Inclusion of students with disabilities, including children and youth diagnosed with emotional and behavioral disorders, has been a prominent and contentious issue for decades. Yet, in spite of the extraordinary attention given this topic, there has been a general absence of empirically sound research to guide policy and practice. This article discusses four research-oriented themes relative to inclusion of students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders (EBD) in general education settings: (a) the appropriateness and relevancy of current inclusion measurement targets; (b) the extent to which inclusion is a clearly identified and independent treatment variable; (c) the extent to which inclusion research has sufficient external validity to give it generalization value; and (d) the social validity value of research connected to inclusion of students with EBD.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlgozzineR. (2003). Scientifically based research: Who let the dogs out?Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28(3), 156–160.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
BartlettL. D., WeisensteinG. R., & EtscheidtS. (2002). Successful inclusion for educational leaders.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
4.
BlackmanH. P. (1992). Surmounting the disability of isolation.The School Administrator, 49(2), 28–29.
5.
CampbellD. T., & StanleyJ. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.Chicago: Rand McNally.
6.
ChardD. J. (2004). Maintaining the relationship between science and special education.Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 213–217.
7.
CookB. G. (2002). Inclusive attitudes, strengths, and weaknesses of pre-service general educators enrolled in a curriculum infusion teacher preparation program.Teacher Education and Special Education, 25(3), 262–277.
8.
CookB. G., TankersleyM., CookL., & LandrumT. (2000). Teachers’ attitudes toward their included students with disabilities.Exceptional Children, 67(1), 115–135.
9.
Coombs-RichardsonR., & MeadJ. (2001). Supporting general educators’ inclusive practices.Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(4), 383–390.
10.
CoutinhoM., & ReppA. (1999). Inclusion: The integration of students with disabilities.Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth Learning Publishing.
11.
CrockettJ. B., & KauffmanJ. M. (1999). The least restrictive environment: Its origins and interpretation in special education.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
DunnL. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded—Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.
13.
FriendM., & BursuckW. D. (1999). Including students with special needs.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
FuchsD., & FuchsL. S. (1992). Limitations of a feel-good approach to consultation.Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 3(2), 93–97.
15.
FuchsD., & FuchsL. S. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform.Exceptional Children, 60, 294–309.
16.
GerstenR., ChardD. J., & BakerS. (2000). Factors enhancing sustained use of research-based instructional practices.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 445–457.
17.
GerstenR., & WoodwardJ. (1990). Rethinking the regular education initiative: Focus on the classroom teacher.Remedial and Special Education, 11(3), 7–16.
18.
GreenwoodC. R. (2001). Science and students with learning and behavioral problems.Behavioral Disorders, 27, 37–52.
19.
GreshamF. (1982). Misguided mainstreaming: The case for social skills training with handicapped children.Exceptional Children, 48, 422–433.
20.
GreshamF. (1983a). Social skills assessment as a component of mainstreaming placement decisions.Exceptional Children, 48, 331–336.
21.
GreshamF. (1983b). Social validity in the assessment of children's social skills: Establishing standards for social competency.Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1, 297–307.
HunterD. (1999). Systems change and the transition to inclusive systems. In CoutinhoM. J., & ReppA.C. (Eds.), Inclusion: The integration of students with disabilities (pp. 135–151). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth Learning Publishing.
24.
IdolL., & WestJ. F. (1987). Consultation in special education (Part II): Training and practice.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(8), 474–494.
25.
KauffmanJ. (2005). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
26.
KauffmanJ., & HallahanD. (1993). Toward a comprehensive delivery system for special education. In GoodlandJ.I., & LovettT.C. (Eds.), Integrating general and special education (pp. 73–102). New York: Merrill Publishing.
27.
KauffmanJ., & HallahanD. (Eds.). (1995). The illusion of full inclusion: A comprehensive critique of a current special education bandwagon.Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
28.
KauffmanJ., & HallahanD. (Eds.). (2005). The illusion of full inclusion: A comprehensive critique of a current special education bandwagon (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
29.
KauffmanJ. M., LloydJ. W., HallahanD. P., & AstutoT. A. (Eds.). (1995). Issues in educational placement: Students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30.
KazdinA. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behaviour change through social validation.Behavior Modification, 1, 427–452.
31.
KazdinA. (1998). Research design in clinical psychology.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
32.
KeppelG. (1982). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
33.
KlingerJ. K., ArguellesM. E., HughesM. T., & VaughnS. (2001). Examining the schoolwide “spread” of research-based practices.Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 221–234.
34.
KnoffH. M. (1985). Attitudes toward mainstreaming: A status report and comparison of regular and special educators in New York and Massachusetts.Psychology in the Schools, 22, 410–418.
35.
LewisT. J., ChardD., & ScottT. M. (1994). Full inclusion and the education of children and youth with emotional and behavioural disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 19(4), 277–293.
36.
LiebermanL. M. (1992). Preserving special education … For those who need it. In StainbackW., & StainbackS. (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education (pp. 13–25). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
37.
LipskyD. K., & GartnerA. (1991). Restructuring for quality. In LloydJ.W., SinghN.N., & ReppA.C. (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 43–57). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing.
38.
LoeberR., & FarmingtonD. (2001). Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Group.
39.
