The present study examined the relation between teacher ratings of student social functioning and academic performance and teacher-student relationship quality. Data were collected from 230 students and 20 teachers in two high-poverty, low-performing schools in a large urban school district in the Midwest. Students were 93% African American. Teachers were 47.4% African American. Results indicated that the level of externalizing and prosocial behaviors demonstrated by students in kindergarten through third grade significantly influenced the student-teacher relationship quality as measured by the Student-Teacher Relationship Survey-short form. Teacher perceptions of students’ externalizing and prosocial behaviors were influenced, in part, by teacher race. Teacher-student relationship quality had a clinically significant effect on teacher academic ratings of children. Although not conclusive, results seem to indicate a link between externalizing behavior problems and poor student-teacher relationship ratings. Poor student-teacher relationship quality, in turn, is associated with lower academic ratings. Further investigation using larger sample sizes that allow more sophisticated analyses are needed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchenbachT. M. (1991). Manual for the Teacher Report Form and profile.Burlington, VT: University of Vermont.
2.
AlgozzineB., YsseldykeJ. E., & ChristiansenS. (1983). An analysis of the incidence of special education placement: The masses are burgeoning.Journal of Special Education, 17, 141–147.
3.
AllenJ. D. (2005). Grades as valid measures of academic achievement of classroom learning.The Clearing House, 78, 218–223.
4.
BarnesS. (1985). A study of classroom pupil evaluation: The missing link in teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education, 36(4), 46–49.
5.
BaronP. A. B. (2000, April). Consequential validity for high school grades: What is the meaning of grades for senders and receivers? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
6.
BeswickJ. F., WillmsJ. D., & SloatE. A. (2005). A comparative study of teacher ratings of emergent literacy skills and student performance on a standardized measure.Education, 126(1), 116–137.
7.
BrookhartS. M. (1993). Teachers’ grading practice: Meaning and values.Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 123–142.
8.
BrookhartS. M. (1994). Teachers’ grading: Practice and theory.Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 279–301.
9.
CernkovichS. A., & GiordanoP. C. (1992). School bonding, race, and delinquency.Criminology, 30, 261–291.
10.
ClewellB. C., & VillegasA. M. (1998). Increasing the number of teachers of color for urban schools: Lessons from the Pathways national evaluation.Education and Urban Society, 31(1), 42–61.
11.
CoutinhoM. J., & OswaldD. P. (2006). Disproportionate representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education: Measuring the problem.Tempe, AZ: NCCREST.
12.
CugmasZ. (2003). Social behaviors of children with different types of attachment toward their kindergarten teachers.Studia Psychologica, 45, 323–338.
13.
DanzigerS. K. (1995). Family life and teenage pregnancy in the inner-city: Experiences of African-American youth.Children and Youth Services Review, 7(1–2), 183–202.
14.
DeeT. S. (2005). A teacher like me: Does race, ethnicity or gender matter?American Economic Review, 95, 158–165.
15.
FergusonR. F. (1998). Teacher perceptions and expectations and the Black-White test score gap. In JenksC., & PhillipsM. (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap.Washington, DC: The Brookings Institutional Press.
16.
FriedmanS. J., & FrisbeeD. A. (2000). The influence of report cards on the validity of grades reported to parents.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 5–26.
17.
GerberM. M., & SemmelM. I. (1984). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process.Educational Psychologist, 19, 137–148.
18.
GoodmanR. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.
19.
GoodmanR. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337–1346.
20.
GottliebJ., & WeinbergS. (1999). Comparison of students referred and not referred for special education.Elementary School Journal, 99, 187–199.
21.
HamreB., & PiantaR. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade.Child Development, 72, 625–638.
22.
HillC. R., & HughesJ. N. (2007). An examination of the convergent and discriminant validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 380–406.
23.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24.
HowesC. (1997). Teacher-sensitivity, children's attachment and play with peers.Early Education and Development, 8(1), 41–49.
25.
HowesC., GalinskyE., & KontosS. (1998). Child care caregiver sensitivity and attachment.Social Development, 7(1), 25–36.
26.
HughesJ., CavellT., & JacksonT. (1999). Influence of the teacher-student relationship on childhood conduct problems: A prospective study.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 28(2), 173–184.
27.
HughesJ. N., CavellT. A., & WillsonV. (2001). Further support for the developmental significance of the quality of the teacher-student relationship.Journal of School Psychology, 39, 289–301.
28.
IrvineJ. J. (1990). Black students and school failure. Policies, practices, and prescriptions.Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED320992)
29.
KohnA. (1999). Grading is degrading.Education Digest, 65(1), 59–64.
30.
LaddG. W., & BurgessK. B. (2001). Do relational risks and protective factors moderate the linkages between childhood aggression and early psychological and school adjustment?Child Development, 72, 1579–1602.
31.
LeiterJ., & BrownJ. S. (1985). Determinants of elementary school grading.Sociology of Education, 58, 166–180.
32.
LomaxR. G. (1996). On becoming assessment literate: An initial look at preservice teachers’ beliefs and practices.Teacher Education, 31, 292–303.
33.
LosenD. J., & OrfieldG. (2002). Racial inequity in special education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
34.
