Both law and pedagogy require that educators address behavior interfering with educational progress for students with disabilities. The reauthorized Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA, 2004) and its predecessor, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA, 1997a), require individualized education program (IEP) teams to develop behavioral improvement plans (BIPs) for students whose behavior impedes their performance or the performance of others. Yet neither statute provides guidance concerning the substantive components of these plans. The purpose of this article is to review the administrative decisions and case law addressing BIPs. Based on the review, five themes related to the development of appropriate BIPs were identified. A pedagogical review substantiated and enriched the emergent themes. Hopefully, this analysis will assist IEP teams in the development of appropriate and legally defensible BIPs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
*Alex R. v. Forrestville Valley Community Unit School District No. 221, 41 IDELR 146 (7th Cir. 2004).
2.
ArmstrongS. W., & KauffmanJ. M. (1999). Functional behavioral assessment: Introduction to the series.Behavioral Disorders, 24(2), 167–168.
3.
Assistance to States for the Education of Children With Disabilities, 300 C. F. R. Part 300, 70 Fed. Reg., 35833-35885 (June 21, 2005).
4.
*Augusta School District, 36 IDELR 229 (SEA AK 2001).
5.
*Baldwin County Board of Education, 39 IDELR 57 (SEA AL 2003).
6.
*Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, 27 IDELR 1000 (SEA NY 1998).
7.
*Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, 34 IDELR 193 (SEA NY 2000).
8.
*Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 553 IDELR 656 (S. Ct. 1982).
9.
*Board of Education of the Sacramento City Unified School District v. Rachel Holland, 20 IDELR 812 (9th Cir. 1994).
10.
*Board of Education of Township High School District No. 211 v. Lindsey R., 105 LRP 40802 (ND IL 2005).
11.
*Bonita Unified School District, 27 IDELR 248 (SEA CA 1997).
12.
*Bristol Township School District, 36 IDELR 145 (SEA PA 2002).
13.
Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice (1998). Addressing student problem behavior—Part II: Conducting a functional behavioral assessment.Washington, DC: Author.
14.
ChandlerL. K., & DahlquistC. M. (2002). Functional assessment: Strategies to prevent and remediate challenging behavior in school settings.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
15.
*Chicago Public Schools Local School District, 4 ECLPR 539 (SEA IL 2003).
16.
*Conroe Independent School District, 38IDELR53 (SEA TX 2002).
17.
ConroyM. A., & BrownW. J. (2004). Early identification, prevention, and early intervention with young children at risk for emotional or behavioral disorders: Issues, trends, and a call for action.Behavioral Disorders, 29(3), 224–236.
18.
Corona-Norco Unified School District, 30 IDELR 170 (SEA CA 1998).
19.
CroneD. A., & HornerR. H. (1999). Contextual, conceptual, and empirical foundations of functional behavioral assessment in schools.Exceptionality, 8(3), 161–172.
20.
*Daniel R. R. v. State Board of Education, 53 ELR 824 (5th Cir. 1989).
21.
DeveresL., & PitaskyV. (1999). Student behavior: Intervention and prevention strategies that work.Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.
22.
*Des Moines Independent School District and Heartland Area Education Agency, 36 IDELR 167 (SEA IA 2001).
23.
DunlapG., dePerczelM., ClarkeS., WilsonD., WrightS., & WhiteR. (1994). Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(3), 505–518.
24.
DuPaulG. J., EckertT. L., & McGoeyK. E. (1997). Interventions for students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: One size does not fit all.School Psychology Review, 26(3), 369–381.
25.
EllingsonS. A., MiltenbergerR. G., StrickerJ., GalenskyT. L., & GarlinghouseM. (2000). Functional assessment and intervention for challenging behaviors in the classroom by general classroom teachers.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 85–97.
EtscheidtS. (2002). Discipline provisions of IDEA: Misguided policy or tacit reform initiatives?Behavioral Disorders, 27(4), 408–422.
28.
EtscheidtS. (2003). Ascertaining the adequacy, scope and utility of district evaluations.Exceptional Children, 69(2), 227–247.
29.
FitzsimmonsM. K. (1998). Functional behavior assessment and behavior intervention plans. (Report No. EDO-EC- 98-9). Reston, VA: Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED429420).
30.
*Forrestville Valley Community Unit School District 221, 37 IDELR 209 (SEA IL 2002).
31.
