Self-Regulated Strategies Development for Persuasive Writing in Tandem with Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Support: Effects for Second-Grade Students with Behavioral and Writing Difficulties
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2010
Self-Regulated Strategies Development for Persuasive Writing in Tandem with Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Support: Effects for Second-Grade Students with Behavioral and Writing Difficulties
The present study replicates and extends previous research regarding the effects of self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) within a schoolwide positive behavior support model among students with writing difficulties who also had either internalizing or externalizing behavior patterns. Two multiple-probe designs, involving 13 second-grade students, are reported. Students with internalizing behaviors (5 girls, 1 boy) and those with externalizing behaviors (1 girl and 6 boys) learned how to plan and write persuasive essays using the SRSD model of instruction. Lasting increases in persuasive essay elements as well as improvements in length and quality of writing were found across both groups of students. Both rating scales and interviews indicated high social validity among classroom teachers and students. Limitations and directions for future research are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdkinsM. H. (2005). Self-regulated strategy development and generalization instruction: Effects on story writing among second and third grade students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
2.
AndersonJ. A., KutashK., & DuchnowskiA. J. (2001). A comparison of the academic progress of students with EBD and students with LD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9, 106–115.
3.
Bangert-DownsR. L., HurleyM. M., & WilkinsonB. (2004). The effects of school-based Writing-to-Learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29–58.
4.
CutlerL., & GrahamS. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 907–919.
5.
DrummondT. (1994). The Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS).Grants Pass, OR: Josephine County Mental Health Program.
6.
DrummondT., EddyJ. M., & ReidJ. B. (1998a). Follow-up study #3; Risk Screening Scale: Prediction of negative outcomes by 10th grade from 2nd grade screening.Unpublished technical report. Eugene, OR: Oregon Social Learning Center.
7.
DrummondT., EddyJ. M., & ReidJ. B. (1998b). Follow-up study #4; Risk Screening Scale: Prediction of negative outcomes in two longitudinal samples.Unpublished technical report. Eugene, OR: Oregon Social Learning Center.
8.
DrummondT., EddyJ. M., ReidJ. B., & BankL. (1994, November). The Student Risk Screening Scale: A brief teacher screening instrument for conduct disorder. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Prevention Conference, Washington, DC.
9.
GlombN., & WestR. (1990). Teaching behavior-ally disordered adolescents to use self-management skills for improving the completeness, accuracy, and neatness of creative writing homework assignments. Behavioral Disorders, 15, 233–242.
10.
GomezC. R., BairdS., & JungL. A. (2004). Regulatory disorder identification, diagnosis, and intervention planning: Untapped resources for facilitating development. Infants and Young Children, 17, 327–340.
11.
GrahamS. (1999). Handwriting and spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities: A review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 78–98.
12.
GrahamS. (2005). Writing interventions and strategies. In LeeS. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of school psychology (pp. 587–590). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
GrahamS. (2006a). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. In MacArthurC., GrahamS., & FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 187–207). New York: Guilford.
14.
GrahamS. (2006b). Writing. In AlexanderP., & WinneP. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 457–478). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
GrahamS., & HarrisK. R. (1989). A components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students’ compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 353–361.
16.
GrahamS., & HarrisK. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In SwansonL., HarrisK. R., & GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 383–402). New York: Guilford.
17.
GrahamS., HarrisK. R., & MasonL. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated writing development. Contemporary Educational Psychology,’ 30, 207–241.
18.
GrahamS., & PerrinD. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high school (commissioned by the Carnegie Corp. of NY). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence in Education.
19.
GreshamF. M., & ElliottS. N. (1990). Social Skills Rating System.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
20.
GreshamF. M., & KernL (2004). Internalizing behavior problems in children and adolescents. In RutherfordR. B., QuinnM. M., & MathurS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 262–281). New York: Guilford Press.
21.
GreshamF. M., LaneK. L., MacMillanD. L., & BocianK. M. (1999). Social and academic profiles of externalizing and internalizing groups: Risk factors for emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 231–246.
22.
HammilD., & LarsenS. (1996). Test of Written Language-3.Austin, TX: Pro-ED.
23.
HarrisK., & GrahamS. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
24.
HarrisK. R., & GrahamS. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 251–262.
25.
HarrisK. R., GrahamS., BrindleM., & SandmelK. (2009). Metacognition and children's writing. In HackerD., DunloskyJ., & GraesserA. (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 131–153). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
HarrisK. R., GrahamS., & MasonL. (2006). Improving the writing, knowledge, and motivation of struggling young writers: Effects of self-regulated strategy development with and without peer support. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 295–340.
27.
HarrisK. R., GrahamS., MasonL., & FriedlanderB. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students.Baltimore, MA: Brookes.
28.
HornerR. H., & SugaiG. (2000). School-wide behavior support: An emerging initiative. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 231–232.
29.
