Expelled Students in Need of Special Education Services Using Bayes’ Theorem: Implications for the Social Maladjustment Clause?

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to determine the probability that a student with a disability not being served by Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) would be expelled. Expulsion data were obtained from the Civil Rights Data Collection produced by the U.S. Office of Civil Rights. The latest data from all 50 states and the District of Columbia for the 2017 to 2018 school year were analyzed. Bayes’ Theorem was used to determine this probability based upon existing probabilities and conditional probabilities. Analyses were also conducted by state and ethnicity. Results indicated that 1 in 14 of expelled students is likely to have an unserved disability under IDEA but variability according to race/ethnicity nationwide and by state was observed. Students who were White were the least likely to be an unserved student with a disability under IDEA among those expelled. The findings encourage investigation into the intersection of variables, especially the importance of including disability status and ethnicity when explaining disparate and punitive discipline. Practitioners, especially school psychologists, work at this intersection and can influence both special education identification and discipline practices.

Keywords

adjustment social policy issues disproportionate representation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

K. P.

(2021). The relationship between inclusion, absenteeism, and disciplinary outcomes for students with disabilities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 43(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720968558

Arnold

L. E.

Hodgkins

Kahle

Madhoo

Kewley

(2020). Long-term outcomes of ADHD: Academic achievement and performance. Journal of Attention Disorders, 24(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054714566076

Barnard-Brak

Stevens

Robinson

Holt

(2013). School psychologist diagnostic decision-making: A pilot study. Psychology in the Schools, 50(6), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21694

Bateman

Yell

. (2019). Free appropriate public education: The essence of special education. In Bateman

Yell

(Eds.), Current trends and legal issues in special education (pp. 80–91). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071800539

Becker

S. P.

Paternite

C. E.

Evans

S. W.

Andrews

Christensen

O. A.

Kraan

E. M.

Weist

M. D.

(2011). Eligibility, assessment, and educational placement issues for students classified with emotional disturbance: Federal and state-level analyses. School Mental Health, 3(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-010-9045-2

Blackwell

Durán

J. B.

Buss

(2019). Students with emotional and behavioral disorders and special education due process in the United States. International Journal of Special Education, 34(1), 129–151.

Blasco

P. M.

Guy

Saxton

S. N.

Duvall

S. W.

(2017). Are we missing a vulnerable population in early intervention? Infants & Young Children, 30(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1097/iyc.0000000000000097

Bowman-Perrott

Benz

M. R.

Hsu

H.-Y.

Kwok

O.-M.

Eisterhold

L. A.

Zhang

(2013). Patterns and predictors of disciplinary exclusion over time: An analysis of the SEELS national dataset. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 21, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611407501

Bradley

Doolittle

Bartolotta

(2008). Building on the data and adding to the discussion: The experiences and outcomes of students with emotional disturbance. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-007-9058-6

10.

Bruhn

A. L.

Woods-Groves

Huddle

(2014). A preliminary investigation of emotional and behavioral screening practices in K–12 schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(4), 611–634. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2014.0039

11.

Christle

C. A.

Jolivette

Nelson

C. M.

(2005). Breaking the school to prison pipeline: Identifying school risk and protective factors for youth delinquency. Exceptionality, 13(2), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex1302_2

12.

Civil Rights Data Collection. (2021). Master list of definitions. U.S. Office of Civil Rights.

13.

Cohen

(1988). The effect size index: d. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2, 284–288.

14.

Cloth

A. H.

Evans

S. W.

Becker

S. P.

Paternite

C. E.

(2014). Social maladjustment and special education: State regulations and continued controversy. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22(4), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426613487405

15.

Committee on School Health. (2003). Out-of-school suspension and expulsion. Pediatrics, 112(5), 1206–1209. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.5.1206

16.

Council for Children With Behavioral Disorders. (1989). A new proposed definition and terminology to replace “serious emotional disturbance” in education of the handicapped act. Author.

17.

Crepeau-Hobson

Leech

(2022). Disciplinary and nondisciplinary outcomes of school-based threat assessment in Colorado schools. School Psychology Review, 51, 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1842716

18.

Decker

J. R.

Pazey

B. L.

(2017). Case-based instruction to teach educators about the legal parameters surrounding the discipline of students with disabilities. Action in Teacher Education, 39(3), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2017.1292160

19.

Dee

Gershenson

(2017). Unconscious bias in the classroom: Evidence and opportunities, 2017. Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis.

