Three adolescents (ages 14–17) with emotional and behavioral disorders displayed chronic disruptive behavior in their self-contained classrooms at a self-contained alternative school. A descriptive functional behavioral assessment was conducted for each student. Data from file review, structured interviews, and direct observations were used to identify the functions of their disruptive behaviors. Then, function-based interventions were systematically constructed for each student and implemented for an extended period (nearly 6 weeks) within the most problematic situation in their classrooms. The interventions improved each student's behavior and the effects maintained during follow-up and generalized to instruction in a nonintervention classroom. Social validity data comparing the interventions to baseline practices revealed the function-based intervention had moderately higher social validity among teachers and substantially higher social validity among students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerganJ. R., & KratochwillT. R. (1990). Behavioral consultation and therapy.Columbus, OH: Merrill.
2.
BijouS. W., PetersonR. F., & AultM. H. (1968). A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 175–191.
3.
CoxS. (1999). An assessment of an alternative education program for at-risk delinquent youth, Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 36, 323–330.
4.
DunlapG., Kern-DunlapL., dePerczelM., ClarkeS., WilsonD., ChildsK. E., & FalkG. (1993). Preliminary functional assessment survey. Unpublished document, Division of Applied Research and Educational Services, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
5.
FoxJ. J., & GableR. A. (2004). Functional behavioral assessment. In RutherfordR. B., QuinnM. M., & MathurS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 143–162). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
FoxJ. J., ConroyM., & HeckamanK. (1998). Research issues in functional assessment of the challenging behaviors of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 26–33.
7.
FranklinC. (1992). Alternative school programs for at-risk youths. Social Work in Education, 14(4), 239–251.
HeckamanK., ConroyM., FoxJ. J., & ChaitA. (2000). Functional assessment-based intervention research on students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 196–210.
10.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1401–1485.
11.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1415 (k) (d) (ii).
12.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single-case research designs.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
KernL., HiltA. M., & GreshamF. (2004). An evaluation of the functional behavioral assessment process used with students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 440–452.
15.
KingeryP. M. (2000). Suspension and expulsion: New directions. US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Bulletin. Retrieved from www.ncjrs.gov
16.
KingeryP. M. (2001). Zero tolerance: The alternative is education. US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Bulletin. Retrieved from www.ncjrs.gov
17.
KleinerB., PorchR. M., & FarrisE. (2002). Public alternative schools and programs for students at risk of education failure: 2000-01 (NCES 2002–04). U.S. Department of Education. Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
18.
LaneK. L., KarlbergJ. R., & ShpecaroJ. C. (2009). An examination of the evidence base for function-based interventions for students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders attending middle and high schools. Exceptional Children, 75, 321–340.
19.
LaneK. L., RogersL. A., ParksR. J., WeisenbachJ. L., MauA. C., MerwinM. T., & BergmanW. A. (2007). Function-based interventions for students’ nonresponsive to primary and secondary prevention efforts: Illustrations at the elementary and middle school levels. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 169–183.
20.
LaneK. L., WeisenbachJ. L., LittleM. A., PhillipsA., & WehbyJ. (2006). Illustrations of function-based interventions implemented by general education teachers: Building capacity at the school site. Education and Treatment of Children, 29, 549–571.
21.
LaneK. L., WeisenbachJ. L., PhillipsA., & WehbyJ. (2007). Designing, implementing, and evaluating function-based interventions using a systematic, feasible approach. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 122–139.
22.
LehrC., MoreauR. A., LangeC. M., & LannersE. (2004). Alternative schools: Findings from a national survey of states (Research report 2. Alternative Schools Research Project). Institute of Community Integration, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
23.
LiaupsinC. J., UmbreitJ., FerroJ., UrsoA., & UpretiG. (2006). Improving academic engagement through systematic, function-based intervention. Education and Treatment of Children, 29, 573–591.
24.
MartensB. K., WittJ. C., ElliotS. N., & DarveauxD. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 191–198.
25.
NahgahgwonK. N., UmbreitJ., LiaupsinC. J., & TurtonA. M. (in press). Function-based planning for young children at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children.
26.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2002). Public alternative schools and programs for students at risk of education failure: 2000–01. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002004.pdf
27.
PetersenP., & EllisonD. (2005, November). The relationship between “Support Provider Buy-In” and intervention success. Paper presented at the 2005 Annual Conference of the Ontario Association of Behaviour Analysts (ONTABA), Toronto, ON.
28.
RaywidM. (1999). History and issues of alternative schools. Education Digest, 64, 49–51.
29.
SassoG. M., ConroyM. A., StitchnerJ. P., & FoxJ. J. (2001). Slowing down the bandwagon: The misapplication of functional assessment for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 281–296.
30.
ScottT. M., McIntyreJ., LiaupsinC., NelsonC. M., ConroyM., & PayneL. D. (2005). An examination of the relation between functional behavior assessment and selected intervention strategies with school-based teams. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7, 205–215.
31.
SkibaR., & PetersonR. (1999). The dark side of zero tolerance: Can punishment lead to safe schools?Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 372–382.
32.
StahrB., CushingD., LaneK. L., & FoxJ. (2006). Efficacy of a function-based intervention to decrease off-task behavior exhibited by a student with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 201–211.
33.
SugaiG., HornerR. H., DunlapG., HienemanM., LewisT. J., NelsonC. M., & RuefM. (2000). Applying positive behavior support and functional behavior assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 131–143.
34.
TobinT., & SpragueJ. (2000). Alternative education strategies. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 177–186.
35.
TurtonA., UmbreitJ., LiaupsinC., & BartleyJ. (2007). Function-based intervention for an adolescent with emotional and behavioral disorders in Bermuda: Moving across culture. Behavioral Disorders, 33, 23–32.
36.
UmbreitJ., FerroJ., LiaupsinC., & LaneK. L. (2007). Functional behavioral assessment and function-based intervention: An effective, practical approach.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
37.
UmbreitJ., LaneK. L., & DejudC. (2004). Improving classroom behavior by modifying task difficulty: The effects of increasing the difficulty of too-easy tasks. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 13–20.
38.
UnderwoodM. A., UmbreitJ., & LiaupsinC. J. (2009). Efficacy of a systematic process for designing function-based interventions for adults in a community setting. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 25–38.
39.
U.S. Department of Education National Center for Statistics. (2006). Dropout rates in the United States: 2004. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/2007024.pdf
40.
WittJ. C., & ElliottS. N. (1985). Acceptable of classroom intervention strategies. In KratchowillT. R. (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (vol. 4, pp. 251–288). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41.
WoodB. K., UmbreitJ., LiaupsinC. J., & GreshamF. (2007). A treatment integrity analysis of function-based intervention. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 105–120.
