AdamsonR. M., & WachsmithS. T. (2014). A review of direct observation research within the past decade in the field of emotional and behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 39, 181–189.
2.
American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3.
BaerD. M., HarrisonR., FradenburgL., PetersenD., & MillaS. (2005). Some pragmatics in the valid and reliable recording of directly observed behavior.Research on Social Work Practice, 15(6), 440–451.
4.
BaerD. M., WolfM. M., & RisleyT. R. (1987). Some still-current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 313–327.
5.
ChafouleasS. M., McDougalJ. L., Riley-TillmanT. C., PanahonC. J., & HiltA. M. (2005). What do daily behavior report cards (DBRCs) measure? An initial comparison of DBRCs with direct observation for off-task behavior.Psychology in the Schools, 42, 6, 669–676. doi:10.1002/pits.20102
6.
CooperJ. O., HeronT. E., & HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
7.
CreswellJ. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
8.
CronbachL. J. (1988). Five perspectives on validation argument. In WainerH., & BraunH. (Eds.), Test Validity (pp. 3–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
CronbachL. J., & MeehlP. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.
10.
GageN. A., PrykanowskiD., & HirnR. G. (2014). Increasing reliability of direct observation measurement approaches in emotional and/or behavioral disorders research using generalizability theory.Behavioral Disorders, 39, 228–244.
11.
GerstenR., BakerS. K., HaagerD., & GravesA. W. (2005). Exploring the role of teacher quality in predicting reading outcomes for first-grade English learners: An observational study.Remedial and Special Education, 26, 197–206.
12.
HintzeJ. M. (2005). Psychometrics of direct observation.School Psychology Review, 34, 507–519.
13.
HornerR. H., CarrE. G., HalleJ., McGeeG., OdomS., & WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education.Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
14.
HorovitzM., & MatsonJ. L. (2012). In vivo assessment: Issues of real-time data. In MatsonJ. L. (Ed.), Functional assessment for challenging behaviors (pp. 143–158). New York: Springer.
15.
KazdinA. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
KratochwillT. R., HitchcockJ., HornerR. H., LevinJ. R., OdomS. L., RindskopfD. M., & ShadishW. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/reference_resources/wwc_scd.pdf
17.
LewisT. J., ScottT. M., WehbyJ. H., & WillsH. P. (2014). Direct observation of teacher and student behavior in school settings: Trends, issues and future directions.Behavioral Disorders, 39, 190–200.
18.
McComasJ. J., VollmerT. R., & KennedyC. (2009). Descriptive analysis: Quantification and examination of behavior-environment interactions.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 411–412. doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-411
19.
MessickS. (1988). The once and future issues of validity: Assessing the meaning and consequences of measurement. In WainerH., & BraunH. I. (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 49–60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20.
MillerF. G., ChafouleasS. M., Riley-TillmanT. C., & FabianoG. A. (2014). Teacher perceptions of the usability of school-based behavior assessments.Behavioral Disorders, 39, 201–210.
21.
PustejovskyJ. E., & RunyonC. (2014). Alternating renewal models for behavioral observation: Simulation methods, software, and validity illustrations.Behavioral Disorders, 39, 211–227.
22.
ShadishW. R., CookT. D., & CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
23.
StichterJ. P., & Riley-TillmanT. C. (2014). Considering systematic direct observation after a century of research—Commentary on the special issue.Behavioral Disorders, 39, 245–247.
24.
WirthO., SlavenJ., & TaylorM. A. (2014). Interval sampling methods and measurement error: A computer simulation.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 83–100. doi:10.1002/jaba.93