AntonakR. F. (1980). A hierarchy of attitudes toward exceptionality.Journal of Special Education,14, 231–241.
2.
BowerE. M. (1960). Early identification of emotionally handicapped children in school.Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
3.
GrosenickJ. K., & HuntzeS. L. (1980). National needs analysis in behavior disorders: Severe behavior disorders.Columbia: University of Missouri, Department of Special Education.
4.
GrosenickJ. K., HuntzeS. L., KochanB., PetersonR. L., RobertshawC. S., & WoodF. H. (1982). National needs analysis in behavior disorders: Psychotherapy as a related service.Columbia: University of Missouri, Department of Special Education.
5.
HarasymiwS. J., HorneM. D., & LewisS. C. (1976). Disability social distance hierarchy for population subgroups.Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine,8, 33–36.
6.
JohnsonJ. L. (1969). Special education and the inner city: A challenge for the future or another means for cooling the mark out?Journal of Special Education,8, 241–245.
7.
KauffmanJ. M. (1984). Saving children in the age of big brother: Moral and ethical issues in the identification of deviance.Behavioral Disorders,10, 60–70.
8.
KauffmanJ. M., McCulloughL. L., & SabornieE. J. (1984). Integrating exceptional students: Special problems involving the emotionally disturbed/behaviorally disordered.B.C. Journal of Special Education,8, 201–210.
9.
LongK. A. (1983). Emotionally disturbed children as an underdetected and underserved public school population: Reasons and recommendations.Behavioral Disorders,9, 45–54.
10.
RhodesW. C. (1967). The disturbed child: A problem of ecological management.Exceptional Children,33, 449–455.
11.
Rowley. (1982). Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley et al. 73 L. Ed 2d 690, 102 S. Ct. 3034.
12.
SalviaJ., SchultzE. W., & ChapinN. (1974). Reliability of the Bower Scale for screening of children with emotional handicaps.Exceptional Children,41, 117–118.
13.
SkibaR., & CaseyA. (1984). Interventions for behaviorally disordered students: A quantitative review and methodological critique. Manuscript submitted for publication.
14.
SmithC. R. (1981). Policy issues in providing psychotherapy and counseling. In WoodF. H. (Ed.), Perspectives for a new decade: Education's responsibility for seriously disturbed and behaviorally disordered children and youth (pp. 97–108). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
15.
Springdale v. Grace, 494 F. Supp. 266 (W. D. Ark. 1980), aff'd. 656 F. 2d 300 (8th Cir. 1981) J, vacated, 73 L. Ed. 2d 1380, 102 S. Ct. 3054, on remand, 693 F. 2d 41 (8th Cir. 1982).
16.
TringoJ. L. (1970). The hierarchy of preference toward disability groups.Journal of Special Education,4, 295–306.
17.
TurnbullH. R., & FiedlerC. R. (1984). Judicial interpretation of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act.Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
18.
WoodF. H. (1979). Defining disturbing, disordered, and disturbed behavior. In WoodF. H., & LakinK. C. (Eds.), Disturbing, disordered, or disturbed? (pp. 3–16). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
19.
WoodF. H. (1981). The influence of personal, social, and political factors on the labeling of students. In WoodF. H. (Ed.), Perspectives for a new decade: Education's responsibility for seriously disturbed and behaviorally disordered children and youth (pp. 45–62). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
20.
WoodF. H., & LakinK. C. (Eds.). (1979). Disturbing, disordered, or disturbed?Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
21.
WoodF. H., SmithC. R., & GrimesJ. (in press). Iowa assessment model in behavioral disorders. A training manual.Des Moines: Iowa Department of Public Instruction.
22.
WoodF. H., & ZabelR. H. (1978). Making sense of reports on the incidence of behavior disorders/emotional disturbance in school-age populations.Psychology in the Schools,15, 45–51.