20.

Dietz

Montague

(2006). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder comorbid with emotional and behavioral disorders and learning disabilities in adolescents. Exceptionality, 14(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex1401_3

21.

Edge

M. D.

(2019). Statistical thinking from scratch: A primer for scientists. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198827627.001.0001

22.

Edwards

N. M.

Kaiser

Stapel-Wax

J. L.

(2021). Investigating a “wait and see” mindset among pediatric health care providers: Missed opportunities to refer toddlers with autism spectrum disorder to part C early intervention. Infants & Young Children, 34(4), 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1097/iyc.0000000000000201

23.

Fabelo

Thompson

M. D.

Plotkin

Carmichael

Marchbanks

M. P.

Booth

E. A.

(2011). Breaking schools’ rules: A statewide study of how school discipline relates to students’ success and juvenile justice involvement. Council of State Governments Justice Center.

24.

Fadus

M. C.

Valadez

E. A.

Bryant

B. E.

Garcia

A. M.

Neelon

Tomko

R. L.

Squeglia

L. M.

(2021). Racial disparities in elementary school disciplinary actions: Findings from the ABCD study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 60(8), 998–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.11.017

25.

Flower

McKenna

J. W.

Haring

C. D.

(2017). Behavior and classroom management: Are teacher preparation programs really preparing our teachers? Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(2), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1231109

26.

Forness

S. R.

Freeman

S. F.

Paparella

Kauffman

J. M.

Walker

H. M.

(2012). Special education implications of point and cumulative prevalence for children with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611401624

27.

Forness

S. R.

Knitzer

(1992). A new proposed definition and terminology to replace “serious emotional disturbance” in Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. School Psychology Review, 21, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1992.12085587

28.

Friedman

R. M.

Katz-Leavy

J. W.

Manderscheid

R. W.

Sondheimer

D. L.

(1996). Prevalence of serious emotional disturbance in children and adolescents. Mental Health, United States, 996, 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/e375732004-006

29.

Gage

N. A.

Katsiyannis

Carrero

K. M.

Miller

Pico

(2020). Exploring disproportionate discipline for Latinx students with and without disabilities: A national analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 47(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742920961356

30.

Gage

N. A.

Whitford

D. K.

Katsiyannis

Adams

Jasper

(2019). National analysis of the disciplinary exclusion of black students with and without disabilities. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(7), 1754–1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01407-7

31.

Green

A. L.

Cohen

D. R.

Stormont

(2019). Addressing and preventing disproportionality in exclusionary discipline practices for students of color with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(4), 241–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451218782437

32.

Hanchon

T. A.

Allen

R. A.

(2013). Identifying students with emotional disturbance: School psychologists’ practices and perceptions. Psychology in the Schools, 50(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21668

33.

Hepburn

S. L.

(2019). Educational identification of students with serious emotional disability and/or autism spectrum disorder: How current practices perpetuate disproportionality. International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities, 57, 49–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irrdd.2019.08.002

34.

Hurwitz

Cohen

E. D.

Perry

B. L.

(2021). Special education is associated with reduced odds of school discipline among students with disabilities. Educational Researcher, 50(2), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20982589

35.

Hutchison

C. B.

(2018). Re-thinking disproportionality in special education as a self-fulfilling prophecy. Insights into Learning Disabilities, 15(2), 113–116.

36.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004). https://sites.ed.gov/idea/statute-chapter-33/subchapter-i/1400

37.

Johnson

Jabbari

Williams

Marcucci

(2019). Disparate impacts: Balancing the need for safe schools with racial equity in discipline. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(2), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732219864707

38.

Kim

B. K. E.

Johnson

Rhinehart

Logan-Greene

Lomeli

Nurius

P. S.

(2021). The school-to-prison pipeline for probation youth with special education needs. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 91(3), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000538

39.

Kimball

E. W.

Wells

R. S.

Ostiguy

B. J.

Manly

C. A.

Lauterbach

A. A.

(2016). Students with disabilities in higher education: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research. In Paulsen

(Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 91–156). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26829-3_3

40.

Knudsen

M. E.

Bethune

K. S.

(2018). Manifestation determinations: An interdisciplinary guide to best practices. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50(3), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059917745653

41.

Landrum

T. J.

(2017). Emotional and behavioral disorders. In Kaufman

J. M.

Hallahan

D. P.

Pullen

P. C.

(Eds.), Handbook of special education (2nd ed., pp. 312–324). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315517698-26

42.

