This special series examines the application of open-science practices—particularly registered reports—to systematic reviews and meta-analyses in special education and synthesizes evidence for three widely used classroom interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD): self-determination interventions, time-out, and token economies. The series was motivated by gaps identified in prior mega-reviews and a broader concern about publication bias and methodological opacity in the review literature. Collectively, the papers highlight persistent methodological and reporting limitations and argue that broader adoption of open-science practices is essential to reduce bias, enhance replicability, and better inform equitable, scalable practices for students with EBD. Finally, in a concluding commentary, experts discuss the potential benefits and challenges of publishing systematic reviews as registered reports and offer practical recommendations.
BeahmL.CookB.IngvarssonE. (in press). Social validity in the token economy literature: A systematic literature review. Behavioral Disorders. Advanced online publication.
3.
BeahmL. A.CookB. G.McLucasA.EllisK.BradshawC. P. (2025). A systematic review of the evaluation of social validity in experimental examinations of tier 2 schoolwide positive behavior interventions. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 27(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007241230596
4.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
CookB. G.LloydJ. W.MellorD.NosekB. A.TherrienW. J. (2018). Promoting open science to increase the trustworthiness of evidence in special education. Exceptional Children, 85(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918793138
7.
CookB. G.TherrienW. J. (2017). Null effects and publication bias in special education research. Behavioral Disorders, 42(4), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742917709473
CummingM. M.BettiniE.ChowJ. C. (2023). High-quality systematic literature reviews in special education: Promoting coherence, contextualization, generativity, and transparency. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221146576
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100202
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
14.
KingS.DavidsonK.ChitiyoA.AppleD. (2020). Evaluating article search and selection procedures in special education literature reviews. Remedial and Special Education, 41(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518813142
15.
LeBlancL. A. (2020). Editor’s note: The power of big ideas. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.673
16.
LittellJ. H.WhiteH. (2018). The Campbell collaboration: Providing better evidence for a better world. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731517703748
17.
NelsonG.ParkS.BraffordT.HellerN. A.CrawfordA. R.DrakeK. R. (2022). Reporting quality in math meta-analyses for students with or at risk of disabilities. Exceptional Children, 88(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029211050851
RidenB. S.KummS.MagginD. M. (2022). Evidence-based behavior management strategies for students with or at risk of EBD: A mega review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 43(4), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211047947
ShadishW. R.ZelinskyN. A.VeveaJ. L.KratochwillT. R. (2016). A survey of publication practices of single-case design researchers when treatments have small or large effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49(3), 656–673. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.308
22.
ShahH. M.ChungK. C. (2009). Archie Cochrane and his vision for evidence-based medicine. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 124(3), 982–988. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b03928
23.
SindelarP. T.WilsonR. J. (1984). The potential effects of meta-analysis on special education practice. The Journal of Special Education, 18(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698401800109
24.
TalbottE.MagginD. M.Van AckerE. Y.KummS. (2018). Quality indicators for reviews of research in special education. Exceptionality, 26(4), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2017.1283625
25.
ThompsonB.DiamondK. E.McWilliamR.SnyderP.SnyderS. W. (2005). Evaluating the quality of evidence from correlational research for evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100204
26.
TincaniM.TraversJ. (2019). Replication research, publication bias, and applied behavior analysis. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 42(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00191-5
