BallardM., & SemmelM.Increasing teachers’ interaction with socially isolated children through application of CATTS.Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped (in preparation).
2.
BrownK., & SemmelM.Using CATTS to describe social interaction in a school for LD and ED children.Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped (in preparation).
3.
ColletL., & SemmelM.The analysis of sequential behavior in classrooms and social environments: Problems and proposed solutions.Classroom Interaction Newsletter10 (Fall), 1974, 33–44.
4.
DolleyD. G.Mothers as teachers: Instruction and control patterns observed in interactions of middle-class mothers with trainable mentally retarded and nonretarded children.Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped,1974.
5.
DunkinM. J., & BiddleB. J.The study of teaching.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1974.
6.
ElamS. (Ed.) Performance-based teacher education: What is the state of the art?Washington, D. C.: AACTE, Committee on Performance-Based Teacher Education,1971.
7.
FrickT., & SemmelM.Observational records: Observer agreement and reliabilities.Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped, 1974.
8.
HeathR. W., & NeilsonM. A.The myth of performance-based teacher education.New Orleans: Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association,February, 1973.
9.
HoustonW. R., & HowsomR. B. (Eds.). Competency-based teacher education progress, problems and prospects.Chicago: Science Research Associates, Inc., 1972.
10.
HuntD. E.Matching models in education.Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education,1971.
11.
KreiderJ. M.The effect of computer-assisted teacher training system feed-back on increasing teacher use of pupil ideas with EMR children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1969.
12.
MacciaE. S., & MacciaG. S.Development of educational theory derived from three educational theory models.U. S. Office of Education, Project No. 5-0638, Final report, December, 1966.
13.
MacciaE. S., & MacciaG. S.Educational theory developed through the SIGGS Theory Model. In Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis, Gent: Henri-Dunantlaan, VI/1, 1969.
14.
MacciaE. S., & MacciaG. S.Information theoretic extension of the cybernetic model and theory of education. Paper presented at the World Organization of General Systems and Cybernetics, University of Oxford, August 28-September 1, 1972.
15.
MorrisseyP. A., & SemmelM. I., Instructional models for the learning disabled.TIP: Theory Into Practice, 1975, 14, 2, 110–122.
16.
PisarchickS., SitkoM., & SemmelM.I.Raising the level of cognitive demand of EMR teachers.Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped (in preparation).
17.
RosenshineB.Teaching behaviors and student achievement.London: International Association for Evaluation of Educational Achievement,1971.
18.
RosnerB.The power of competency-based teacher education.Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.,1972.
19.
SchmittJ. K. S.Modifying questioning behavior of prospective teachers of mentally retarded children through a computer-assisted teacher training system (CATTS). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1969.
20.
SemmelM. I.Projects CATTS I: A computer-assisted teacher training system. In Van TreslaarA. P. (Ed.), Studies in language and language behavior VII.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Research in Language and Language Behavior, 1968.
21.
SemmelM. I.Toward the development of a computer-assisted teacher training system. In FlandersN., and NuthallG. (Eds.), The classroom behavior of teachers, 18, Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Education, 1972.
22.
SemmelM. I.Applications of systematic classroom observation to the study and modification of pupil-teacher interaction in special education. In WeinbergRichard, & WoodF. H. (Eds.), Observation of pupils and teachers in mainstream and special education settings: Alternative strategies.Minneapolis, Minn.: Leadership Training Institute in Special Education, University of Minneapolis, 1975.
23.
SemmelM. I., & FrickT.A general systems approach to train preservice special teachers in retroductive skills through systematic performance assessment of teaching-learning outcomes.Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped,1975.
24.
SemmelM. I., OlsonJ. L., & WeiskeW. M.An information and technical manual for the computer-assisted teacher training system (CATTS).Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped,1972.
25.
SemmelM. I., & SitkoM.The use of CATTS in a preservice special education teacher training program.Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped (in preparation).
26.
SemmelM. I., & SivasailamT.Observation systems and the special education teacher.Focus on Exceptional Children, 1973, 5, 7.
27.
ShavelsonR.What is a basic teaching skill?Journal of Teacher Education, 1973, 24, 144–151.
28.
SmithB. O. (Ed.) Research in teacher education: A symposium.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1971.
29.
SoarR.Teacher behavior related to pupil growth. In FlandersN., & NuthallG. (Eds.), The classroom behavior of teachers, 18, Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Education, 1972.
30.
ThiagarajanS., SemmelD. S., & SemmelM. I.Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Leadership Training Institute/Special Education,1974.
31.
VanEveryH. J. F.The application of a computer-assisted teacher training system to speech therapist training. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1971.
32.
WeaverP.Effects of a computer-assisted teacher training system and teacher expectancies on teacher-pupil verbal interactions with EMR children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1969.