As prevention and early intervention opportunities for young children at risk of emotional disturbance (ED) increase, questions regarding the effectiveness of these programs for specific subpopulations of children have emerged. To date, few investigators have examined young children entering early school prevention/intervention programs to determine if clear subpopulations can be identified, and if so, which characteristics are most distinguishing. This study examined the risk factors of 140 kindergarten and first-grade students, identified by teachers as at risk of ED, to determine if distinct profiles exist. Cluster analysis procedures using teacher, child, and parent reports of family, academic, and social/emotional data revealed five distinct clusters: Parent nominated (n = 24), Elevated risks (n = 43), Primarily behavior (n = 25), Primarily academic (n = 27), and False positives (n = 21). Validation techniques revealed that the five clusters were distinguished by clear profiles, which differed across level of severity (i.e., high or low levels of risk per domain) and primary focus of risk (i.e., academic, social/emotional, or familial). Similarities and differences across cluster groups, possible implications for targeted prevention or early intervention programs, study limitations, and directions for future research are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchenbachT. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 Profile.Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.
2.
BennettP. L. (2000). Children with emotional and behavioral difficulties and their parents.Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties, 5, 12–17.
3.
BrambringM., LoselF., & SkowronekH. (1989). Children at risk: Assessment, longitudinal research, and intervention.New York: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
4.
BrayJ. H. (1995). Current issues in evaluating families.Family Relations, 44, 469–477.
5.
ClarkeS. H., & CampbellF. A. (1998). Can intervention early prevent crime later? The Abecedarian Project compared with other programs.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13, 319–343.
6.
CullinanD., EpsteinM. H., & QuinnK. P. (1996). Patterns and correlates of personal, family, and prior placement variables in an interagency community based system of care.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 299–321.
7.
DemboR., & SchmeidlerJ. (2003). A classification of high-risk youths.Crime and Delinquency, 49, 201–230.
EpsteinM. H., & SharmaH. M. (1998). Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A strength based approach to assessment.Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
10.
FarmerT. W., FarmerE. M. Z., & GutD. (1999). Implications of social development research for school-based interventions for aggressive youth with EBD.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 7, 130–137.
11.
FeilE. G., WalkerH. M., & SeversonH. H. (1995). The Early Screening Project for young children with behavior problems.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 3, 194–209.
12.
GordonA. D. (1981). Classification: Monographs on applied probability and statistics.New York: Chapman and Hall.
13.
GreenbaumP. E., DedrickR. F., FriedmanR. M., KutashK., BrownE. C., LardierhS. P. (1996). National Adolescent and Child Treatment Study (NACTS): Outcomes for children with serious emotional and behavioral disturbance.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 130–146.
14.
GreshamF. M., & ElliottS. N. (1990). Social Skills Rating System manual.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
15.
GuralnickM. J. (2000). The effectiveness of early intervention.Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
16.
HarristA. W., ZaiaA. F., BatesJ. E., DodgeK. A., & PettitG. S. (1997). Subtypes of social withdrawal in early childhood: Sociometric status and social-cognitive differences across four years.Child Development, 68, 278–294.
17.
KauffmanJ. M. (2001). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
18.
KendallS. M., StuartA., & OrdJ. K. (1983). The advanced theory of statistics (Vol. III). New York: Macmallian Publishing Co., Inc.
19.
MontagueM. (2001). Classroom dynamics and children at risk: A follow up.Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 75–83.
20.
OlsonD. H., PortnerJ., & LaveeY. (1985). Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation.Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations, Inc.
21.
PevalinD. J., WadeT. J., & BranniganA. (2003). Precursors, consequences and implications for stability and change in pre-adolescent antisocial behaviors.Prevention Science, 4, 123–136.
22.
RosenblattJ., RobertsonL., BatesM., WoodM., FurlongM. J., & Sosna.,T. (1998). Troubled or troubling? Characteristics of youth referred to a system of care without system-level referral constraints.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 6, 42–54.
SatzP., & MorrisR. (1981). Learning disability subtypes: A review. In PirozzoloF. J., & WittrockM.C. (Eds.), Neuropsychological and cognitive processes in reading (pp. 109–141). New York: Academic Press.
25.
SpeeceD. L., & CooperD. H. (1990). Ontogeny of school failure: Classification of first-grade children.American Educational Research Journal, 27, 119–140.
26.
SpeeceD. L., RothF. P., CooperD. H., & De La PazS. (1999). The relevance of oral language skills in early literacy: A multivariate analysis.Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 167–190.
27.
SutherlandK. S., & WhebyJ. H. (2001). Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic behavioral outcomes of students with EBD: A review.Remedial and Special Education, 22, 113–121.
28.
TroutA. L., NordnessP. D., PierceC. D., & EpsteinM. H. (2003). Research on the academic status of students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A review of the literature from 1961–2000.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 198–210.
29.
U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2000). America's kindergartners.Washington, DC: Author.
30.
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (1999). Mental health: A report of the Surgeon General.Washington, DC: Author.
31.
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Mental Health (1998a). Taking stock of risk-factors for child/youth externalizing behavior problems.Washington DC: Author.
32.
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (1998b). Annual report to Congress on the evaluation of the comprehensive community mental health services for children and their families program. Available from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Web site: http://www.mentalhealth.org/publications/allpubs/CB-E199E/default.asp.
33.
WagnerM. M. (1995). Outcomes for youths with serious emotional disturbance in secondary school and early adulthood.Future of Children, 5, 90–112.
34.
WalkerH. M., & SeversonH. H. (1992). Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders technical manual.Longmont, CO: Sopris West Educational Services.
35.
WalkerH. M., SeversonH. H., & FeilE. G. (1995). Early Screening Project: A proven child find process (user manual).Longmont, CO: Sopris West Educational Services.
36.
Wicks-NelsonR., & IsraelA. C. (2003). Behavior disorders of childhood (5th ed.). Upper Saddle-River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
WoodcockR. W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests—revised.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
38.
WoodcockR., McGrewK. S., & MatherN. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement.Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