MaagJ. (2004). Behavior management: From theoretical implications to practical applications.Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth Learning Publishing.
40.
MacMillanD. L. (1971). Special education for the mildly retarded: Servant or savant?Focus on Exceptional Children, 2, 1–11.
41.
MacMillanD. L., SemmelM. I., & GerberM. M. (1995). The social context: Then and now. In KauffmanJ. M., & HallahanD. P. (Eds.), The illusion of full inclusion (pp. 19–38). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
42.
MartinE. (1974). Some thoughts on mainstreaming.Exceptional Children, 41, 150–153.
43.
McLeskeyJ., HenryD., & HodgesD. (1998). Inclusion: Where is it happening?Teaching Exceptional Children, 31, 4–10.
44.
McLeskeyJ., & WaldronN. (2002). Professional development and inclusive schools: Reflections on effective practice.The Teacher Educator, 37(3), 159–172.
45.
MillerL. (1990). The regular education initiative and school reform: Lessons from the mainstream.Remedial and Special Education, 11(3), 17–22.
46.
MiniumE. W., & ClarkeR. B. (1982). Elements of statistical reasoning.New York: Wiley.
47.
MooreJ., & FineM. J. (1979). Regular and special class teachers’ perceptions of normal and exceptional children and their attitudes toward mainstreaming.Psychology in the Schools, 15, 253–259.
48.
MylesB. S., & SimpsonR. L. (1989). Regular educators’ modification preferences for mainstreaming mildly handicapped children.Journal of Special Education, 22(4), 479–492.
49.
MylesB. S., & SimpsonR. L. (1992). General educators’ mainstreaming preferences that facilitate acceptance of students with behavioral disorders and learning disabilities.Behavioral Disorders, 17(4), 305–315.
50.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 1400–1487.
51.
ReynoldsM. C., WangM. C., & WalbergH. J. (1987). The necessary restructuring of regular and special education.Exceptional Children, 53, 391–398.
52.
RosenbergM. S., WilsonR., MaheadyL., & SindelarP. T. (2003). Educating students with behavior disorders.Boston: Pearson & Allyn-Bacon.
53.
SalendS. J. (1990). Effective mainstreaming.New York: MacMillan.
54.
SassoG. M., SimpsonR. L., & NovakC. G. (1985). Procedures for facilitating integration of autistic children in public school settings.Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 233–246.
55.
ScruggsT., & MastropieriM. (1996). Teacher perceptions of mainstreaming/inclusion, 1958–1995: A research synthesis.Exceptional Children, 63(1), 59–74.
56.
ShavelsonR. J., & TowneL. (Eds.). (2002).Scientific research in education.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
57.
SimpsonR. L., de Boer-OttS., & MylesB. (2003). Inclusion of learners with autism spectrum disorders in general education settings.Topics in Language Disorders, 23(2), 116–133.
58.
SimpsonR. L., & MylesB. S. (1989). Parents’ mainstreaming modification preferences for children with educable mental handicaps, behavior disorders and learning disabilities.Psychology in the Schools, 26, 292–301.
59.
SimpsonR. L., & MylesB. S. (1991). Ancillary staff members’ mainstreaming recommendations for students with exceptionalities.Psychology in the Schools, 28(1), 26–32.
60.
SimpsonR., & SassoG. (1992). Full inclusion of students with autism in general education settings: Values vs. science.Focus on Autistic Behavior, 7(3), 1–13.
61.
StainbackS., & StainbackW. (1992). Schools as inclusive communities. In StainbackW., & StainbackS. (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives (pp. 29–44). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
62.
StainbackW., & StainbackS. (1991). A rationale for integration and restructuring: A synopsis. In LloydJ. W., SinghN. N., & ReppA. C. (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 226–239). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing.
63.
StanovichP. J., & StanovichJ. E. (2003). Using research and reason in education.Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
64.
U.S. Department of Education. (1990-2003). Twelfth annual to twenty-fifth annual reports to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.Washington, DC.
65.
U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Twenty-fifth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.Washington, DC: Author.
66.
VaughnS., SchummJ. S., JalladB., SlusherJ., & SaumellL. (1996). Teachers’ views of inclusion.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11(2), 96–106.
67.
WalkerH. M. (1986). The assessment for integration into mainstream settings (AIMS) assessment system: Rationale, instruments, procedures, and outcomes.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 15, 55–63.
68.
WalkerH. M., RamseyE., & GreshamF. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence based practices.Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth Learning Publishing.
WangM. C., ReynoldsM. C., & WalbergH. J. (1986). Rethinking special education.Educational Leadership, 44(1), 26–31.
71.
WargerC. D., & PugachM. C. (1996). Curriculum consideration in an inclusive environment.Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(8), 1–12.
72.
WertsM. G., WoleryM., SnyderE. D., & CladwellN. K. (1996). Teachers’ perceptions of supports critical to the success of inclusion programs.The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 21(1), 9–21.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
75.
WoodJ. W. (2002). Adapting instruction to accommodate students in inclusive settings.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
76.
YsseldykeJ. E., AlgozzineB., & ThurlowM. L. (1992). Critical issues in special education.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
77.
ZiontsP. (1997). Inclusion strategies for students with learning and behavior problems.Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