Losen

D. J.

Keith

M. A.

Hodson

C. L.

Martinez

T. E.

(2016). Charter schools, civil rights and school discipline: A comprehensive review. https://escholarship.org/content/qt65x5j31h/qt65x5j31h.pdf

43.

Macy

Marks

Towle

(2014). Missed, misused, or mismanaged: Improving early detection systems to optimize child outcomes. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34(2), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121414525997

44.

Magyar

C. I.

Pandolfi

(2012). Considerations for establishing a multi-tiered problem-solving model for students with autism spectrum disorders and comorbid emotional–behavioral disorders. Psychology in the Schools, 49(10), 975–987. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21645

45.

Mallett

C. A.

(2017). The school-to-prison pipeline: Disproportionate impact on vulnerable children and adolescents. Education and Urban Society, 49(6), 563–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124516644053

46.

Mallett

C. A.

Stoddard-Dare

Workman-Crewnshaw

(2011). Special education disabilities and juvenile delinquency: A unique challenge for school social work. School Social Work Journal, 36(1), 26–40.

47.

Martinez

M. J.

(2020). Does school racial composition matter to teachers: Examining racial differences in teachers’ perceptions of student problems. Urban Education, 55(7), 992–1020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918770709

48.

Mediratta

Rausch

M. K.

(2016). Introduction. In Skiba

R. J.

Mediratta

Rausch

M. K.

(Eds.), Inequality in school discipline: Research and practice to reduce disparities (pp. 3–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51257-4_1

49.

Merrell

K. W.

Walker

H. M.

(2004). Deconstructing a definition: Social maladjustment versus emotional disturbance and moving the EBD field forward. Psychology in the Schools, 41(8), 899–910. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20046

50.

Mitchell

B. S.

Kern

Conroy

M. A.

(2019). Supporting students with emotional or behavioral disorders: State of the field. Behavioral Disorders, 44(2), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742918816518

51.

Morris

E. W.

Perry

B. L.

(2016). The punishment gap: School suspension and racial disparities in achievement. Social Problems, 63(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spv026

52.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Digest of education statistics, 2019 (NCES 2021-009). National Research Council.

53.

Neca

Borges

M. L.

Pinto

P. C.

(2020). Teachers with disabilities: A literature review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(12), 1192–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1776779

54.

Office of Civil Rights. (2022). Supporting students with disabilities and avoiding the discriminatory use of student discipline under section 504 of the rehabilitation act of 1973. U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/504-discipline-guidance.pdf

55.

Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (2021). IDEA section 618 data products: State level data files. https://data.ed.gov/dataset/idea-section-618-data-products-state-level-data-files

56.

Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (2022). Questions and answers: Addressing the needs of children with disabilities and IDEA’s discipline provisions. U.S. Department of Education. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/files/qa-addressing-the-needs-of-children-with-disabilities-and-idea-discipline-provisions.pdf

57.

Olympia

Farley

Christiansen

Pettersson

Jenson

Clark

(2004). Social maladjustment and students with behavioral and emotional disorders: Revisiting basic assumptions and assessment issues. Psychology in the Schools, 41(8), 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20040

58.

Peguero

A. A.

Varela

K. S.

Marchbanks

M. P. T.

III Blake

Eason

J. M.

(2021). School punishment and education: Racial/ethnic disparities with grade retention and the role of urbanicity. Urban Education, 56(2), 228–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918801433

59.

Pescosolido

B. A.

Fettes

D. L.

Martin

J. K.

Monahan

McLeod

J. D.

(2007). Perceived dangerousness of children with mental health problems and support for coerced treatment. Psychiatric Services, 58(5), 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2007.58.5.619

60.

Pigott

Stearns

A. E.

Khey

D. N.

(2018). School resource officers and the school to prison pipeline: Discovering trends of expulsions in public schools. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(1), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9412-8

61.

Pinborough-Zimmerman

Satterfield

Miller

Bilder

Hossain

McMahon

(2007). Communication disorders: Prevalence and comorbid intellectual disability, autism, and emotional/behavioral disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(4), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2007/039)

62.

Piscitello

Kim

Y. K.

Orooji

Robison

(2022). Sociodemographic risk, school engagement, and community characteristics: A mediated approach to understanding high school dropout. Children and Youth Services Review, 133, 106347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106347

63.

Rafa

(2018). Suspension and expulsion. Education Commission of the States. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED581500.pdf

64.

