In this retrospective commentary on “Acceptability of Behavioral Interventions Used in Classrooms: The Influence of Amount of Teacher Time, Severity of Behavior Problem, and Type of Intervention,” I first examine the concept of social validity and related measurement challenges per Wolf’s concerns about consumers’ subjective reactions to behavior intervention procedures. I claim the genesis of the treatment acceptability research that others and I have completed was primarily motivated to advance the measurement of a subjective and fundamental construct in the process of selecting and implementing interventions in classrooms with teachers and children. With this background, I briefly describe the featured school-focused treatment acceptability study, followed by inferences about its (a) impact on subsequent intervention research and (b) relationship with common behavioral consultation and health care practices. I conclude with some speculations about future acceptability research and the importance of psychologists and educators caring about the social validity of their services.
CarterS. L. (2007). Review of recent treatment acceptability research. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 301–316. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.19.1.68
2.
ElliottS. N. (1986). Children’s ratings of the acceptability of classroom interventions for misbehavior: Findings and methodological considerations. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 23–35. doi:10.1016/0022-4405(86)90039-7
3.
ElliottS. N. (1988a). Acceptability of behavioral treatments in educational settings. In WittJ. C.ElliottS. N.GreshamF. M. (Eds.), The handbook of behavior therapy in education (pp. 121–150). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
4.
ElliottS. N. (1988b). Acceptability of behavioral treatments: A review of variables that influence treatment selection. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 68–80.
5.
ElliottS. N.TurcoT. L.GreshamF. M. (1987). Consumers’ and clients’ pretreatment acceptability ratings of classroom-based group contingencies. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 145–154. doi:10.1016/0022-4405(87)90023-9
6.
ElliottS. N.Von BrockM. B. (1991). The behavior intervention rating scale: Development and validation of a pretreatment acceptability and effectiveness measure. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 43–51. doi:10.1016/0022-4405(91)90014-I
7.
ElliottS. N.Von BrockM. B.RobertsonS. L. (1991). Acceptance of response cost methods: Teachers’ and psychologists’ reactions. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 7, 1–15. doi:10.1177/082957359100700101
8.
ElliottS. N.WittJ. C.GalvinG. A.MoeG. L. (1986). Children’s involvement in intervention selection: Acceptability of interventions for misbehaving peers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 235–241. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.17.3.235
9.
ElliottS. N.WittJ. C.GalvinG. A.PetersonR. (1984). Acceptability of positive and reductive behavioral interventions: Factors that influence teachers’ decisions. Journal of School Psychology, 22, 353–360. doi:10.1016/0022-4405(84)90022-0
10.
ErchalW.P.MartensB.K. (2012). School consultation: Conceptual and empirical bases of practice (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.
11.
ErchulW.SheridanS. S. (2014). Handbook of research in school consultation. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
FixsenD. L.BlaseK. A. (2009, January). Implementation: The missing link between research and practice (NIRN Implementation Brief, #1). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham, National Implementation Research Network.
13.
KazdinA. E. (1980). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 259–273. doi:10.1901/jaba.1980.13-259
14.
KelleyM. L.GraceN.ElliottS. N. (1990). Acceptance of positive and punitive discipline methods: Comparison among abusive, potentially abusive, and non-abusive parents. Child Abuse & Neglect: The International Journal, 14, 219–226. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(90)90032-O
15.
KratochwillT.R.Von SomerenK.R. (1985). Barriers to treatment success in behavioral consultation: Current limitations and future directions. Journal of School Psychology, 23, 225–239.
16.
MartensB. K.WittJ. C.ElliottS. N.DarveauxD. X. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 191–198. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.16.2.191
17.
ReimersT. M.WackerD. P.KoepplG. (1987). Acceptability of behavioral treatments: A review of the literature. School Psychology Review, 16, 212–227.
18.
SanettiL. M. H.Collier-MeekM. A.FallonL. M. (2016). Fidelity with flexibility: Treatment acceptability and individualized adaptations of evidence-supported treatments. In MaltzmanS. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of treatment processes and outcomes in psychology: A multidisciplinary biopsychosocial approach (pp. 289–308). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
SekhonM.CartwrightM.FrancisJ. J. (2017). Acceptability of healthcare interventions: An overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Services Research, 17, Article 88. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8
20.
ShapiroE. E.EckertT. L. (1994). Acceptability of curriculum-based assessments by school psychologists. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 167–183. doi:10.1016/0022-4405(94)90009-4
21.
TassellN. A.HerbertA. M. L.EvansI. M.YoungP. (2012). Principles of indigenous ethics and psychological interventions. In LeachM. M.StevensM. J.LindsayG.FerreroA.KorkutY. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international psychological ethics (pp. 176–190). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
TurcoT. L.ElliottS. N. (1986a). Assessment of students’ acceptability of teacher-initiated interventions for classroom misbehaviors. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 277–283. doi:10.1016/0022-4405(86)90060-9
23.
TurcoT. L.ElliottS. N. (1986b). Students’ acceptability ratings of interventions for classroom misbehaviors: A study of well-behaving and misbehaving youth. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 281–289. doi:10.1177/073428298600400404
24.
TurcoT. L.ElliottS. N. (1990). Acceptability and effectiveness of group contingencies for improving spelling achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 27–37. doi:10.1016/0022-4405(90)90034-5
25.
Von BrockM. B.ElliottS. N. (1987). The influence of treatment effectiveness information on the acceptability of classroom interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 131–144. doi:10.1016/0022-4405(87)90022-7
26.
WittJ. C.ElliottS. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom management strategies. In KratochwillT. R. (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
WittJ. C.ElliottS. N.MartensB. K. (1984). Acceptability of behavioral interventions used in classrooms: The influence of amount of teacher time, severity of behavior problem, and type of intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 9, 95–104. doi:10.1177/019874298400900211
28.
WittJ. C.MartensB. K. (1983). Assessing the acceptability of behavioral interventions used in classrooms. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 510–517. doi:10.1002/1520-6807(198310)20:4<510::AID-PITS2310200420>3.0.CO;2-1
29.
WittJ. C.MartensB. K.ElliottS. N. (1984). Factors affecting teachers’ judgments of the acceptability of behavioral interventions: Time involvement, behavior problem severity, and type of intervention. Behavior Therapy, 15, 204–209. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(84)80022-2
30.
WolfM.W. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–214.
31.
Wollersheim SherveyS.SandilosL. E.DiPernaJ. C.LeiP. W. (2017). Social validity of the Social Skills Improvement System-Classwide Intervention Program (SSIS-CIP) in the primary grades. School Psychology Quarterly, 32, 414–421. doi:10.1037/spq0000203
