A study using a multiple-baseline across participants design was conducted in a U.S. alternative education setting to examine the functional relation between students’ use of a technology-based graphic organizer (TBGO) with embedded self-regulated learning strategies on the quantity and quality of their persuasive essay writing. Three third- to fifth-grade students with writing difficulties and complex behavioral needs receiving services in an alternative special education program participated in the study. The dependent variables included the number of words, number of transition words, and writing quality scores across (a) baseline (writing on the computer without the TBGO), (b) TBGO-use phase (writing on a computer with the TBGO), and (c) maintenance (writing on the computer without the TBGO). The visual and statistical analyses of data indicated all participants improved the quality of their writing, and two students also increased the quantity of their writing across phases. Students’ self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in writing ratings were also monitored throughout the study. Results indicated an overall increase in their perceived self-efficacy for writing.
AhnS. Y. (2017). Using a mobile-based graphic organizer with embedded procedural facilitation for idea generation to support persuasive essay writing for middle school students with emotional and behavioral disorders [Doctoral thesis, George Mason University]. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2015669945/abstract/C7234575A274497CPQ/1
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, text revision (DSM-5-TR) (5th edition). Amer Psychiatric Pub Inc.
3.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
4.
BeckerS. P.PaterniteC. E.EvansS. W.AndrewsC.ChristensenO. A.KraanE. M.WeistM. D. (2011). Eligibility, assessment, and educational placement issues for students classified with emotional disturbance: Federal and state-level analyses. School Mental Health, 3(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-010-9045-2
5.
BruningR.DempseyM.KauffmanD. F.McKimC.ZumbrunnS. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029692
6.
CampbellA. R.Bowman-PerrottL.BurkeM. D.SalleseM. R. (2018). Reading, writing, math, and content-area interventions for improving behavioral and academic outcomes of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 16(2), 119–138. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1194543
7.
ChowJ. C.WehbyJ. H. (2018). Associations between language and problem behavior: A systematic review and correlational meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9385-z
8.
CiulloS.ReutebuchC. (2013). Computer-based graphic organizers for students with LD: A systematic review of literature. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(4), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12017
9.
Cuenca-CarlinoY.MustianA. L. (2013). Self-Regulated Strategy Development: Connecting persuasive writing to self-advocacy for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 39(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291303900102
10.
CurranF. C.BalA.GoffP.MitchellN. (2021). Estimating the relationship between special education de-identification for emotional disturbance and academic and school discipline outcomes: Evidence from Wisconsin’s longitudinal data. Education and Urban Society, 53(1), 83–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124520925053
11.
DuncanB. B.FornessS. R.HartsoughC. (1995). Students identified as seriously emotionally disturbed in school-based day treatment: Cognitive, psychiatric, and special education characteristics. Behavioral Disorders, 20(4), 238–252. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23887584
12.
EnnisR. P.EvanovichL. L.LosinskiM.JolivetteK.Kimball-GrebK. (2018). Behavioral, academic, and social characteristics of students with behavioral difficulties served in a residential facility. In CookB. G.LandrumT. J.TankersleyM. (Eds.), Emerging research and issues in behavioral disabilities (Vol. 30, pp. 93–111). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0735-004X20180000030007
13.
EnnisR. P.HarrisK. R.LaneK. L.MasonL. H. (2014). Lessons learned from implementing self-regulated strategy development with students with emotional and behavioral disorders in alternative educational settings. Behavioral Disorders, 40(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.68
14.
EnnisR. P.JolivetteK. (2014). Using self-regulated strategy development for persuasive writing to increase the writing and self-efficacy skills of students with emotional and behavioral disorders in health class. Behavioral Disorders, 40(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.26
15.
EnnisR. P.JolivetteK.BodenL. J. (2013). STOP and DARE: Self-regulated strategy development for persuasive writing with elementary students with E/BD in a residential facility. Education & Treatment of Children (West Virginia University Press), 36(3), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2013.0026
16.
EvmenovaA. S.ReganK.BoykinA.GoodK.HughesM.MacVittieN.SaccoD.AhnS. Y.ChirinosD. (2016). Emphasizing planning for essay writing with a computer-based graphic organizer. Exceptional Children, 82(2), 170–191. https://doi.org.mutex.gmu.edu/10.1177/0014402915591697
17.
EvmenovaA. S.ReganK.HutchisonA. (2020). AT for writing: Technology-based graphic organizers with embedded supports. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 52(4), 266–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059920907571
18.
FornessS. R.FreemanS. F.PaparellaT.KauffmanJ. M.WalkerH. M. (2012). Special education implications of point and cumulative prevalence for children with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611401624
19.
GageN. A.WilsonJ.Macsuga-GageA. S. (2014). Writing performance of students with emotional and/or behavioral disabilities. Behavioral Disorders, 40(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.3
20.
