Data-based individualization (DBI) is a process of collecting and analyzing data on students’ response to intervention and then making intervention adaptations accordingly. Although this process can lead to better student outcomes, very few teachers are trained in the components of DBI, particularly in relation to behavior. Improving practice requires not only ongoing professional development but also understanding about how teachers’ experiences in training can lead to better outcomes. Within the context of implementing a behavior intervention, the purpose of this study was to evaluate how participating in ongoing professional development on DBI affects teachers’ perceptions of themselves in relation to the DBI framework over time. Using a convergent, parallel mixed-methods research design, we evaluated the conceptual understanding, self-efficacy, and perceptions associated with DBI before, during, and after professional development of 16 general and special education teachers. Data analysis indicated teachers reported significant improvements in all three areas over time. Qualitative data indicated active practice and collaboration with other professionals contributed to these improvements. Key findings, limitations, and future directions are discussed.
AloeA. M.AmoL. C.ShanahanM. E. (2014). Classroom management self-efficacy and burnout: A multivariate meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 101–126.
2.
ArmstrongJ.AnthesK. (2001). How data can help. American School Board Journal, 188(11), 38–41.
3.
BeamH. D.MuellerT. G. (2017). What do educators know, do, and think about behavior? An analysis of special and general educators’ knowledge of evidence-based behavioral interventions. Preventing School Failure, 61, 1–13.
4.
BradleyR.DoolittleJ.BartolottaR. (2008). Building on the data and adding to the discussion: The experiences and outcomes of students with emotional disturbance. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17(1), 4–23.
5.
BruceC. D.EsmondeI.RossJ.DookieL.BeattyR. (2010). The effects of sustained classroom-embedded teacher professional learning on teacher efficacy and related student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1598–1608.
6.
BruhnA. L.FreemanJ.HirnR.KernL. (2018). High-leverage practices: Feedback. In McLeskeyJ.MaheadyL.BillingsleyB.BrownellM.LewisT. J. (Eds.), High-leverage practices for inclusive classrooms (pp. 107–119). Routledge.
7.
BruhnA. L.RilaA.MahatmyaD.EstrapalaS.HendrixN. (2018). Analyzing the effects of data-based, individualized interventions using multilevel modeling and visual analysis. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1063426618806279
CreamerE. G. (2017). An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. SAGE.
11.
CreswellJ. A.ClarkV. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
12.
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–199.
13.
DunnK. E.AirolaD. T.LoW.GarrisonM. (2013). Becoming data driven: The influence of teachers’ sense of efficacy on concerns related to data-driven decision making. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81, 222–241.
14.
FeilzerM. Y. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6–16.
15.
FornessS. R.KimJ.WalkerH. M. (2012). Prevalence of students with EBD: Impact on general education. Beyond Behavior, 21, 3–9.
16.
FreemanJ.SimonsenB.BriereD. E.MacSuga-GageA. S. (2014). Pre-service teacher training in classroom management: A review of state accreditation policy and teacher preparation programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37, 106–120.
17.
HubertyC. J.MorrisJ. D. (1989). Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 302–308.
18.
IngersollR. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499–534.
19.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
20.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J.TurnerL. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112–133.
21.
JonesM. L. (2009). A study of novice special educators’ views of evidence-based practices. Teacher and Teacher Education, 32, 101–120.
22.
KernL.WehbyJ. H. (2014). Using data-based individualization to intensify behavioral interventions: Implementation example. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46, 45–53.
23.
KurasakiK. S. (2000). Intercoder reliability for validating conclusions drawn from open-ended interview data. Field Methods, 12, 179–194.
24.
LaneK. L.MenziesH.BruhnA. L.CrnoboriM. (2011). Managing challenging behaviors in schools: Research-based strategies that work. Guilford Press.
25.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.PowersL.DieboldT.GermerK.CommonE. A.BrunstingN. (2015). Improving teachers’ knowledge of functional assessment-based interventions: Outcomes of a professional development series. Education and Treatment of Children, 38, 93–120.
26.
MalterudK.SiersmaV. D.GuassoraA. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26, 1753–1760.
27.
MorseJ. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120–123.
28.
NicholsB. W.SingerK. P. (2000). Developing data mentors. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 34–37.
29.
O’BrienR. G.KaiserM. K. (1985). MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: An extensive primer. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 316–333.
30.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.CorriganJ. A. (2014). Improving the quality of multiple methods research reports in the field of human resource development and beyond: A call for rigor as an ethical practice. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25, 273–299.
31.
RossJ. A.BruceC. D. (2007). Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 146–159.
32.
SaldañaJ. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
33.
SteckerP.FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795–819.
34.
StormontM.ReinkeW.HermanK. (2011). Teachers’ knowledge of evidence-based interventions and available school resources for children with emotional and behavioral problems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 138–147.
35.
Tschannen-MoranM.HoyA. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805.
36.
WaymanJ. C. (2005). Involving teachers in data-driven decision making: Using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10, 295–308.
37.
WittJ. C.ElliotS. N. (1985). Intervention rating profile-15: Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In KratochwillT. R. (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (pp. 251–288). Lawrence Erlbaum.
