The Impact of Targeted Classroom Interventions and Function-Based Behavior Interventions on Problem Behaviors of Students with Emotional/Behavioral Disorders
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2008
The Impact of Targeted Classroom Interventions and Function-Based Behavior Interventions on Problem Behaviors of Students with Emotional/Behavioral Disorders
The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of both functional behavior assessment-based interventions and targeted classroom interventions for reducing problem behaviors of children with emotional/behavioral disorders (EBD) in special education classrooms. Specifically, this study was interested in how interventions based on changes in classroom routines and instructional behaviors compared with interventions based on functional behavior assessment. Results demonstrated the effectiveness of incorporating effective classroom practices in reducing problem behaviors in special education classrooms for students with EBD. In addition, results demonstrated a clear additive effect when individually designed behavior interventions, based on functional behavior assessments, were incorporated following classroom intervention. Results confirm the importance of analyzing and manipulating environmental and instructional classroom variables as an essential step in the process of addressing problem behavior. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AxelrodS. (1987). Functional and structural analyses of behavior: Approaches leading to reduced use of punishment procedures?Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 165–178.
2.
BarlowD. H., & HersenM. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change, second edition.New York: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
BeydaS. D., ZentallS. S., & FerkoD. J. (2002). The relationship between teacher practices and the task-appropriate and social behavior of students with behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 27, 236–255.
4.
BijouS. W., PetersonR. F., & AultM. H. (1968). A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 175–191.
5.
BrophyJ., & GoodT. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillan.
6.
BurnettP. C. (2002). Teacher praise and feedback and students’ perceptions of the classroom environment.Educational Psychology, 22(1), 1–16.
7.
CarnineD. W. (1976). Effects of two teacher-presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 199–206.
8.
CarrE. C., HornerR. H., MarquisJ. C., TurnbullA. P., Magito-McLaughlinD., & McAteeM. A. (1999). Positive behavior support for people with developmental disabilities: A research synthesis.Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
9.
CartaJ. J., AtwaterJ. B., & SchwartzI. S. (1990). Special issue: Organizing caregiving environments for young children with handicaps.Education & Treatment of Children, 13, 298–315.
10.
CartaJ. J., AtwaterJ. B., SchwartzI. S., & MillerP. A. (1990). Applications of ecobehavioral analysis to the study of transitions across early childhood settings.Education and Treatment of Children, 13, 298–315.
11.
ConroyM. A., & StichterJ. (2003). The application of antecedents in the functional assessment process: Existing research, issues, and recommendations.Journal of Special Education, 37, 49–87.
12.
DavisC. A., & FoxJ. (1999). Evaluating environmental arrangement as setting events: Review and implications for measurement.Journal of Behavioral Education, 9, 77–96.
13.
DriscollC., & CarterM. (2004). Spatial density as a setting event for the social interaction of preschool children.International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 51(1), 7–37.
14.
DunlapG., KernL., dePerczelM., ClarkeS., WilsonD., & ChildsK. E. (1993). Functional analysis of classroom variables for students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 18, 275–291.
15.
ErvinR. A., RadfordP., BertschK., PiperA., EhrhardtK., & PolingA. (2001). A descriptive analysis and critique of the empirical literature on school-based functional assessment.School Psychology Review, 30, 193–210.
16.
FoxJ. J., & ConroyM. A. (1995). Setting events and behavioral disorders of children and youth: An interbehavioral field analysis for research and practice.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 3, 130–140.
17.
GunterP. L., DennyR. K., jackS. L., ShoresR. E., & NelsonC. M. (1993). Aversive stimuli in academic interactions between students with serious emotional disturbance and their teachers.Behavioral Disorders, 18, 265–274.
18.
HanleyG. P., IwataB. A., & LindbergJ. S. (1999). Analysis of activity preferences as a function of differential consequences.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 419–435.
19.
HornerR. H. (1994). Functional assessment: Contributions and future directions.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 401–404.
20.
IwataB. A., DorseyM. F., SliferK. J., BaumanK. E., & RichmanG. S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209.
21.
KameenuiE. J., & DarchC. B. (1995). Instructional classroom management: A proactive approach to behavior management.White Plains, NY: Longman.
22.
KampsD., KravitsT., RauchJ., KampsJ. L., & ChungN. (2001). A prevention program for students with or at risk for ED: Moderating effects of variation in treatment and classroom structure.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 141–154.
23.
KampsD., WendlandM., & CulpepperM. (2006). Active teacher participation in functional behavior assessment for students with emotional and behavioral disorders risks in general education classrooms.Behavioral Disorders, 31, 128–146.
24.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinics and applied settings.New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
KeoghB. K. (2000). Risk, families, and schools.Focus on Exceptional Children, 33(4), 1–10.
26.
KernsL., ChildsK., DunlapG., ClarkeS., & FalkG. D. (1994). Using assessment-based curricular intervention to improve the classroom behavior of a student with emotional and behavioral challenges.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 7–19.
27.
