A closer look of the Youth Services System in Pennsylvania reveals specific change in delivery of services over the past year. Results of youth needs surveys are reported in this article. Specifications of a national model for youth development also is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrennanT., & HuizingaD.Theory Validation and Aggregate National Data: Integration Report of OYD Research FY 1975, 12, Behavioral Research and Evaluation Corporation, Boulder, Colorado, 1975.
2.
EdwardsA. L.Relationship between probability of endorsement and social desirability scale value for a set of 2,824 personality statements.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1966, 50, 238–239.
3.
HaskellM., & YablonskyL.Crime and Delinquency, 2nd edition, Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Co., 1974, p. 425.
4.
HelmstadterG.Principles of Psychological Measurement.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts,1964.
5.
LombardoD.The Pennsylvania Youth Services System: A Community Planning Model.Behavioral Disorders, 1977, 2(4), 235–237.
6.
ScottW. A.Attitude Measurement.The Handbook of Social Psychology, 2nd edition, LindzeyG., & AronsonE. (Eds.) Vol. II, London: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1968, p. 204–273.
7.
TruckenmillerJ.Construct Validation of the H.E.W.Office of Youth Development National Strategy for Youth Development,1978.
