The authors examined the academic characteristics of 140 elementary-aged students served under the category of emotional disturbance (ED) from schools that differed in income level, performance on state testing, and suspension rates. School income accounted for a large amount of the variance in the reading and math achievement of students with ED as measured by the Woodcock-Johnson III. However, relative academic performance (as measured by performance on state testing compared with same-school peers and teacher ratings of academic competence) was similar across school income levels. Implications for intervention research and eligibility practices for students with ED are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikenL. S., & WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
AndersonJ. A., KutashK., & DuchnowskiA. J. (2001). A comparison of the academic progress of students with EBD and students with LD.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9, 106–111.
3.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
4.
BrighamF. J., & KauffmanJ. M. (1998). Creating supportive environments for students with emotional or behavioral disorders.Effective School Practices, 17(2), 5–35.
5.
Brooks-CunnJ., & DuncanG. J. (1997). The effects of poverty on children.The Future of Children, 7, 55–71.
6.
BrowneT., StotskyB. A., & EichornJ. (1977). A selective comparison of psychological, developmental, social, and academic factors among emotionally disturbed children in three treatment settings.Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 7, 231–253.
7.
BullisM., & CheneyD. (1999). Vocational and transition interventions for adolescents and young adults with emotional and behavioral disorders.Focus on Exceptional Children, 31(7), 1–24.
8.
ChristieC. A., NelsonC. M., & JolivetteK. (2004). School characteristics related to the use of suspension.Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 509–526.
9.
CohenJ., CohenP., WestS. G., & AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
CostelloE. J., ComptonS. N., KeelerG., & AngoldA. (2003). Relationships between poverty and psychopathology: A natural experiment.Journal of the American Medical Association, 290, 2023–2029.
11.
CostelloE. J., MesserS. C., BirdH. R., CohenP., & ReinherzH. Z. (1998). The prevalence of serious emotional disturbance: A re-analysis of community studies.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 7, 411–432.
12.
CoutinhoM. J., OswaldD. P., BestA. M., & FornessS. R. (2002). Gender and sociodemographic factors and the disproportionate identification of culturally and linguistically diverse students with emotional disturbance.Behavioral Disorders, 27, 109–125.
13.
DuncanB. B., FornessS. R., & HartsoughC. (1995). Students identified as seriously emotionally disturbed in day treatment.Behavioral Disorders, 20, 238–252.
14.
EnsmingerM. E., ForrestC. B., RileyA. W., KangM., GreenB. F., & StarfieldB. (2000). The validity of measures of socio-economic status of adolescents.Journal of Adolescent Research, 15, 392–419.
15.
FornessS. R. (2005). The pursuit of evidence-based practice in special education for children with emotional and behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 30, 311–330.
16.
FornessS. R., & KnitzerJ. A. (1992). A new proposed definition and terminology to replace “serious emotional disturbance” in the Individuals with Disabilities Act.School Psychology Review, 21, 12–20.
GerberM., & SemmelM. (1984). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process.Educational Psychologist, 19, 137–146.
19.
GlassbergL. A. (1994). Students with behavioral disorders: Determinants of placement outcomes.Behavioral Disorders, 19, 181–191.
20.
GreenbaumP. E., DedrickR. F., FriedmanR. M., KutashK., BrownE. C., & LardieriS. P. (1996). National Adolescent and Child Treatment Study (NACTS): Outcomes for children with serious emotional and behavioral disturbance.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 130–146.
21.
GreshamF. M. (2005). Response to intervention: An alternative means of identifying students as emotionally disturbed.Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 328–344.
22.
GreshamF. M., & ElliotS. N. (1990). Social skills rating system.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
23.
GunterP. L., & ReedT. M. (1997). Academic instruction of children with emotional and behavioral disorders.Preventing School Failure, 42, 33–37.
24.
HinkieD. E., WiersmaW., & JursS. G. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin.
25.
HoaglinD. C., & WelshR. E. (1978). The hat matrix in regression and ANOVA.American Statistician, 32, 17–22.
26.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 31 U.S.C.
27.
JolivetteK., WehbyJ. H., & HirschL. (1999). Academic strategy identification for students exhibiting inappropriate classroom behaviors.Behavioral Disorders, 24, 210–221.
28.
KauffmanJ. M. (2005). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice.
29.
KorteringL. J., & BlackorbyJ. (1992). High school dropout and students identified with behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 18, 24–32.
30.
LaneK. L. (2004). Academic instruction and tutoring interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: 1990 to the present. In RutherfordR. B., QuinnM. M., & MathurS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 462–486). New York: Guilford.
31.