LewisT. J., & NewcomerL. L. (2004). Functional behavioral assessment: An investigation of assessment reliability and effectiveness of function-based interventions.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 168–181.
28.
LewisT. J., & SugaiG. (1996). Descriptive and experimental analysis of teacher and peer attention and the use of assessment-based intervention to improve pro-social behavior.Journal of Behavioral Education, 6(1), 7–24.
29.
MayerG. (1995). Preventing antisocial behavior in the schools.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 467–447.
30.
McGillP., TeerK., RyeL., & HughesD. (2003). Staff reports of setting events associated with challenging behavior.Behavior Modification, 27, 265–282.
31.
McGinnisE., & GoldsteinA. P. (1997). Skill streaming the elementary school child: New strategies and perspectives for teaching prosocial skills.Chicago: Research Press.
32.
MeyerK. A. (1999). Functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior exhibited by elementary school children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(2), 229–232.
33.
NewcomerL. L., & LewisT. J. (2004). Functional behavioral assessment: An investigation of assessment reliability and effectiveness of function-based interventions.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 168–181.
34.
NowacekE. J., McKinneyJ. D., & HallahanD. P. (1990). Instructional behaviors of more and less effective beginning regular and special educators.Exceptional Children, 57, 140–149.
35.
O'NeillR. E., HornerR. H., AlbinR. W., SpragueJ. R., StoreyK., & NewtonJ. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
36.
PfeffnerL. J., RosenL. A., & O'LearyS. G. (1985). The efficacy of an all positive approach to classroom management.Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 18, 257–261.
37.
ReedH., ThomasE., SpragueJ. R., & HornerR. H. (1997). The student guided functional assessment interview: An analysis of student and teacher agreement.Journal of Behavioral Education, 7(1), 33–49.
38.
ReynoldsC. R., & KamphausR. W. (1992). Behavioral assessment system for children.Circles Pine, MN: American Guidance Service.
39.
ShoresR. E., GunterP., DennyR. K., & JackS. L. (1993). Classroom influences on aggressive and disruptive behaviors of students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Focus on Exceptional Children, 26(2), 1–10.
40.
SimmonsD. C., & KameenuiE.J. (1990). The effect of task alternatives on vocabulary knowledge: A comparison of students with and without learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(5), 291–297, 316.
41.
SkinnerC. H., BelfioreP. J., MaceH. W., Williams-WilsonS., & JohnsG. A. (1997). Altering response topography to increase response efficiency and learning rates.School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 54–64.
42.
SkinnerC. H., FordJ. M., & YunkerB. D. (1991). A comparison of instructional response requirements on the multiplication performance of behaviorally disordered students.Behavioral Disorders, 17, 56–65.
43.
SkinnerC. H., & ShapiroE. S. (1989). A comparison of taped-words and drill interventions on reading fluency in adolescents with behavior disorders.Education and Treatment of Children, 12, 123–133.
44.
SkinnerC. H., SmithE. S., & McLeanJ. E. (1994). The effects of intertrial interval duration on sight-word learning rates in children with behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 19, 98–107.
45.
StichterJ., & ConroyM. (2003). Using structural analysis in natural settings: A responsive functional assessment strategy.Journal of Behavior Education, 14, 19–34.
46.
StichterJ. P., LewisT. J., JohnsonN., & TrussellR. (2004). Toward a structural assessment: Analyzing the merits of an assessment tool for a student with E/BD.Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30, 25–40.
47.
StichterJ. P., LewisT. J., WhittakerT., RichterM., JohnsonN., & TrussellR. P. (in press). Assessing opportunities to respond within inclusive classrooms: Utilizing the setting factors analysis tool to determine optimal rates and interactions of essential instructional variables.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions.
48.
SutherlandK. S., AlderN., & GunterP. L. (2003). The effect of varying rates of opportunities to respond to academic requests on the classroom behavior of students with EBD.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 239–248.
49.
SutherlandK. S., WehbyJ. H., & CopelandS. R. (2000). Effect of varying rates of behavior-specific praise on the on-task behavior of students with EBD.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8(1), 2–8.
50.
TappJ. T., WehbyJ. H., & EllisD. (1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 27, 25–31.
51.
ThomasD. R., BeckerW. C., & ArmstrongM. (1968). Production and elimination of disruptive classroom behavior by systematically varying teacher behavior.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 35–45.
52.
TobinK. (1983). The influence of wait time on classroom learning.European Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 35–48.
53.
TobinT. J., & SugaiG. M. (1999). Discipline problems, placements, and outcomes for students with serious emotional disturbance, Behavioral Disorders, 24, 109–121.
54.
WallaceT. R., AndersonA., BartholomayT., & HuppS. (2002). An ecobehavioral examination of high school classrooms that include students with disabilities.Exceptional Children, 68, 345–359.
55.
Van AckerR., GrantS. H., & HenryD. (1996). Teacher and student behavior as a function of risk for aggression.Education & Treatment of Children, 19, 316–334.