MaddoxS. J., & PrinzR. J. (2003). School bonding in children and adolescents: Conceptualization, assessment, and associated variables.Clinical Child & Family Psychology Review, 6, 31–49.
35.
McMillanJ. H., MyranS., & WorkmanD. (2002). Elementary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices.Journal of Educational Research, 95, 203–213.
36.
MeehanB., HughesJ., & CavellT. (2003). Teacher-student relationships as compensatory resources for aggressive children.Child Development, 74, 1145–1157.
37.
MillerG. E., BrehmK., & WhitehouseS. (1998). Reconceptualizing school-based prevention for antisocial behavior within a resiliency framework.School Psychology Review, 27, 364–379.
38.
MossE., & St.-LaurentD. (2001). Attachment at school age and academic performance.Developmental Psychology, 37, 863–874.
39.
MurguiaD. E., ChenZ., & KaplanH. B. (1998). A comparison of causal factors in Mexican American and non-Hispanic white drug use: The effects of family and school on the acquisition of deviant peers and on early adult illicit drug use.Social Science Quarterly, 79, 341–360.
40.
MurrayC., & GreenbergM. T. (2000). Children's relationships with teachers and bonds with school: An investigation of patterns and correlates in middle childhood.Journal of School Psychology, 38, 423–445.
41.
MurrayC., & GreenbergM. T. (2001). Relationships with teachers and bonds with school: Social emotional adjustment correlates for children with and without disabilities.Psychology in the Schools, 38, 25–41.
42.
National Collaborative on Diversity in the Teaching Force. (2004). Assessment of diversity in America's teaching force: A call to action.Washington, DC: NEA.
43.
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2001). NICHD study of early child care and youth development data and documentation manual.Mahwah, NJ: Author.
44.
OgbuJ. (1995). Understanding cultural diversity and learning. In BanksJ. A., & McGee BanksC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 582–593). New York: Macmillan.
45.
OosterhofA. (2001). Classroom application of educational measurement.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
46.
OswaldD. P., CoutinhoM. J., BestA. M., & SinghN. N. (1999). Ethnic representation in special education: The influence of school-related economic and demographic variables.Journal of Special Education, 32, 194–206.
47.
PiantaR. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
48.
PiantaR. C., & NimitzS. L. (1991). Relationships between children and teachers: Associations with classroom and home behavior.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 12, 379–393.
49.
PiantaR. C., NimitzS. L., & BennettE. (1997). Mother-child relationships, teacher-child relationships, and school outcomes in preschool and kindergarten.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 263–280.
50.
PugachM. (1985). The limitations of federal special education policy: The role of classroom teachers in determining who is handicapped.Journal of Special Education, 19(1), 123–137.
51.
SaftE. W., & PiantaR. C. (2001). Teachers’ perceptions of their relationships with student: Effects of child age, gender, and ethnicity of teachers and children.School Psychology Quarterly, 16(2), 125–141.
52.
SbarraD., & PiantaR. (2001). Teacher ratings of behavior among African American and Caucasian children during the first two years of school.Psychology in the Schools, 38, 229–238.
53.
SerwatkaT. S., DeeringS., & GrantP. (1995). Disproportionate representation of African Americans in emotionally handicapped classes.Journal of Black Studies, 25, 492–506.
54.
SimpsonA. W., & EriksonM. T. (1983). Teachers’ verbal and non-verbal communication patterns as a function of teacher race, student gender and student race.American Education Research Journal, 20, 183–198.
55.
SmedjeH., BromanJ. E., HettaJ., & von KnorringA. L. (1999). Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, S(2), 63–70.
56.
SpivackC., MarcusJ., & SwiftM. (1986). Early classroom behavior and later misconduct.Developmental Psychology, 33, 124–131.
57.
SutherlandK. S., & OswaldD. P. (2005). The relationship between teacher and student behavior in classrooms for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Transactional processes.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14(1), 1–14.
58.
ThabetA. A., StretchD., & VostanisP. (2000). Child mental health problems in Arab children: Application of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire.International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 46, 266–280.
59.
ThorndykeR. M. (1997). Measurement and evaluation (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
60.
U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Disproportionality and overidentification.Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs.
61.
WaldronN., McLeskeyJ., SkibaR., JancausJ., & SchulmeyerC. (1998). High and low referring teachers: Two types of teachers-as-tests?School Psychology International, 19, 31–41.
62.
WalkerH. M., ColvinC., & RamseyE. (1995). Antisocial behavior in school: Strategies and best practices.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
63.
WatersE., & DeaneK. E. (1985). Defining and assessing individual differences in attachment relationships: Q-methodology and the organization of behavior in infancy and early childhood.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(2), 41–65.
64.
WernerE. E., & SmithR. S. (1989). Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth.New York: Adams, Bannister, Cox.
65.
WingerT. (2005). Grading to communicate.Educational Leadership, 63(3), 61–65.
66.
ZiontsL. (2005). Examining student-teacher relationships: A potential case for attachment theory? In KernsK., & RichardsonR. (Eds.), Attachment theory in middle childhood (pp. 231–254). New York: Guilford Press.