FreyA. (2002). Predictors of placement recommendations for children with behavioral or emotional disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 27(2), 126–136.
32.
GableR. A. (1999). Functional assessment in school settings.Behavioral Disorders, 24(3), 246–252.
33.
GallM. D., BorgW. R., & GallJ. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction.White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers.
34.
GibbG. S., & WilderL. K. (2002). Using functional analysis to improve reading instruction for students with learning disabilities and emotional/behavioral disorders [Electronic version].Preventing School Failure, 46(4), 152–158.
35.
Greer v. Rome City School District, 762 F. Supp. 9366 (11th Cir. 1992).
36.
HeckerL., BurnsL., ElkindJ., ElkindK., & KatzL. (2002). Benefits of assistive reading software for students with attention disorders. [Electronic version].Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 243–273.
37.
*Hempfield School District, 28 IDELR 509 (SEA PA 1998).
38.
Hendrick Hudson District Board of Education v. Rowley, 102 S. Ct. 3034 (1982).
39.
HesterP., GableR. A., & ManningM. L. (2003). A positive learning environment approach to middle school instruction.Childhood Education79(3), 130–137.
40.
HornerR. H., CarrE. G., StrainP. S., ToddA. W., & ReedH. K. (2002). Problem behavior interventions for young children with autism: A research synthesis.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(5), 423–446.
41.
HornerR. H., SugaiG., ToddA. W., & Lewis-PalmerT. (2000). Elements of behavior support plans: A technical brief.Exceptionality, 8(3), 205–215.
42.
HuneB. J., & NelsonM. C. (2002). Effects of teaching a problem-solving strategy on preschool children with problem behavior.Behavioral Disorders, 27(3), 185–207.
43.
**Independent School District No. 279, Osseo Area Schools, 30 IDELR 645 (SEA MN 1999).
44.
*Independent School District No. 2310, 28 IDELR 933 (SEA MN 1998).
45.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Amendments of 1997. Public L. No. 105-17. 111 Stat. 37 (1997a).
46.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Amendments of 1997. 20 U.S.C. § 1414(b)(2)(A) (1997b).
47.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Amendments of 1997. 20 U.S.C. § 1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(III) (1997c).
48.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 2004. 20 U.S.C. § 1414(d)(3)(B)(i) (2004a).
49.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 2004. 20 U.S.C. § 1415(k)(1)(B)(i) (2004b).
50.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 2004. 20 U.S.C. §1415(k)(1)(B) (ii) (2004c).
51.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 2004. 20 U.S.C. § 1401(d)(1)(A) (2004d).
52.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 2004. 20 U.S.C. § 1414(d)(3)(B)(i) (2004e).
53.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 2004. 20 U.S.C. § 1401(c)(5)(F).
54.
*Ingram Independent School District, 35 IDELR (SEA TX 2001).
55.
*In re: Student with a Disability, 39 IDELR 200 (SEA VT 2003).
56.
*In re: Student with a Disability, 41 IDELR 115 (SEA WI 2003).
57.
*Jessieville School District, 28 IDELR 697 (SEA AK 1998).
58.
*Jim Thorpe Area School District, 29 IDELR 320 (SEA PA 1998).
59.
JohnsB. (2001). Here comes the judge: Lessons from the courts on behavioral intervention plans. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Council for Exceptional Children, Kansas City, MO, April 18–21, 2001. Retrieved February 1, 2005, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/.
60.
JolivetteK., Barton-ArwoodS., & ScottT. M. (2000). Functional behavioral assessment as a collaborative process among professionals.Education and Treatment of Children, 23(1), 298–313.
61.
JolivetteK., ScottT. M., & NelsonC. M. (2000). The link between functional behavior assessments (FBAs) and behavioral intervention plans (BIPs).ERIC Digest, E592, EDO-00–1. Retrieved February 1, 2005, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/.
62.
JolivetteK., WehbyJ., CanaleJ., & MasseyG. (2001). Effects of choice-making opportunities on the behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 26(2), 131–145.
63.
JosephG. E., & StrainP. S. (2003). Comprehensive evidence-based social-emotional curricula for young children: An analysis of efficacious adoption potential.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education23(2), 65–76.
64.
KatsiyannisA., & MaagJ. W. (1998). Disciplining students with disabilities: Issues and considerations for implementing IDEA '97.Behavioral Disorders, 23(4), 276–289.
