The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of MoBeGo, a mobile self-monitoring app, on the initial and sustained academic engagement and disruptive behavior of third- to eighth-grade students with challenging behavior. Student–teacher pairs (N = 57) were randomly assigned to the treatment (MoBeGo) or control (business-as-usual) condition. We conducted systematic direct observation of students’ behavior throughout prebaseline, baseline, intervention, and postintervention conditions of the study. Multivariate multilevel models revealed differential improvement for the MoBeGo group in student outcomes (less disruptive behavior; more academic engagement) from baseline to intervention, as well as successful postintervention effects for disruptive behavior. Limitations, future directions, and implications for practice are discussed.
AchenbachT. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist / 4-18 and 1991 profile. Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
2.
BanduraA. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
3.
BedesemP. (2012). Using cell phone technology for self-monitoring procedures in inclusive settings. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(4),33–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341202700403
4.
BrieschA. M.BrieschJ. M. (2016). Meta-analysis of behavioral self-management interventions in single-case research. School Psychology Review, 45(1),3–18. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR45-1.3-18
5.
BrieschA. M.DanielsB.BenevilleM. (2019). Unpacking the term “self-management”: Understanding intervention applications within the school-based literature. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28(1),54–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9303-1
6.
BruhnA. L.BarronS.CopelandB.EstrapalaS.RilaA.WehbyJ. (2021). Brief report: Comparing teacher and student ratings within a self-monitoring intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 46(4),316–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508420944231
7.
BruhnA. L.GilmourA.RilaA.HancockE.Van CampA.ShaefferA.FernandoJ.WehbyJ. (2022). Treatment components and participant characteristics associated with outcomes in self-monitoring interventions. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 24, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300720946651
8.
BruhnA. L.McDanielS.KreighC. (2015). Self-monitoring interventions for students with behavior problems: A review of current research. Behavioral Disorders, 40(2),102–121. https://doi.org/10.17988/BD-13-45.1
9.
BruhnA. L.RilaA.MahatmyaD.EstrapalaS.HendrixN. (2020). The effects of data-based, individualized interventions for behavior. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 28(1),3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426618806279
10.
BruhnA. L.WillsH. (2018). The emerging research on and development of technology-based self-monitoring. In LandrumT.CookB.TankersleyM. (Eds.), Emerging research and issues in behavioral disabilities (Vol. 30, pp. 51–68). Emerald Group.
11.
BruhnA. L.Woods-GrovesS.FernandoJ.ChoiT.TroughtonL. (2017). Evaluating technology-based self-monitoring as a tier 2 intervention across middle school settings. Behavioral Disorders, 42(3),119–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742917691534
12.
Cadmus-BertramL. A.MarcusB. H.PattersonR. E.ParkerB. A.MoreyB. L. (2015). Randomized trial of a Fitbit-based physical activity intervention for women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(3),414–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.01.020
13.
CrutchfieldS. A.MasonR. A.ChambersA.WillsH. P.MasonB. A. (2015). Use of a self-monitoring application to reduce stereotypic behavior in adolescents with autism: A preliminary investigation of I-Connect. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(5),1146–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2272-x
14.
EstrapalaS.RilaA.BruhnA. L. (2018). Don’t quit cold-turkey: Systematic fading to promote sustained behavioral change. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 511(1),54–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918790567
15.
GageN. A.ScottT.HirnR.MacSuga-GageA. S. (2018). The relationship between teachers’ implementation of classroom management practices and student behavior in elementary school. Behavioral Disorders, 43(2),302–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742917714809
16.
GoodmanR. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(11),1337–1345. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015
17.
GulchakD. J. (2008). Using a mobile handheld computer to teach a student with an emotional and behavioral disorder to self-monitor attention. Education & Treatment of Children, 31, 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0028
KirkpatrickM.RiveraG.AkersJ. (2020). Systematic review of behavioral interventions using digital technology to reduce problem behavior in the classroom. Journal of Behavioral Education, 31, 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09406-1
20.
LevineJ. C.BurnsE.WhittleJ.FlemingR.KnudsonP.FlaxS.LeventhalH. (2016). Randomized trial of technology-assisted self-monitoring of blood glucose by low-income seniors: Improved glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 39(6),1001–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-016-9763-5
21.
McDougallD.HeineR. C.WileyL. A.SheeheyM. D.SakanashiK. K.CookB. G.CookL. (2017). Meta-analysis of behavioral self-management techniques used by students with disabilities in inclusive settings. Behavioral Interventions, 32(4),399–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1491
22.
PasE. T.BradshawC. P.MitchellM. M. (2011). Examining the validity of office discipline referrals as an indicator of student behavior problems. Psychology in the Schools, 48(6),541–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20577
23.
RosenbloomR.WillsH. P.MasonR.HuffmanJ. M.MasonB. A. (2019). The effects of a technology-based self-monitoring intervention on on-task, disruptive, and task-completion behaviors for adolescents with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(12),5047–5062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04209-4
24.
SheffieldK.WallerR. J. (2010). A review of single-case studies utilizing self-monitoring interventions to reduce problem classroom behaviors. Beyond Behavior, 19(2), 7–13.
25.
SpragueJ.WalkerH. (2000). Early identification and intervention for youth with antisocial and violent behavior. Exceptional Children, 66, 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290006600307
26.
SzwedK.BouckE. C. (2013). Clicking away: Repurposing student response systems to lesson off-task behavior. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341302800201
27.
TappJ. T.WehbyJ. H.EllisD. N. (1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 27, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203616
28.
Turner-McGrievyG. M.BeetsM. W.MooreJ. B.KaczynskiA. T.Barr-AndersonD. J.TateD. F. (2013). Comparison of traditional versus mobile app self-monitoring of physical activity and dietary intake among overweight adults participating in an mHealth weight loss program. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(3),513–518. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001510
29.
WakschlagL. S.PerlmanS. B.BlairR. J.LeibenluftE.Briggs-GowanM. J.PineD. S. (2017). The neurodevelopmental basis of early childhood disruptive behavior: Irritable and callous phenotypes as exemplars. American Journal of Psychiatry, 175(2), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17010045
30.
WillsH. P.MasonB. A. (2014). Implementation of a self-monitoring application to improve on-task behavior: A high-school pilot study. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23(4), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-014-9204-x
31.
WittJ. C.ElliotS. N. (1985a). Children’s intervention rating profile: Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In KratochwillT. R. (Ed.), Advances in school Psychology (pp. 251–288). Erlbaum.
32.
WittJ. C.ElliotS. N. (1985b). Intervention rating profile-15: Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In KratochwillT. R. (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (pp. 251–288). Erlbaum.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
