Behavior-focused alternative schools serve students who are identified by school personnel as exhibiting behavior difficulties, often coupled with low academic achievement. Students can be referred to behavior-focused alternative schools as an alternative to expulsion. In this study, we examined the demographic characteristics of students who attended behavior-focused alternative middle schools, as well as the effectiveness of these schools on two outcomes: (a) standardized state reading assessment scores and (b) number of suspensions received. Using a retrospective cohort design study, we investigated whether students attending behavior-focused alternative middle schools experienced significantly different reading and suspension outcomes compared with a matched sample of students attending traditional middle schools. The majority of students in behavior-focused alternative middle schools were male, Black, and receiving special education services. Results showed that students attending behavior-focused alternative middle schools performed significantly lower on standardized assessments of reading in the eighth grade. No significant differences were noted for the number of suspensions experienced.
Allen-DeBoerR. A.MalmgrenK. W.GlassM. E. (2006). Reading instruction for youth with emotional and behavioral disorders in a juvenile correctional facility. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 18–28.
2.
ArciaE. (2007). A comparison of elementary/K-8 and middle schools’ suspension rates. Urban Education, 42, 456–469. doi:10.1177/0042085907304879
3.
AronL. Y. (2006). An overview of alternative education. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
4.
BalA.AfacanK.CakirH. I. (2018). Culturally responsive school discipline: Implementing learning lab at a high school for systemic transformation. American Educational Research Journal, 55, 1007–1050. doi:10.3102/0002831218768796
5.
BalA.KozleskiE. B.SchraderE. M.RodriguezE. M.PeltonS. (2014). Systemic transformation from the ground–up: Using learning lab to design culturally responsive schoolwide positive behavioral supports. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 327–339. doi:10.1177/0741932514536995
6.
BalA.SchraderE.AfacanK.MaweneD. (2016). Using learning labs for culturally responsive positive behavioral interventions and supports. Interventions in School and Clinic, 52, 122–128. doi:10.1177/1053451216636057
7.
BalfanzR.HerzogL.Mac IverD. J. (2007). Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middle-grades schools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist, 42, 223–235. doi:10.1080/00461520701621079
8.
CarverP. R.LewisL. (2010). Alternative schools and programs for public school students at risk of educational failure: 2007–08 (NCES 2010–026). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Government Printing Office.
9.
CheungY. B. (2002). Zero-inflated models for regression analysis of count data: A study of growth and development. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1461–1469. doi:10.1002/sim.1088
10.
ChiangH.GillB. (2010). Student characteristics and outcomes in alternative and neighborhood high schools in Philadelphia. Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Research.
11.
ConnersF. A. (2003). Reading skills and cognitive abilities of individuals with mental retardation. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 27, 191–229.
12.
DrameE. R. (2010). Measuring academic growth in students with disabilities in charter schools. Education and Urban Society, 42, 379–393. doi:10.1177/0013124510362031
13.
FlowerA.McDanielS. C.JolivetteK. (2011). A literature review of research quality and effective practices in alternative education settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 34, 489–510.
14.
FoleyR. M.PangL. S. (2006). Alternative education programs: Program and student characteristics. The High School Journal, 89, 10–21. doi:10.1353/hsj.2006.0003
15.
GagnonJ. C.GurelS.BarberB. R. (2017). State-level analysis of school punitive discipline practices in Florida. Behavioral Disorders, 42, 65–80.
16.
GuoS.FraserM. W. (2010). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
HernandezD. J. (2011). Double jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
18.
LassenS. R.SteeleM. M.SailorW. (2006). The relationship of school-wide positive behavior support to academic achievement in an urban middle school. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 701–712. doi:10.1002/pits.20177
19.
LehrC. (2004). Alternative schools and students with disabilities: Identifying and understanding the issues. Information Brief: Addressing Trends and Developments in Secondary Education and Transition, 3(6). Retrieved from https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/172844
20.
LehrC. A.LangeC. M. (2003). Alternative schools serving students with and without disabilities: What are the current issues and challenges?Preventing School Failure, 47, 59–65. doi:10.1080/10459880309604431
21.
LehrC. A.LannersE. J.LangeC. M. (2003). Alternative schools: Policy and legislation across the United States (Research Report 1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration.
22.
LehrC. A.TanC. S.YsseldykeJ. (2009). Alternative schools: A synthesis of state-level policy and research. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 19–32. doi:10.1177/0741932508315645
23.
MalmgrenK. W.LeoneP. E. (2000). Effects of a short-term auxiliary reading program on the reading skills of incarcerated youth. Education and Treatment of Children, 23, 239–247.
24.
Mason-WilliamsL.GagnonJ. C. (2017). An analysis of teacher sorting in secondary special education and alternative schools. The Journal of Special Education, 50, 239–250. doi:10.1177/0022466916656174
25.
McIntoshK.FlanneryK. B.SugaiG.BraunD.CochraneK. (2008). Relationships between academics and problem behavior in the transition from middle school to high school. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 243–255. doi:10.1177/1098300708318961
26.
MendezL. M. R.KnoffH. M. (2003). Who gets suspended from school and why: A demographic analysis of schools and disciplinary infractions in a large school district. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 30–51.
27.
MizelleN. B.IrvinJ. L. (2000). Transition from middle school to high school: What research says. Middle School Journal, 31, 57–61. doi:10.1080/00940771.2000.11494654
28.
PerzigianA. B.AfacanK.JustinW.WilkersonK. L. (2017). Characteristics of students in traditional versus alternative high schools: A cross-sectional analysis of enrollment in one urban district. Education and Urban Society, 49, 676–700. doi:10.1177/0013124516658520
29.
RaywidM. A. (1994). Alternative schools: The state of the art. Educational Leadership, 52, 26–31.
30.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55. doi:10.2307/2335942
31.
RuspiniE. (2002). Introduction to longitudinal research. New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
SkibaR. J.PetersonR. L.WilliamsT. (1997). Office referrals and suspension: Disciplinary intervention in middle schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 295–315.
TobinT. J.SugaiG. M. (1999). Using sixth-grade school records to predict school violence, chronic discipline problems, and high school outcomes. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 7, 40–53. doi:10.1177/106342669900700105
35.
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2012). Helping to ensure equal access to education: Report to the president and secretary of education, under section 203(b)(1) of the department of education organization act, FY 2009-12. Washington, DC: Author.
36.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs. (2016). 38th annual report to congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2016/parts-b-c/38th-arc-for-idea.pdf
37.
VincentC. G.TobinT. J. (2011). The relationship between implementation of school-wide positive behavior support (SWPBS) and disciplinary exclusion of students from various ethnic backgrounds with and without disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 19, 217–232. doi:10.1177/1063426610377329
38.
WilkersonK. L.AfacanK.PerzigianA. B.JustinW.LequiaJ. (2016). Behavior focused alternative schools: Impact on student outcomes. Behavioral Disorders, 41, 81–94. doi:10.17988/0198-7429-41.2.81
39.
WilkersonK. L.AfacanK.YanM.JustinW.DatarS. (2016). Academic remediation focused alternative schools: Impact on student outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 67–77. doi:10.1177/0741932515620842
40.
WilkersonK. L.GagnonJ. C.MelekogluM. A.CakirogluO. (2012). Reading instruction in secondary day treatment and residential schools for youth with emotional or behavioral disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 78–88. doi:10.1177/0741932510364546
