This study reviewed prominent journals within the field of emotional and behavioral disorders to identify direct observation approaches, reported reliability tatistics, and key features of direct observation. Selected journals were systematically reviewed for the past 10 years identifying and quantifying specific direct observation systems and approaches. Suggestions for the field of special education are listed based off identified trends that existed within the past decade of literature. Implications and recommendations for research and practice are described.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertoP. A., & TroutmanA. C. (2013). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (9th ed.). NJ: Merrill.
2.
BerkR. A. (1979). Generalizability of behavioral observations: A clarification of interobserver agreement and interobserver reliability.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 83, 460–472.
3.
CartaJ. J., GreenwoodR., SchulteD., Arreaga-Mayer, & TerryB. (1988). Code for Instructional Structure and Student Academic Response: Mainstream version (MS-CISSAR).Kansas City, KS: University of Kansas, Bureau of Child Research, Juniper Gardens Children's Project.
4.
CohenJ. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
5.
DenoS. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement.The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 184–192.
6.
DrummondT. (1994). The Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS).Grants Pass, OR: Josephine County Mental Health Program.
7.
DuchesneS., VitaroF., LaroseS., & TremblayR. E. (2008). Trajectories of anxiety during elementary years and the prediction of high school noncompletion.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(9), 1134–1146.
8.
ElliottS. N., & GreshamF. M. (2007). Classwide intervention program teacher's guide: Social Skills Improvement System.Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson.
9.
GageN. A., & LewisT. J. (2014). Hierarchical linear modeling meta-analysis of single-subject design research.The Journal of Special Education, 48(1), 3–16.
10.
HawkinsS. M., & HeflinL. J. (2011). Increasing secondary teachers' behavior-specific praise using a video self-modeling and visual performance feedback intervention.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13(2), 97–108.
11.
HaydonT., ConroyM. A., ScottT. M., SindelarP. T., BarberB. R., & OrlandoA. M. (2010). A comparison of three types of opportunities to respond on student academic and social behaviors.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18(1), 27–40.
12.
HintzeJ. M. (2005). Psychometrics of direct observation.School Psychology Review, 34(4).
13.
HollenbeckA. R. (1978). Problems of reliability in observational research. In SackettG. P. (Ed.), Observing behavior, volume 2: Data collection and analysis methods (pp. 79–98). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
14.
HopsH., DavisB., & LongoriaN. (1995). Methodological issues in direct observation: Illustrations with the Living in Familial Environments (LIFE) coding system.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 24(2), 193–203.
15.
KamphausR. W., & ReynoldsC. R. (2007). BASC-2 Behavior and Emotional Screening System (BASC-2 BESS).San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
16.
KauffmanJ. M., & LandrumT. J. (2013). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
17.
KazdinA. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (rev. ed.).New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
LingoA. S., JolivetteK., & Barton-ArwoodS. M. (2009). Visual and oral feedback to promote appropriate social behavior for a student with emotional and behavioral disorders.Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(1), 24–29.
19.
MerrellK. W., & WalkerH. M. (2004). Deconstructing a definition: Social maladjustment versus emotional disturbance and moving the EBD field forward.Psychology in the Schools, 41(8), 899–910.
20.
NoellG. H., BrownellM. T., BuzickH. M., & JonesN. D. (2014). Using educator effectiveness measures to improve educator preparation programs and student outcomes (Document No. LS-1). Retrieved from University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center, http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/literature-syntheses/
21.
SackettG. P. (1978). Observing behavior, volume 2: Data collection and analysis methods.Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
22.
ScottT. M., AlterP. J., & HirnR. G. (2011). An examination of typical classroom context and instruction for students with and without behavioral disorders.Education and Treatment of Children, 34(4), 619–641.
23.
ShapiroE. S. (2004). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
24.
ShapiroE. S. (2011). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention.Guilford Press.
25.
ShoresR. E., & WehbyJ. H. (1999). Analyzing the classroom social behavior of students with EBD.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 7(4), 194–199.
26.
StormontM., & ReinkeW. (2009). The importance of precorrective statements and behavior-specific praise and strategies to increase their use.Beyond Behavior, 18(3), 26–32.
27.
SuenH. K., & LeeP. S. (1985). Effects of the use of percentage agreement on behavioral observation reliabilities: A reassessment.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 7(3), 221–234.
28.
SutherlandK. S., AlderN., & GunterP. L. (2003). The effect of varying rates of opportunities to respond to academic requests on the classroom behavior of students with EBD.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11(4), 239–248.
29.
SutherlandK. S., WehbyJ. H., & CopelandS. R. (2000). Effect of varying rates of behavior-specific praise on the on-task behavior of students with EBD.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8(1), 2–8.
30.
SutherlandK. S., WehbyJ. H., & YoderP. J. (2002). Examination of the relationship between teacher praise and opportunities for students with EBD to respond to academic requests.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10(1), 5–13.
31.
TappJ., WehbyJ. H., & EllisD. (1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 25–31.
32.
WalkerH. M., RamseyE., & GreshamF. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence-based practices.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
33.
WalkerH. M., & SeversonH. (1992). Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders: Technical manual.Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
34.
WatkinsM. W., & PachecoM. (2000). Interobserver agreement in behavioral research: Importance and calculation.Journal of Behavioral Education, 10(4), 205–212.
35.
WehbyJ. H., LaneK. L., & FalkK. B. (2003). Academic instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11(4), 194–197.
