In this study the authors examined the descriptive effects of adult proximity on the behaviors of six elementary-aged students with autism spectrum disorders served in general education settings. A descriptive analysis was conducted to determine the effects of adult proximity on the rate of challenging behaviors and academic engagement. In addition, lag sequential analyses were conducted examining the effects of adult proximity on the relationship between adult directives and subsequent target child behaviors. The results indicated that adult proximity positively increased the rates of engagement and the likelihood that engagement followed an adult directive for most of the participants. However, idiosyncratic differences between adult proximity and problem behaviors were found across the participants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChakrabartiS., & FombonneE. (2001). Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 3093–3099.
2.
ConroyM. A., & StichterJ. P. (2003). The application of antecedents in the functional assessment process: Existing research, issues, and recommendations.Journal of Special Education, 37, 15–25.
3.
ErvinR. A., KernL., ClarkeS., DuPaulG. J., DunlapG., & FrimanP. C. (2000). Evaluating assessment-based intervention strategies for students with ADHD and comorbid disorders within the natural classroom context.Behavioral Disorders, 25, 344–358.
4.
Gonzalez-LopezA., & KampsD. (1997). Social skills training to increase social interactions between children with autism and their typical peers.Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12, 2–14.
5.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings.New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
KoegelR. L., CamarataS. M., & KoegelL. K. (1994). Aggression and noncompliance: Behavior modification through naturalistic language remediation. In MatsonJ. L. (Ed.), Autism in children and adults: Etiology, assessment, and intervention (pp. 165–176). Pacific Grove, CA: Brookes/Cole.
7.
KoegelR. L., & KoegelL. K. (1995). Teaching children with autism: Strategies for initiating positive interactions and improving learning opportunities.Baltimore: Brookes.
8.
LalliJ. S., Mace.F. C., LivezeyK., & KatesK. (1998). Assessment of stimulus generalization gradients in the treatment of self-injurious behavior.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 479–483.
9.
McDonnellJ. (1998). Instruction for students with severe disabilities in general education settings.Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 199–215.
10.
MesibovG., & SheaV. (1996). Full inclusion and students with autism.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 337–346.
11.
OliverC., OxenerG., HearnM., & HallS. (2001). Effects of social proximity on multiple aggressive behaviors.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 85–88.
12.
ScheuermannB., & WebberJ. (2002). Autism: Teaching does make a difference.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
13.
ScottJ., ClarkC., & BradyM. (2000). Students with autism: Characteristics and instructional programming.San Diego: Singular.
14.
SidmanM. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology.New York: Basic Books.
15.
SiegelS. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences.New York: McGraw-Hill.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (1994-2001). [Sixteenth through twenty-third] Annual report[s] to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18.
Van HoutenR. V., NauP. A., MacKenzie-KeatingS. E., SameotoD., & ColavecchiaB. (1982). An analysis of some variables influencing the effectiveness of reprimands.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 65–83.
19.
WeissM. J., & HarrisS. L. (2001). Teaching social skills to people with autism.Behavior Modification, 25, 785–802.
20.
WertsM.G., ZigmondN., & LeeperD. C. (2001). Paraprofessional proximity and academic engagement: Students with disabilities in primary-aged classrooms.Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 424–440.
21.
WoleryM. (2000). Commentary: The environment as a source of variability: Implications for research with individuals who have autism.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 379–381.
22.
YoungB., SimpsonR. L., MylesB. M., & KampsD. M. (1997). An examination of paraprofessional involvement in supporting inclusion of students with autism.Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12, 31–38.