65.
KernL., MantegnaM. E., VorndranC. M., BailinD., & HiltA. (2001). Choice of task sequence to reduce problem behaviors. [Electronic version].Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 3(1), 1–17.
66.
KorteringL. J., BrazielP. M., & TompkinsJ. R. (2002). The challenges of school completion among youths with behavioral disorders: Another side of the story.Behavioral Disorders, 27(2), 142–154.
67.
KupersmidtJ. B., BryantD., & WilloughbyM. T. (2000). Prevalence of aggressive behaviors among preschoolers in Head Start and community child care programs.Behavioral Disorders, 26(1), 42–52.
68.
LaneK. L., WehbyJ., MenziesH. M., DoukasG. L., MuntonS. M., & GreggR. M. (2003). Social skills instruction for students at risk for antisocial behavior: The effects of small-group instruction.Behavioral Disorders, 28(3), 229–248.
69.
Larson v. Independent School District No. 361, 40 IDELR 231 (D.C. MN 2004).
70.
LeCompteM.D., & PreissleJ. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research.San Diego: Academic Press.
71.
LewisT. J., HudsonS., RichterM., & JohnsonN. (2004). Scientifically supported practices in emotional and behavioral disorders: A proposed approach and brief review of current practices.Behavioral Disorders, 29(3), 247–259.
72.
*Lewisville Independent School District, 35 IDELR 236 (SEA TX 2001).
73.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
74.
*Little Rock School District, 37 IDELR 30 (SEA AK 2002).
75.
*Lodi Unified School District, 29 IDELR 826 (SEA CA 1998).
76.
**Lower Merion School District, 42 IDELR 256 (SEA PA 2004).
77.
MaagJ. W., & LarsonP. J. (2004). Training a general education teacher to apply functional assessment.Education and Treatment of Children, 27(1), 26–36.
78.
*Maine School Administrative District No. 61, 41 IDELR 172 (SEA ME 2004).
79.
*Mason City Community School District & Northern Trails Area Education Agency 2, 32 IDELR 216 (SEA IA 2001).
80.
*Mason City Community School District & Northern Trails Area Education Agency 2, 39 IDELR 25 (SEA IA 2003).
81.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
82.
MillerK. A., GunterP. J., VennM. L., HummelJ., & WileyL. P. (2003). Effects of curricular and materials modifications on academic performance and task engagement of three students with emotional or behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 28(2), 130–149.
83.
*Mobile County Board of Education, 40 IDELR 226 (SEA AL 2004).
84.
*Modesto City School District, 30 IDELR 170 (SEA CA 1998).
85.
*Montgomery County Board of Education, 41 IDELR 202 (SEA AL 2004).
86.
National Technical Assistance Center for Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (2005). Retrieved February 3, 2005, from http://www.pbis.org.
87.
NelsonJ. R., MathurS. R., & RutherfordR. B. (1999). Has public policy exceeded our knowledge base? A review of the functional behavioral assessment literature.Behavioral Disorders, 24(2), 169–179.
88.
*Neosho R-V School District v. Clark, 38 IDELR 61 (8th Cir. 2003).
89.
*Neshaminy School District, 29 IDELR 493 (SEA PA 1998).
90.
*Nevada School District, 37 IDELR 114 (SEA AK 2002).
91.
*Northeast Independent School District, 35 IDELR 229 (SEA TX 2001).
92.
*Oberti v. Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon School District, 83 ELR 1009 (3rd Cir. 1993).
93.
O'ReillyM. F., LaceyC., & LancioniG. E. (2000). Assessment of the influence of background noise on escape-maintained problem behavior and pain behavior in a child with Williams Syndrome.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33(4), 511–514.
94.
PattonM. W. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
95.
*Pell City Board of Education, 38 IDELR 253 (SEA AL 2003).
96.
PennoD. A., FrankA. R., & WackerD. P. (2000). Instructional accommodations for adolescent students with severe emotional or behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 25(4), 325–343.
97.
PresleyJ. A., & HughesC. (2000). Peers as teachers of anger management of high school students with behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 25(2), 114–130.
98.
*Quaker Valley School District, 31 IDELR 255 (SEA PA 1999).
99.
**Rancocas Valley Regional High School Board of Education, 40 IDELR 222 (SEA NJ 2003).
100.
