Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Approaches to providing consultation through “experts” external to the school building, or through assigning consultation activities to special education with full-time direct teaching duties, are fraught with problems. An alternative approach is to establish a School Consultation Committee, composed of skilled regular and special education teachers, the building principal, and ancillary personnel. An outside consultant trains the committee to screen referrals, pinpoint and assess discrepancies between teacher expectations and child performance as well as to design, implement, monitor, and evaluate intervention plans. Preliminary results indicate that the School Consultation Committee is an effective approach for supporting behaviorally disordered pupils in the educational mainstream.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agne

R. M.

, and Ducharme

E. R.

, Inservice and continuing education: The need for a better mousetrap. Peabody Journal of Education, 1978, 55, pp. 90–98.

Anderson

, Fredericks

H. D.

, Baldwin

V. L.

, Dalke

, and McDonnell

J. J.

A data-based inservice teacher training model for public school systems.

Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1978, 13, pp. 224–228.

Cruickshank

D. R.

, Lorish

, and Thompson

What we think we know about inservice education.

Journal of Teacher Education, 1979, 30, pp. 27–31.

Evans

The consultant role of the resource teacher.

Exceptional Children, 1980, 46, pp. 402–404.

Hewett

F. M.

The emotionally disturbed child in the classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1968.

Houston

W. R.

, and Freiberg

H. J.

Perpetual motion, blindman's bluff, and inservice education.

Journal of Teacher Education, 1979, 30, pp. 7–9.

Nelson

C. M.

(Ed.) Field-based teacher training: Applications in special education. Minneapolis: Department of Psychoeducational Studies, University of Minnesota, 1978.

Nelson

C. M.

, and McGlothlin

J. E.

Mainstreaming behavior disordered children through teacher consultation: Two models. Presentation to the Third Annual Teachers of Children with Behavior Disorders Conference, Tempe, Arizona, 1979.

Reynolds

M. C.

, and Birch

J. W.

Teaching exceptional children in all America's schools. Reston, Virginia: Council for Exceptional Children, 1977.

10.

Robbins

R. C.

, Mercer

J. R.

, and Myers

C. E.

The school as a selecting-labeling system.

Journal of School Psychology, 1967, 5, pp. 270–279.

11.

Rude

C. R.

Trends and priorities in inservice training.

Exceptional Children, 1978, 45, pp. 172–176.

12.

Smith

C. R.

, White

, and Peterson

Iowa study, reintegration of emotionally disabled pupils: A preliminary report. Iowa Department of Public Instruction, 1979.

13.

Snell

M. E.

, Thompson

M. S.

, and Taylor

K. G.

Providing inservice to educators of the severely handicapped: The active response inservice training model.

Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1979, 14, pp. 25–33.

14.

Speece

, and Mandell

Resource room support services for regular classroom teachers.

Learning Disability Quarterly, 1980, 3, pp. 49–53.

15.

Tharp

R. G.

, and Wetzel

R. J.

Behavior modification in the natural environment. New York: Academic Press, 1969.

16.

Zirkel

P. A.

, and Albert

V. F.

Assessing teachers' preferences regarding inservice education.

The Clearing House, 1979, 52, pp. 328–333.

The School Consultation Committee: An Approach to Implementing a Teacher Consultation Model

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References