LaneK. L., WehbyJ. H., LittleM. A., & CooleyC. (2005). Academic, behavioral, and social profiles of students with emotional and behavioral disorders educated in self-contained classrooms and self-contained schools: Part I—Are they more alike than different?Behavioral Disorders, 30, 349–361.
32.
LeeS. W., ElliotJ., & BarbourJ. D. (1994). A comparison of cross-informant behavior ratings in diagnosis.Behavioral Disorders, 19, 87–97.
33.
LipseyM. W., & WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
MacMillanD. L., & SipersteinG. N. (2002). Learning disabilities as operationalized by the schools. In BradleyR., DanielsonL., & HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 287–333). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35.
MattisonR. E., HooperS. R., & GlassbergL. A. (2002). Three-year course of learning disorders in children classified as behaviorally disordered.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 1454–1461.
36.
McLoydV. C. (1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development.American Psychologist, 53, 185–204.
37.
MeadowsN. B., NeelR. S., ScottC. M., & ParkerG. (1994). Academic performance, social competence, and mainstream and nonmainstream students with behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 19, 170–180.
38.
MooneyP., DennyR. K., & GunterP. L. (2004). The impact of NCLB and the reauthorization of IDEA on academic instruction of students with emotional or behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 29, 237–246.
39.
MooneyP., EpsteinM. H., ReidR., & NelsonJ. R. (2003). Status and trends in academic intervention research for students with emotional disturbance.Remedial and Special Education, 24, 273–287.
40.
NelsonJ. R., BennerG. J., LaneK., & SmithB. W. (2004). Academic achievement of K-12 students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Exceptional Children, 71, 59–63.
41.
NelsonJ. R., JohnsonA., & Marchand-MartellaN. (1996). Effects of direct instruction, cooperative learning, and independent learning practices on the classroom behavior of students with behavioral disorders: A comparative analysis.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 53–63.
42.
NeterJ., WassermanW., & KutnerM. H. (1989). Applied linear regression models (2nd ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
43.
OdomS. L., BrantlingerE., GerstenR., HornerR. H., ThompsonB., & HarrisK. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices.Exceptional Children, 71, 137–148.
44.
OswaldD. P., CoutinhoM. J., BestA. M., & SinghN. N. (1999). Ethnic representation in special education: The influence of school-related economic and demographic variables.Journal of Special Education, 32, 194–206.
45.
PedhazurE. J. (1999). Multiple regression in behavioral research (3rd ed.). Orlando, FL: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.
46.
PetersonK. M. H., & ShinnM. R. (2002). Severe discrepancy models: Which explains school identification practices for learning disabilities?School Psychology Review, 31, 459–476.
47.
ReidR., GonzalezJ. E., NordnessP. D., TroutA., & EpsteinM. H. (2004). A meta-analysis of the academic status of students with emotional/ behavioral disturbance.Journal of Special Education, 38, 130–143.
48.
RosenblattJ. A., & RosenblattA. (1999). Youth functional status and academic achievement in collaborative mental health and education programs: Two California care systems.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 7, 21–30.
49.
RuhlK. L., & BerlinghoffD. H. (1992). Research on improving behaviorally disordered students’ academic performance: A review of the literature.Behavioral Disorders, 17, 178–190.
50.
SabornieE. J., CullinanD., OsborneS. S., & BrockL. B. (2005). Intellectual, academic, and behavioral functioning of students with high-incidence disabilities: A cross-categorical meta-analysis.Exceptional Children, 72, 47–63.
51.
SirinS. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research.Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453.
52.
SutherlandK. S., Lewis-PalmerT., StichterJ., & MorganP. L. (2008). Examining the influence of teacher behavior and classroom context on the academic and behavioral outcomes for students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Journal of Special Education, 41, 223–233.
53.
TroutA. L., NordnessP. D., PierceC. D., & EpsteinM. H. (2003). Research on the academic status of children with emotional and behavioral disorders: A review of the literature from 1961 to 2000.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 198–210.
54.
U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Twenty-ninth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act.Washington, DC: Author.
55.
WagnerM. M. (1995). Outcomes for youth with serious emotional disturbance in secondary school and early adulthood.The Future of Children, 5(2), 90–111.
56.
WagnerM., KutashK., DuchnowskiA. J., EpsteinM. H., & SumiW. C. (2005). The children and youth we serve: A national picture of the characteristics of students with emotional disturbances receiving special education.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 79–96.
57.
WalkerH. M., RamseyE., & GreshamF. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Strategies and best practices (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.
58.
WhiteK. R. (1982). The relationship between socioeconomic status and academic achievement.Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481.
59.
WoodcockR. W., McGrewK. S., & MatherN. (2001). Woodcock Johnson III tests of achievement.Itasca, IL: Riverside.
