This paper describes a probe intermix procedure designed to fade teacher-provided response prompts in situations in which learner responses should be self-paced. The probe intermix strategy requires the initial pairing of prompts and natural cues followed by a mix of prompted and probe (unprompted) trials within training sessions. The ratio of probe relative to prompted trials is then increased across sessions. An experimental demonstration of the procedure is presented and limitations are noted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BillingsleyF. F., & NeelR. S. (1985). Competing behaviors and their effects on skill generalization and maintenance.Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 357–372.
2.
BillingsleyF. F., & RomerL. T. (1983). Response prompting and transfer of stimulus control: Methods, research, and a conceptual framework.Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 8(2), 3–12.
3.
BillingsleyF. F., WhiteO. R., & MunsonR. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example.Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229–241.
4.
CarrE. G., & KologinskyE. (1983). Acquisition of expressive signing by autistic children II: Spontaneity and generalization effects.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 297–314.
5.
CharlopM. H., SchreibmanL., & ThibodeauM. G. (1985). Increasing spontaneous verbal responding in autistic children using a time delay procedure.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 155–166.
6.
FeldmanD., UlmanJ., & RosenbergM. (1985). Multielement fading technique for extending the generality of treatment effects across settings.Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 2, 274–281.
7.
FoxxR. M. (1982). Increasing behavior of severely retarded and autistic persons.Champaign, IL: Research Press.
8.
FoxxR. M., & AzrinN. H. (1973). Toilet training the retarded.Champaign, IL: Research Press.
9.
NeelR. S., BillingsleyF. F., & LambertC. (1983). IMPACT: A functional curriculum for educating autistic youth in natural environments. In RutherfordR. B.Jr. (Ed.), Severe behavior disorders of children and youth (Vol. 6, pp. 40–50). Reston, VA: Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders.
10.
PolsgroveL., & NelsonC. M. (1982). Curriculum intervention according to the behavioral model. In McDowellR. L., AdamsonG. W., & WoodF. H. (Eds.), Teaching emotionally disturbed children (pp. 169–205). Boston: Little, Brown.
11.
SalendS. J. (1984). Therapy outcome research: Threats to treatment integrity.Behavior Modification, 8, 221–222.
12.
SchlossP. J., HarrimanN. E., & PfefierK. (1985). Application of a sequential prompt reduction technique to the independent composition performance of behaviorally disordered youth.Behavioral Disorders, 11, 17–23.
13.
TouchetteP. E., & HowardJ. S. (1984). Errorless learning: Reinforcement contingencies and stimulus control transfer in delayed prompting.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 175–188.
