We compared threats of violence made by K–12 students in special education (120 cases) or general education (136 cases) in schools that were implementing threat assessment guidelines for managing student threats of violence (Cornell, Sheras, Kaplan, McConville, Posey, Levy-Elkon, et al., 2004; Cornell & Sheras, in press). Students in special education made disproportionately more threats, as well as more severe threats, than peers in general education. Students classified as emotionally disturbed (ED) exhibited the highest threat rates. Nevertheless, use of school suspension as a disciplinary consequence for threats was consistent for students in special and general education, and few students were expelled. Our findings support the use of threat assessment to manage threats of violence by students in special education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarkleyR. A., FischerM., EdelbrockC. S., & SmallishL. (1990). The adolescent outcome of hyperactive children diagnosed by research criteria: I. An 8-year prospective follow-up study.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 546–557.
2.
ConroyM. A., KatsiyannisA., ClarkD., GableR. A., & FoxJ. J. (2002). State office of education practices implementing the IDEA disciplinary provisions.Behavioral Disorders, 27, 98–108.
3.
CooleyS. (1995). Suspension/expulsion of general and special education students in Kansas: A report to the Kansas state board of education.Topeka: Kansas State Board of Education.
4.
CornellD. G., & LoperA. B. (1996). High risk behavior in Virginia schools: A survey of middle and high school students.Charlottesville: Curry School of Education, University of Virginia.
5.
CornellD. G., & SherasP. L. (in press). Guidelines for responding to student threats of violence.Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
6.
CornellD., SherasP., KaplanS., Levy-ElkonA., McConvilleD.McKnightL., & PoseyJ. (2004). Guidelines for responding to student threats of violence: Field test of a threat assessment approach. In FurlongM. J., BatesP. M., SmithD. C., & KingeryP. M. (Eds.), Appraisal and prediction of school violence: Methods, issues, and contexts (pp. 11–36). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
FeinR. A., VossekuilF., & HoldenG. A. (1995). Threat assessment: An approach to prevent targeted violence.National Institute of Justice: Research in Action, 1-7 (NCJ 155000). Retrieved October 6, 2005, from http://www.ncjrs.org/txtfiles/threat.txt
9.
FeinR. A., VossekuilF., PollackW. S., BorumR., ModzeleskiW., & ReddyM. (2002). Threat assessment in schools: A guide to managing threatening situations and to creating safe school climates.Washington, DC: U.S. Secret Service and U.S. Department of Education.
10.
GlassG. V., & HopkinsK. D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
11.
HallahanD. P., & KauffmanJ. M. (2000). Exceptional learners: Introduction to special education (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
12.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Amendments of 1997.Public Law105–17.
13.
LeoneP. E., MayerM. J., MalmgrenK., & MeiselS. M. (2000). School violence and disruption: Rhetoric, reality, and reasonable balance.Focus on Exceptional Children, 33, 2–20.
14.
McFaddenA. C., MarshG. E., PriceB. J., & HwangY. (1992). A study of race and gender bias in the punishment of handicapped children.Urban Review, 24, 239–251.
15.
MorrisonG. M., & D'IncauB. (1997). The web of zero-tolerance: Characteristics of students who are recommended for expulsion from school.Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 316–335.
16.
MurphyK., & BarkleyR.A. (1996). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: Comorbidities and adaptive impairments.Comprehensive Psychiatry, 37, 393–401.
17.
Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP). (1997). Initial disciplinary guidance related to removal of children with disabilities from their current educational placement for ten school days or less. (OSEP Memorandum 97-7). Washington, DC: Author.
18.
O'TooleM. E. (2000). The school shooter: A threat assessment perspective.Quantico, Virginia: National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
19.
ReddyM., BorumR., BerglundJ., VossekuilB., FeinR., & ModzeleskiW. (2001). Evaluating risk for targeted violence in schools: Comparing risk assessment, threat assessment, and other approaches.Psychology in the Schools, 38, 157–172.
20.
RoseT. L. (1988). Current disciplinary practices with handicapped students: Suspensions and expulsions.Exceptional Children, 55, 230–239.
21.
Ryan-ArredondoK., RenoufK., EgyedC., DoxeyM., DobbinsM., SanchezS. (2001). Threats of violence in schools: The Dallas Independent School District's Response.Psychology in the Schools, 38, 185–196.
22.
SkibaR. J. (2002). Special education and school discipline: A precarious balance.Behavioral Disorders, 27, 81–97.
23.
SkibaR. J., & PetersonR. L. (1999). The dark side of zero tolerance: Can punishment lead to safe schools?Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 372–382.
24.
SkibaR. J., & PetersonR. L. (2000). School discipline at a crossroads: From zero tolerance to early response.Exceptional Children, 66, 335–347.
25.
SkibaR. J., PetersonR. L., & WilliamsT. (1997). Office referrals and suspension: Disciplinary intervention in middle schools.Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 295–315.
26.
SingerM. I., & FlanneryD. J. (2000). The relationship between children's threats of violence and violent behaviors.Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 154, 785–790.
27.
SpragueJ., WalkerH. M., StieberS., SimonsenB., NishiokaV., & WagnerL. (2001). Exploring the relationship between school discipline referrals and delinquency.Psychology in the Schools, 38, 197–206.
28.
TaylorJ. A., & BakerR. A. (2002). Discipline and the special education student.Educational Leadership, 59(4), 28–30.
29.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education and Planning and Evaluation Service. (2003). Report on state/territory implementation of the Gun-Free Schools Act: School year 2000–2001.Author.
30.
WrightJ. A., & DusekJ. B. (1998). Compiling school base rates for disruptive behaviors from student disciplinary referral data.School Psychology Review, 27, 138–147.