KavaleK. A., MathurS. R., FornessS. R., RutherfordR. B., & QuinnM. M. (1997). Effectiveness of social skills training for students with behavior disorders: A meta-analysis. In ScruggsT. E., & MastropieriM. A. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 11, pp. 1–26). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
30.
KennedyC. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
KerrM. M., & NelsonC. M. (2002). Strategies for addressing behavior problems in the classroom (4th ed.).Upper Saddle Creek, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
32.
LaneK. L. (1999). Young students at risk for antisocial behavior: The utility of academic and social skills interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 7, 211–223.
33.
LaneK. L. (2004). Academic instruction and tutoring interventions for students with emotional/behavioral disorders: 1990 to present, In RutherfordR. B., QuinnM. M., & MathurS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 462–486). New York: Guilford Press.
34.
LaneK. L., GrahamS., HarrisK. R., LittleM. A., SandmelK., & BrindleM. (in press). Story writing: The effects of self-regulated strategy development for second grade students with writing and behavioral difficulties. Journal of Special Education.
35.
LaneK. L., HarrisK., GrahamS., WeisenbachJ., BrindleM., & MorphyP. (2008). The effects of self-regulated strategy development on the writing performance of second grade students with behavioral and writing difficulties. Journal of Special Education, 41, 234–253.
36.
LaneK. L., KalbergJ. R., BruhnA. L., MahoneyM. E., & DriscollS. A. (2008). Primary prevention programs at the elementary level: Issues of treatment integrity, systematic screening, and reinforcement. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 465–494.
37.
LaneK. L., LittleM. A., CaseyA. M., LambertW., WehbyJ. H., WeisenbachJ. L. (2009). A comparison of systematic screening tools for emotional and behavioral disorders: How do they compare?Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 17, 93–105.
38.
LaneK. L., KalbergJ. R., & MenziesH. M. (2009). Developing schoolwide programs to prevent and manage problem behaviors.New York: The Guilford Press.
39.
LangoneJ., LevineB., CleesT. J., MaloneM., & KoorlandM. (1996). The differential effects of a typing tutor and microcomputer-based word processing on the writing samples of elementary students with behavior disorders. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29, 141–158.
40.
LewisT. J., & SugaiG. (1999). Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive school wide management. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31, 1–24.
41.
LienemannT., GrahamS., Leader-JanssenB., & ReidR. (2006). Improving the writing performance of struggling writers in second grade. Journal of Special Education, 40, 66–78.
42.
MartensB. K., WittJ. C., ElliottS. N., & DarveauxD. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school based interventions. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 16, 191–198.
43.
MasonL. H., & ShrinerJ. G. (2008). Self-regulated strategy development instruction for writing an opinion essay: Effects for six students with emotional/behavior disorders. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 71–94.
44.
MasonL. H., SnyderK. H., SukhramD. P., & KedemY. (2006). TWA+PLANS strategies for expository reading and writing: Effects for nine fourth-grade students. Exceptional Children, 73, 69–89.
45.
McLaughlinT. (1983). A comparison of individual and group contingencies on spelling performance with special education students. Child Family & Therapy, 4, 1–10.
NelsonR., BennerG., LaneK., & SmithB. (2004). Academic achievement of K-12 students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 71, 7159–7173.
49.
RumseyI., & BallardK. D. (1985). Teaching self-management strategies for independent story writing to children with classroom behavioral difficulties. Educational Psychology, 5, 147–157.
50.
SattlerJ. (1991). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Sattler.
51.
ScardamaliaM., BereiterC., & GolemanH. (1982). The role of production factors in writing ability. In NystrandM. (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process and structure of written discourse (pp. 173–210). New York: Academic Press.
52.
SchlossP. J., HarrimanN. E., & PfefierK. (1985). Application of a sequential prompt reduction technique to the independent composition performance of behaviorally disordered youth. Behavioral Disorders, 11, 17–23.
53.
SugaiG., HornerR. H., DunlapG., LewisT. J., NelsonC. M., ScottT. (2000). Applying positive behavior support and functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 131–143.
54.
TindalG., & CrawfordL. (2002). Teaching writing to students with behavior disorders: Metaphor and medium. In LaneK. L., GreshamF. M., & O'ShaughnessyT. E. (Eds.), Interventions for children with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 104–124). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
55.
TroutA. L., NordnessP. D., PierceC. D., & EpsteinM. H. (2003). Research on the academic status of children with emotional and behavioral disorders: A review of the literature from 1961 to 2000. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 198–210.
56.
WalkerH. M., Block-PedegoA., TodisB., & SeversonH. (1991). School archival records search.Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
57.
WalkerH. M., RamseyE., & GreshamF. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence-based practices (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wads-worth.
58.
WalkerH. M., & SeversonH. (1992). Systematic screening for behavior disorders: Technical manual.Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
WittJ. C., & ElliottS. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In KratochwillT. R. (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4., pp. 251–288). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