GarwoodJ. D.WertsM. G.MasonL. H.HarrisB.AustinM. B.CiulloS.MagnerK.KoppenhaverD. A.ShinM. (2019). Improving persuasive science writing for secondary students with emotional and behavioral disorders educated in residential treatment facilities. Behavioral Disorders, 44(4), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742918809341
21.
GoodK. E. (2019). The pen or the cursor: A single-subject comparison of a paper-based graphic organizer and a computer-based graphic organizer to support the persuasive writing of students with emotional and behavioral disorders or mild autism [Doctoral thesis, George Mason University]. Retrieved October 27, 2022, from https://www.proquest.com/docview/2240088128/abstract/CB61ABBDEDD44646PQ/1
22.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.MasonL. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(2), 207–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.08.001
23.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.McKeownD. (2014). The writing of students with learning disabilities, meta-analysis of self-regulated strategy development writing intervention studies, and future directions: Redux. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities, 2nd edition (pp. 405–438). The Guilford Press.
24.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (2016). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Policy implications of an evidence-based practice. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624216
HughesM. D.ReganK. S.EvmenovaA. (2019). A computer-based graphic organizer with embedded self-regulated learning strategies to support student writing. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451219833026
27.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) of 2004, 20 U.S.C., § 1400 et seq. (2004). Reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990.
28.
KauffmanJ. M.LandrumT. J. (2017). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (11th ed.). Pearson.
29.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. What Works Clearinghouse. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED510743
30.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M. (2010). Reading and writing interventions for students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders: An introduction. Behavioral Disorders, 35(2), 82–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291003500201
31.
LedfordJ. R.BartonE. E.SeveriniK. E.ZimmermanK. N. (2019). A primer on single-case research designs: Contemporary use and analysis. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 124(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-124.1.35
32.
LedfordJ. R.LambertJ. M.PustejovskyJ. E.ZimmermanK. N.HollinsN.BartonE. E. (2023). Single-case-design research in special education: Next-generation guidelines and considerations. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221137656
33.
LosinskiM.Cuenca-CarlinoY.ZablockiM.TeagardenJ. (2014). Examining the efficacy of self-regulated strategy development for students with emotional or behavioral disorders: A meta-analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 40(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.52
34.
MagginD. M.WehbyJ. H.FarmerT. W.BrooksD. S. (2016). Intensive interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Issues, theory, and future directions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 24(3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426616661498
35.
MagginD. M.WehbyJ. H.PartinT. C. M.RobertsonR.OliverR. M. (2011). A comparison of the instructional context for students with behavioral issues enrolled in self-contained and general education classrooms. Behavioral Disorders, 36(2), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291103600201
36.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E. (2014). Intensive instruction to improve writing for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 40(1), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.78
37.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E.CerarN. I.Allen-BronaughD.ThompsonC.GuckertM.LeinsP.HauthC.Cuenca-SanchezY. (2014). Fluent persuasive writing with counterarguments for students with emotional disturbance. The Journal of Special Education, 48(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466912440456
38.
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services, U.S. Department of Education. (2021). The 43rd annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2021.
39.
Oh-YoungC.FillerJ. (2015). A meta-analysis of the effects of placement on academic and social skill outcome measures of students with disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 47, 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.08.014
40.
PenningtonR. C.DelanoM. E. (2012). Writing instruction for students with autism spectrum disorders: A review of literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 27(3), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357612451318
41.
PorowskiA.O’ConnerR.LuoJ. L. (2014). How do states define alternative education (REL 2014–038). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
42.
ReganK. S.EvmenovaA. S.BoykinA.SaccoD.GoodK.AhnS. Y.MacVittieN.HughesM. D. (2017). Supporting struggling writers with class-wide teacher implementation of a computer-based graphic organizer. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(5), 428–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1221781
43.
ReganK. S.EvmenovaA. S.MergenR. L.VerbiestC.HutchisonA.MurnanR.FieldS.GafurovB. (2023). The feasibility of using virtual professional development to support teachers in making data-based decisions to improve students’ writing. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 38(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12301
44.
ReganK. S.MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E. (2005). Promoting expressive writing among students with emotional and behavioral: Disturbance via dialogue journals. Behavioral Disorders, 31(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290503100107
45.
ReidR.GonzalezJ. E.NordnessP. D.TroutA.EpsteinM. H. (2004). A meta-analysis of the academic status of students with emotional/behavioral disturbance. The Journal of Special Education, 38(3), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669040380030101
46.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.CastoG. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258700800206
47.
VannestK. J.ParkerR. I.GonenO.AdiguzelT. (2016). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. Texas A&M University. singlecaseresearch.org
48.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart1. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203
49.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson® III NU tests of achievement. Riverside Publishing Company.
50.
ZumbrunnS.BrodaM.VarierD.ConklinS. (2020). Examining the multidimensional role of self-efficacy for writing on student writing self-regulation and grades in elementary and high school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 580–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12315
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
