A multiple-baseline design study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of strategy instruction in persuasive writing with eighth-grade students who attended a public day school for students with severe emotional and behavior disabilities. Students were taught to plan and write persuasive essays using the Self-Regulated Strategy Development model. Following mastery of the strategy, students were taught to apply the learned strategy to write fluently in 10 min. After more than 4 months of instruction, findings indicated that all students had mastered the components of effective persuasive essay writing and increased from baseline to postinstruction and fluency phases in length and quality of essays. Effects were also noted on maintenance and generalization essay probes administered over 11.5 weeks after fluency testing. Observed on-task behavior was significantly correlated with a number of fluency, maintenance, and generalization outcomes. Implications for teaching and further research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdkinsM. H. (2005). Self-regulated strategy development and generalization instruction: Effects of story writing among second and third grade students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Dissertation Abstracts International. (UMI 3202407)
2.
AlbertoP. A., & TroutmanA. C. (2008). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
GrahamS., & PerrinD. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students.Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445–476.
4.
HammillD., & LarsenS. (1996). Test of written language–3.Austin, TX: Pro-ED.
5.
HarrisK. R., GrahamS., BrindleM., & SandmelK. (in press). Metacognition and children's writing. In HackerD. J., DunloskyJ., & GraesserA. C. (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
HarrisK. R., GrahamS., MasonL. H., & FriedlanderB. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students.Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
7.
HawkinsR. O., & AxelrodM. I. (2008). Increasing the on-task homework behavior of youth with behavior disorders using functional behavioral assessment.Behavior Modification, 32, 840–859.
8.
KauffmanJ. M., & LandrumT. J. (2008). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
KazdinA. E. (1984). Statistical analysis for single-case experimental designs. In BarlowD. H., & HersenM. (Eds.), Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. (2nd ed., pp. 285–324). New York: Pergamon Press.
10.
KennedyC. H. (2005). Single-case designs for education research.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
LaneK. L. (2004). Academic instruction and tutoring interventions for students with emotional/behavioral disorders: 1990 to present. In RutherfordR. B., QuinnM. M., & MathurS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 462–486). New York: Guilford Press.
12.
LaneK. L., Barton-ArwoodS. M., NelsonJ. R., & WehbyJ. (2008). Academic performance of students with emotional and behavioral disorders served in a self-contained setting.Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 43–62.
13.
LaneK. L., HarrisK. R., GrahamS., WeisenbachJ. L., BrindleM., & MorphyP. (2008). The effects of self-regulated strategy development on the writing performance of second-grade students with behavioral and writing difficulties.Journal of Special Education, 41, 234–253.
14.
LewisT. J., Lewis-PalmerT., NewcomerL., & StichterJ. (2004). Applied behavior analysis and the education and treatment of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. In RutherfordR. B., QuinnM. M., & MathurS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 523–545). New York: Guilford Press.
15.
MasonL. H. (2009). Developing quick writing skills of middle school students with disabilities: Results of two studies. Unpublished manuscript, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
16.
MasonL. H., HarrisK. R., & GrahamS. (2002). Every child has a story to tell: Self-regulated strategy development for story writing.Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 496–506.
17.
MasonL. H., KubinaR. M., ValasaL., & MongerA. C. (2009). Year 2: Persuasive quick writing. Unpublished manuscript, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
18.
MasonL. H., & ShrinerJ. (2008). Self-regulated strategy development instruction for six elementary students with emotional behavioral disorders.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 71–93.
19.
MastropieriM. A., BerkeleyS., McDuffieK. A., GraffH., MarshakL., & ConnersN. (2009). What is published in the field of special education? An analysis of 11 prominent journals.Exceptional Children, 76, 95–109.
20.
MastropieriM. A., & ScruggsT. E. (2002). Effective instruction for special education (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
21.
MastropieriM. A., & ScruggsT. E. (2004). Effective classroom instruction. In SpielbergerC. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied psychology (pp. 687–691). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
22.
MastropieriM. A., & ScruggsT. E. (2010). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective differentiated instruction (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
MastropieriM. A., ScruggsT. E., Cuenca-SanchezY., IrbyN., MillsS., & MasonL. (in press). Persuading students with emotional disabilities to write: A design study. In ScruggsT. E., & MastropieriM. A. (Eds.), Literacy and learning: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Vol. 23.Bingley, UK: Emerald.
24.
MillerK. A., GunterP. L., VennM. L., HummelJ., & WileyL. P. (2003). Effects of curricular and materials modifications on academic performance and task engagement of three students with emotional or behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 28, 130–149.
25.
ReganK. S., MastropieriM. A., & ScruggsT. E. (2005). Promoting expressive writing among students with emotional and behavioral disturbance via dialogue journals.Behavioral Disorders, 31, 33–50.
26.
ReganK. S., MastropieriM. A., & ScruggsT. E. (2009). Advances in literacy practices for students with emotional and behavioral disabilities. In ScruggsT. E., & MastropieriM. A. (Eds.), Policy and practice: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities. (vol. 22, pp. 317–339). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
27.
ReynoldsC. R., & KamphausR. W. (2003). Reynolds intellectual assessment scales.Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.
28.
ScruggsT. E., & MastropieriM. A. (1986). Academic characteristics of behaviorally disordered and learning disabled children.Behavioral Disorders, 11, 184–190.
29.
ScruggsT. E., MastropieriM. A., & CastoG. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation.Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33.
30.
ScruggsT. E., MastropieriM. A., & ReganK. (2006). Statistical analysis for single subject research designs. In ScruggsT. E., & MastropieriM. A. (Eds.), Applications of research methodology: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (pp. 33–55). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
31.
SiegelS., & CastellanN. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences.New York: McGraw Hill.
32.
The Psychological Corporation. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence.San Antonio, TX: Author.
33.
TodmanJ. B., & DugardP. (2001). Single-case and small-n experimental designs: A practical guide to randomization tests.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34.
WechslerD. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
35.
WechslerD. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