Rafa

(2019). The status of school discipline in state policy. Education Commission of the States. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED592549.pdf

65.

Redding

(2019). A teacher like me: A review of the effect of student–teacher racial/ethnic matching on teacher perceptions of students and student academic and behavioral outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 89(4), 499–535. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319853545

66.

Robison

Jaggers

Rhodes

Blackmon

B. J.

Church

(2017). Correlates of educational success: Predictors of school dropout and graduation for urban students in the Deep South. Children and Youth Services Review, 73, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.11.031

67.

Rosenberg

J. M.

Kubsch

Wagenmakers

E. J.

Dogucu

(2022). Making sense of uncertainty in the science classroom. Science & Education, 31, 1239–1262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00341-3

68.

Ryan

T. G.

Goodram

(2013). The impact of exclusionary discipline on students. International Journal of Progressive Education, 9(3), 169–177.

69.

Scardamalia

Bentley-Edwards

K. L.

Grasty

(2019). Consistently inconsistent: An examination of the variability in the identification of emotional disturbance. Psychology in the Schools, 56(4), 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22213

70.

Shedd

(2015). Unequal city: Race, schools, and perceptions of injustice. Russell SAGE Foundation.

71.

Skiba

R. J.

Arredondo

M. I.

Williams

N. T.

(2014). More than a metaphor: The contribution of exclusionary discipline to a school-to-prison pipeline. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(4), 546–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2014.958965

72.

Skiba

R. J.

Poloni-Staudinger

Simmons

A. B.

Renae Feggins-Azziz

Chung

C. G.

(2005). Unproven links: Can poverty explain ethnic disproportionality in special education? The Journal of Special Education, 39(3), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050390030101

73.

Smith

E. J.

Harper

S. R.

(2015). Disproportionate impact of K-12 school suspension and expulsion on Black students in southern states. https://race.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Pub-14-Smith-and-Harper.pdf

74.

Speekenbrink

(2021). Statistics: Data analysis and modelling. https://mspeekenbrink.github.io/sdam-book/ch-Bayes-factors.html#fundamentals-of-bayesian-inference

75.

Stevens

Barnard-Brak

Jackson

(2021). School resource officers’ roles differ in the prediction of nonviolent and serious violent incidents. School Psychology Review, 50, 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1886837

76.

Suh

(2007). Risk factors and levels of risk for high school dropouts. Professional School Counseling, 10(3), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759x0701000312

77.

Sullivan

A. L.

Bal

(2013). Disproportionality in special education: Effects of individual and school variables on disability risk. Exceptional Children, 79(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900406

78.

Sullivan

A. L.

Sadeh

S. S.

(2014). Differentiating social maladjustment from emotional disturbance: An analysis of case law. School Psychology Review, 43(4), 450–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2014.12087415

79.

Sullivan

A. L.

Van Norman

E. R.

Klingbeil

D. A.

(2014). Exclusionary discipline of students with disabilities: Student and school characteristics predicting suspension. Remedial and Special Education, 35(4), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513519825

80.

Swaby

(2020, November 5). Texas schools still failing special education students, federal review finds. The Texas Tribune. https://www.texastribune.org/2020/11/05/texas-schools-failing-special-education-students/

81.

Tapia

Blalock

Choi

Ochoa

(2021). Dropout and incarceration: Extending the School-to-Prison Pipeline (STPP) construct. Justice Policy Journal, 17(2), 1–24.

82.

Togut

T. D.

(2011). The gestalt of the school-to-prison pipeline: The duality of overrepresentation of minorities in special education and racial disparity in school discipline eon minorities. American University Journal of Gender Social Policy & the Law, 20, 163–177.

83.

Van De Schoot

Winter

S. D.

Ryan

Zondervan-Zwijnenburg

Depaoli

(2017). A systematic review of Bayesian articles in psychology: The last 25 years. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000100

84.

Vega

(2022). Emotional disturbance/emotional disorders. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367198459-reprw142-1

85.

Walker

J. D.

Brigham

F. J.

(2017). Manifestation determination decisions and students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 25(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426616628819

86.

Wiley

Siperstein

(2011). Seeing red, feeling blue: The impact of state political leaning on state identification rates for emotional disturbance. Behavioral Disorders, 36(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291003600305

87.

Zirkel

P. A.

Weathers

J. M.

(2016). K–12 students eligible solely under Section 504: Updated national incidence data. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 27(2), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207315626115

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.09 MB