreaming preferences that facilitate acceptance of students with behavioral disorders and learning disabilities.Behavioral Disorders, 17, 305–315.
32.
National Association of State Boards of Education. (1992). Winners all: A call for inclusive schools.Alexandria, VA: Author.
33.
PetersM. T., & HerronT. E. (1993). When the best is not good enough: An examination of best practice.The Journal of Special Education, 26, 371–385.
34.
RaisonJ., HansonL. A., HallC., & ReynoldsM. C. (1995). Another school's reality.Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 480–482.
35.
ReynoldsM. C., WangM. C., & WalbergH. J. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular education.Exceptional Children, 53, 391–398.
36.
RogersH., & SaklofskeD. H. (1985). Self-concepts, locus of control and performance expectations of learning disabled children.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 273–278.
37.
SailorW. (1991). Special education in the restructured school.Remedial and Special Education, 12(6), 8–22.
38.
SailorW., AndersonJ., HalvorsenA. T., DoeringK., FillerJ., & GoetzL. (1989). The comprehensive local school: Regular education for all students with disabilities.Baltimore: Brookes.
39.
SassoG. M., SimpsonR. L., & NovakC. G. (1985). Procedures for facilitating integration of autistic children in public school settings.Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 233–246.
40.
SchoplerE. (1992). Facilitated communication—hope or hype?Autism Society of North Carolina, 8(3), 6.
41.
ShapiroJ.P., LoebP., BowermasterD., & TochT. (1993, December 13). Separate and unequal: How special education programs are cheating our children and costing taxpayers billions each year.U.S. News and World Report, 115(23), 46–60.
42.
SimpsonR. L., & MylesB. S. (1990). The general education collaboration model: A model for successful mainstreaming.Focus on Exceptional Children, 23(4), 1–10.
43.
SimpsonR. L., & MylesB. S. (1991). Ancillary staff members’ mainstreaming recommendations for students with exceptionalities.Psychology in the Schools, 28(1), 26–32.
44.
SimpsonR. L., & MylesB. S. (1995). Effectiveness of facilitated communication with children and youth with autism.Journal of Special Education, 28, 424–439.
45.
SimpsonR. L., & SassoG. M. (1992). Full inclusion of students with autism in general education settings: Values versus science.Focus on Autistic Behavior, 7(3), 1–13.
46.
SimpsonR. L., & WhelanR. J., & ZabelR. H. (1993). Special education personnel preparation in the 21st century: Issues and strategies.Remedial and Special Education, 14(2), 7–22.
47.
SkrticT. (1991). Behind special education: A critical analysis of professional culture and school organization.Denver: Love.
48.
SmelterR., RaschB., & YudewitzG. (1994). Thinking of inclusion for all special needs students? Better think again.Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 231–239
49.
SmithF. (1995). Let's declare education a disaster and get on with our lives.Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 584–590.
50.
Smith-DavisJ., BurkeP. J., & NoelM. M. (1984). Personnel to educate the handicapped in America: Supply and demand from a programmatic viewpoint.College Park: University of Maryland, Institute for the Study of Children and Youth, Department of Special Education.
51.
StainbackS., & StainbackW. (1992). Schools as inclusive communities. In StainbackW., & StainbackS. (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education (pp. 29–43). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
52.
StainbackW., & StainbackS. (1984). A rationale for the merger of regular and special education.Exceptional Children, 51(2), 102–111.
53.
TrachtmanP. (1994, September). NIH looks at the implausible and the inexplicable.Smithsonian, 110–123.
54.
U.S. Department of Education. (1994). Sixtheenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the individuals with Disabilities Education Act.Washington, DC: Author.
55.
WangM. C., ReynoldsM. C., & WalbergH. J. (1986). Rethinking special education.Educational Leadership, 44, 26–31.
56.
WillM. (1984). Let us pause and reflect—But not for long.Exceptional Children, 5111–16.
