The purpose of this study was to assess the opinions, via a nationwide survey, of 109 teachers of students with behavioral disorders about substance-use prevention. The major finding from the study is that little is being done to provide students with behavioral disorders programming in this area. Teachers were not in agreement in their assignment of priority to the area of substance-use prevention instruction in relation to the other subjects they teach (about a third assigned it highest priority; about a third assigned it lowest priority). Additionally, teachers reported that parents of students with behavioral disorders were virtually absent from prevention program efforts. Lack of time, of curriculum materials, and of adequate funding were noted as the greatest impediments to prevention programming. To enhance substance-use prevention efforts, careful attention to a variety of issues that affect its implementation must be systematically conducted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CarverR. P. (1978). The case against statistical signficance testing.Harvard Educational Review,48(3), 378–399.
2.
DryfoosJ.C. (1990). Adolescents at risk: Prevalence and prevention.New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
ElmquistD.L. (1991). School-based alcohol and other drug prevention programs: Guidelines for the special educator.Intervention in School and Clinic,27, 10–19.
4.
ElmquistD.L. (1992). Development and evaluation of a substance use prevention parent-involvement program for parents of students with mild disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, Department of Special Education.
5.
ElmquistD.L., MorganD.P., & BoldsP. (1992). Substance use among adolescents with disabilities.International Journal of the Addictions,27, 1475–1483.
6.
FalcoM. (1992). The making of a drug-free America: Programs that work.New York: Times Books.
7.
HansenW.B. (1990). School-based substance use prevention: A review of the state of the art in curriculum, 1980–1990.Winston-Salem, NC: Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University.
8.
HansenW.B., & GrahamJ.W. (1991). Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: Peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms.Preventive Medicine,20, 414–430.
9.
JakerG.F. (1989). Lessons learned: A review of research in drug education.Anoka, MN: Minnesota Prevention Resource Center.
10.
JohnstonL.D., O'MalleyP.M., & BachmanJ.G. (1993). Drug use among American seniors, college students, and young adults.Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse.
11.
LeoneP.E., GreenburgJ.M., TrickettE.J., & SperoE. (1989). A study of the use of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana by students identified as “seriously emotionally disturbed.”, Counterpoint,9 (3), 6–7.
12.
McManusM.E., & KauffmanJ.M. (1991). Working conditions of teachers of students with behavioral disorders: A national survey.Behavioral Disorders,16(4), 247–259.
13.
MayD., KundertD., & AkpanC. (1995). Are we preparing special educators for the issues facing schools in the 1990's?Teacher Education and Special Education,17(3), 192–199.
14.
MorganD.P. (1994). Preventing substance use among students with disabilities. In AgranM., Marchand-MartellaN., & MartellaR. (Eds.), Health and safety for persons with disabilities: Applications across community settings (pp. 135–159). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
15.
MorganD.P. (1993). Substance use prevention and students with behavioral disorders: Guidelines for school professionals.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders,1, 170–178.
16.
MorganD.P., CancioE., & LikinsM. (1992). Preventing substance use: What special educators need to know.Logan, UT: Department of Special Education, Utah State University.
17.
MorganD.P., FriedmanS., LikinsM., & GenauxM. (1994). The prevalence of substance use among students with disabilities.Logan, UT: Department of Special Education, Utah State University.
18.
PrendergastM., AustinG., & deMirandaJ. (1990). Substance use among youth with disabilities (Prevention Research Update No. 7). Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
19.
RoseE., GumT.K., & RoseL. (1988). A survey of drug and alcohol education in special education teacher preparation programs. Unpublished manuscript, Northern Illinois University, Dekalb.
20.
SchinkeS.P., BotvinG.J., & OrlandiM.A. (1991). Substance abuse in children and adolescents: Evaluation and intervention.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
21.
ShaverJ.P. (1993). What statistical significance testing is, and what it is not.Journal of Experimental Education,61(4), 293–316.
22.
SussmanS., DentC.W., BurtonD., StacyA.W., & FlayB.R. (1995). Developing school-based tobacco use prevention and cessation programs.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
23.
U.S. Department of Education. (1989). What works: Schools without drugs.Washington, DC: Author.
24.
U.S. Department of Education. (1990). Drug prevention curricula: A guide to selection and implementation.Washington, DC: Author.
25.
WittJ.C., MartensB.K., & ElliottS.N. (1984). Factors affecting teachers’ judgements of the acceptability of behavioral interventions: Time involvement, behavior problem severity, and type of intervention.Behavior Therapy,15, 204–209.