ReeseR. M., RichmanD. M., ZarconeJ., & ZarconeT. (2003). Individualizing functional assessments for children with autism: The contribution of perseverative behavior and sensory disturbances to disruptive behavior.Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18(2), 89–96.
101.
*Roncker v. Walter, 9 ELR 827 (6th Cir. 1983).
102.
Sabella LevendoskiL., & CartledgeG. (2002). Self-monitoring for elementary school children with serious emotional disturbances: Classroom applications for increased academic responding.Behavioral Disorders, 25(3), 211–224.
103.
*Sandwich Community Unit School District No. 430, 35 IDELR 173 (SEA LA 2001).
104.
*San Juan Unified School District, 36 IDELR 198 (SEA CA 2002).
105.
*School District of Monona Grove, 27 IDELR 265 (SEA WI 1998).
106.
*Schooltown of Highlands and Northwest Special Education Cooperative, 44 IDELR 21 (SEA IN 2005).
107.
ScottT. M., BucalosA., LiaupsinC., NelsonC. M., JolivetteK., & DesheaL. (2004). Using functional behavior assessment in general education settings: Making a case for effectiveness and efficiency.Behavioral Disorders, 29(2), 189–201.
108.
ScottT. M., McIntyreJ., LiaupsinC., NelsonC. M., & ConroyM. (2004). An examination of functional behavior assessment in public school settings: Collaborative teams, experts, and methodology.Behavioral Disorders, 29(4), 384–395.
109.
SmithC. R., & KatsiyannisA. (2004). Behavior, discipline, and students with emotional or behavioral disorders: Promises to keep … Miles to go.Behavioral Disorders, 29(3), 289–299.
110.
SmithS. W., & DaunicA. P. (2004). Research on preventing behavior problems using a cognitive-behavioral intervention: Preliminary findings, challenges, and future directions.Behavioral Disorders, 30(1), 72–76.
111.
*South Pasadena Unified School District, 28 IDELR 1112 (SEA CA 1998).
112.
StraussA. L., & CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
113.
*St. Vrain Valley District RE-1J, 38 IDELR 258 (SEA CO 2003).
114.
SugaiG., HornerR. H., & SpragueJ. R. (1999). Functional-assessment-based behavior support planning: Research to practice.Behavioral Disorders, 24(3), 253–257.
115.
SutherlandK. S., WehbyJ. H., & CopelandS. R. (2000). Effects of varying rates of behavior-specific praise on the on-task behavior of students with E/BD.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 2–9.
116.
ToddA. W., HornerR. H., SugaiG., & SpragueJ. R. (1999). Effective behavior support: Strengthening school-wide systems through a team-based approach.Effective School Practices, 17(4), 23–27.
117.
UmbreitJ. (1995). Functional assessment and intervention in a regular classroom setting for the disruptive behavior of a student with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.Behavioral Disorders, 20(4), 267–278.
118.
*Upper Dublin School District, 41 IDELR 83 (SEA PA 2004).
119.
*Vidalia City Schools, 31 IDELR 124 (SEA GA 1999).
120.
*Wachusett Regional School District, 36 IDELR 23 (SEA MA 2002).
121.
*Warren County School District, 35 IDELR 22 (SEA PA 2001).
122.
*Watson Chapel School District, 27 IDELR 899 (SEA AK 1998).
123.
*Watson Chapel School District, 35 IDELR 288 (SEA AK 2001).
124.
WehbyJ. H., FalkK. B., Barton-ArwoodS. B., LaneK. L., & CooleyC. (2003). The impact of comprehensive reading instruction on the academic and social behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. [Electronic version].Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11(4), 225–241.
125.
*West Shore School District, 4 ECLPR 427 (SEA PA 2003).
126.
WheelerJ. J., & RicheyD. D. (2005). Behavior management: Principles and practices of positive behavior supports.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice-Hall.
127.
WilcoxB. L., TurnbullH. R., & TurnbullA. P. (1999–2000). Behavioral issues and the IDEA: Positive behavioral interventions and supports and the functional behavioral assessment in the disciplinary context.Exceptionality8(3), 173–187.
128.
*Windsor C-1 School District, 29 IDELR 170 (SEA MO 1998).
129.
YellM. L., BradleyR., & ShrinerJ. G. (1999). The IDEA amendments of 1997: A school-wide model for conducting functional behavioral assessment and developing behavior intervention plans.Education and Treatment of Children, 22(3), 244–266.
