Universal screening for emotional and behavioral risk in schools facilitates early identification and intervention for students as part of multitiered systems of support. Early identification has the potential to mitigate adverse outcomes of emotional and behavioral disorders. The purpose of this study was to extend existing research on the technical adequacy and usability of two universal screening measures, the Student Internalizing Behavior Screener (SIBS) and the Student Externalizing Behavior Screener (SEBS). Findings provided evidence for the reliability, concurrent validity, short-term predictive validity, and usability of the SIBS and SEBS in a sample of 154 elementary school students and their teachers. As a secondary focus, the technical adequacy and usability of the SIBS and SEBS was compared with that of two well-researched universal behavioral screening measures (Behavioral and Emotional Screening System and Social Skills Improvement System–Performance Screening Guide). Results indicated that the SIBS and SEBS as a combined measure performed similar to the criterion screening measures.
AchenbachT.RescorlaL. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.
2.
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
3.
ChafouleasS.MillerF.BrieschA.NeugebauerS.Riley-TillmanC. (2012). Usage Rating Profile–Assessment. Storrs: University of Connecticut.
4.
ChinJ.DowdyE.QuirkM. (2013). Universal screening in middle school: Examining the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 53–60.
5.
CohenJ. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
6.
CookC.RasetshwaneK.TruelsonE.GrantS.DartE.CollinsT.SpragueJ. (2011). Development and validation of the Student Internalizing Behavior Screener: Examination of reliability, validity, and classification accuracy. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36, 71–79.
7.
CookC.VolpeR.GreshamF. M. (2012). Technical adequacy, classification accuracy, and social validity of the Student Externalizing Behavior Screener. Unpublished manuscript.
8.
CostelloJ.MustilloS.ErkanliA.KeelerG.AngoldA. (2003). Prevalence and development of psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 837–844.
9.
DrummondK. (1994). The Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS). Grants Pass, OR: Josephine County Mental Health Program.
10.
EklundK.RenshawT. L.DowdyE.JimersonS. R.HartS. R.JonesC. N.EarhartJ. (2009). Early identification of behavioral and emotional problems in youth: Universal screening versus teacher-referral identification. California School Psychologist, 14, 89–95.
11.
ElliottS. N.GreshamF. M. (2007). Social Skills Improvement System–Performance Screening Guide. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.
12.
GreshamF. M. (2005). Response to intervention: An alternative means of identifying students as emotionally disturbed. Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 328–344.
13.
GreshamF. M. (2015). Disruptive behavior disorders: Evidence-based practice for assessment and intervention. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (2008). Social Skills Improvement System: Rating scales. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.
15.
HoagwoodK.ErwinH. (1997). Effectiveness of school-based mental health services for children: A 10-year research review. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 64, 435–451.
16.
HornerR.SugaiG.ToddA.Lewis-PalmerT. (2005). School-wide positive behavior support. In BambaraL.KernL. (Eds.), Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive behavior plans (pp. 359–390). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
KamphausR.ReynoldsC.DeverB. (2014). Behavioral and mental health screening. In KettlerR.GloverT.AlbersC.Feeney-KettlerK. (Eds.), Universal screening in educational settings: Evidence-based decision making for schools (pp. 249–273). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19.
KettlerR. J.ElliottS. N.DaviesM.GriffinP. (2012). Testing a multi-stage screening system: Predicting performance on Australia’s national achievement test using teachers’ ratings of academic and social behaviors. School Psychology International, 33, 93–111. doi: 10.1177/0143034311403036
20.
KingK.ReschlyA. (2014). A comparison of screening instruments: Predictive validity of the BESS and BSC. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32, 687–698.
21.
KingK.ReschlyA.AppletonJ. (2012). An examination of the validity of the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System in a rural elementary school: Validity of the BESS. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 527–538.
22.
LaneK.OakesW.MenziesH.GermerK. (2014). Screening and identification approaches for detecting students at risk. In WalkerH.GreshamF. M. (Eds.), Handbook of evidence-based practices for emotional and behavioral disorders: Applications in schools (pp. 129–151). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
MillerF. G.ChafouleasS. M.Riley-TillmanT. C.FabianoG. A. (2014). Teacher perceptions of the usability of school-based behavior assessments. Behavioral Disorders, 39, 201–210.
24.
National Association of School Psychologists. (2002). Position statement on students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Bethesda, MD: Author.
25.
RenshawT. L.EklundK.DowdyE.JimersonS. R.HartS. R.EarhartJ.JrJonesC. N. (2009). Examining the relationship between scores on the behavioral and emotional screening system and student academic, behavioral, and engagement outcomes: An investigation of concurrent validity in elementary school. The California School Psychologist, 14, 81–88.
26.
ReynoldsC.LivingstonR. (2014). A psychometric primer for school psychologists. In HarrisonP.ThomasA. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Foundations (pp. 281–300). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
27.
SeeleyJ.SeversonH.FixenA. (2014). Empirically based targeted prevention for addressing externalizing and internalizing behavior disorders within school contexts. In WalkerH.GreshamF. M. (Eds.), Handbook of evidence-based practices for emotional and behavioral disorders: Applications in schools (pp. 307–323). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
ShapiroE. S.KellerM. A.LutzJ. G.SantoroL. E.HintzeJ. M. (2006). Curriculum-based measures and performance on state assessment and standardized tests reading and math performance in Pennsylvania. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 19–35. doi: 10.1177/0734282905285237
29.
WalkerH. M.GreshamF. M. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of evidence-based practices for emotional and behavioral disorders: Applications in schools. New York: Guilford.
WalkerH.SeversonH.SeeleyJ. (2010). Universal school-based screening for the early identification of behavioral problems contributing to later destructive outcomes. In ShinnM.WalkerH. (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior problems in a three-tier model including RTI (pp. 677–702). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
