We examined the effects of class-wide curricular modification on the engagement and challenging behaviors of students enrolled in a self-contained science class. Participants were six students between the ages of 13 and 14, all with labels of severe emotional disturbance in addition to a variety of other diagnoses. Class-wide curricular modifications consisted of providing opportunities for choice making and ensuring that activities were of high interest to students. Findings showed that the curricular modifications resulted in increased levels of engagement and decreased levels of problem behaviors. Results are discussed in the context of system-level behavior support within the school setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BambaraL. M., AgerC., & KogerF. (1994). The effects of choice and task preference on the work performance of adults with severe disabilities.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 555–556.
2.
BambaraL. M., KogerF., KatzerT., & DavenportT. (1995). Embedding choice in daily routines: An experimental case study.Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 185–195.
3.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BronfenbrennerU. (1989). Ecological systems theory. In VastaR. (Ed.), Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187–219). Grenwich, CT: JAI.
5.
ClarkeS., DunlapG., Foster-JohnsonL., ChildsK. E., WilsonD., WhiteR. (1995). Improving the conduct of students with behavioral disorders by incorporating student interests into curricular activities.Behavioral Disorders, 20, 221–237.
6.
ColeC. L., DavenportT. A., BambaraL. M., & AgerC. L. (1997). Effects of choice and task preference on the work performance of students with behavior problems.Behavior Disorders, 22, 65–74.
7.
ColvinG., Kame'enuiE., & SugaiG. (1993). Reconceptualizing behavior management and school-wide discipline in general education.Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 361–381.
8.
DurandV. M. (1999). Functional communication training using assistive devices: Recruiting natural communities of reinforcement.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 247–267.
9.
DwyerK. P., OsherD., & WargerW. (1998). Early warning, timely response: A guide to safe schools.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
10.
ErvinR. A., DuPaulG. J., KernL., & FrimanP. C. (1998). Classroom-based functional and adjunctive assessments: Proactive approaches to intervention selection for adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 65–78.
11.
FisherW. W., ThompsonR. H., PiazzaC. C., CroslandK., & GotjenD. (1997). On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 423–438.
12.
GarnerR., & HewardW. L., (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 63–71.
13.
HardingJ., WackerD. P., CooperL. J., AsmusJ., Jensen-KovolanP., & GrisolanoL. A. (1999). Combining descriptive and experimental analyses of young children with behavior problems in preschool settings.Behavior Modification, 23, 316–333.
14.
HardingJ., WackerD. P., CooperL. J., MillardT., & Jensen-KovolanP. (1994). Brief hierarchical assessment of potential treatment components with children in an outpatient clinic.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 291–300.
15.
HornerR. H., SpragueJ. T., O'BrienM., & Heath-fieldL. T. (1990). The role of response efficiency in the reduction of problem behaviors through functional equivalence training: A case study.Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 91–97.
16.
HornerR. H., & SugaiG. (2000). School-wide behavior support: An emerging initiative.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 231–232.
17.
KartubD. T., Taylor-GreeneS., MarchR. E., & HornerR. H. (2000). Reducing hallway noise: A systems approach.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 179–182.
18.
KernL., ChildsK. E., DunlapG., ClarkeS., & FalkG. D. (1993). Using assessment-based curricular intervention to improve the classroom behavior of a student with emotional and behavioral challenges.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 7–19.
19.
KernL., DunlapG., ChildsK. E., & ClarkeS. (1994). Use of a classwide self-management program to improve the behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Education and Treatment of Children, 17, 445–458.
20.
KernL., MantegnaM. E., VorndranC. M., BailinD., & HiltA. (2001). Choice of task sequence to increase engagement and reduce problem behaviors.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 3, 3–10.
21.
KernL., VorndranC. M., HiltA., RingdahlJ. E., AdelmanB. E., & DunlapG. (1998). Choice as an intervention to improve behavior: A review of the literature.Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 151–169.
22.
KnitzerJ., SteinbergZ., & FleischB. (1990). At the schoolhouse door.New York: Bank Street College of Education.
MathesP. G., FuchsD., & FuchsL. S. (1997). The efficacy of peer tutoring in reading for students with mild disabilities: A best-evidence synthesis.School Psychology Review, 23, 59–80.
25.
NakasatoJ. (2000). Data-based decision making in Hawaii's behavior support effort.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 247–251.
26.
NelsonJ. R., & RobertsM. L. (2000). Ongoing reciprocal teacher-student interactions involving disruptive behaviors in general education classrooms.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 27–37.
27.
PlasJ. M. (1986). Systems psychology in the schools.New York: Pergamon.
28.
PowellS., & NelsonB. (1997). Effects of choosing academic assignments on a student with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 181–183.
29.
QinZ., JohnsonD. W., & JohnsonR. T., (1995). Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving.Review of Educational Research, 65, 129–143.
30.
ReimersT. M., & WackerD. P. (1988). Parents’ rating of the acceptability of behavioral treatment recommendations made in an outpatient clinic: A preliminary analysis of the influence of treatment effectiveness.Behavioral Disorders, 14, 7–15.
31.
RomaniukC., & MiltenbergerR. G. (2001). The influence of preference and choice of activity on problem behavior.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 3, 152–159.
32.
SadlerC. (2000). Effective behavior support implementation at the district level: Tigard-Tualatin School District.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 241–243.
33.
ShoresR. E., GunterP. L., & JackS. L. (1993). Classroom management strategies: Are they setting events for coercion?Behavioral Disorders, 18, 92–102.
34.
SmithS. W., & FarrellD. T. (1993). Level system use in special education: Classroom intervention with prima facie appeal.Behavioral Disorders, 18, 251–264.
35.
SprickR., GarrisonM., & HowardL. (1998). CHAMPs: A proactive and positive approach to classroom management.Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
36.
SugaiG., & HornerR. H. (1999). Discipline and behavior support: Preferred processes and practices.Effective School Practices, 17, 10–22.
37.
SugaiG., HornerR. H., DunlapG., HienemanM., LewisT. J., NelsonC. M. (2000). Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 131–143.
38.
Taylor-GreeneS. J., & KartubD. T. (2000). Durable implementation of school-wide behavior support: The High Five Program.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 233–235.
39.
UmbreitJ., & BlairK. (1997). Using structural analysis to facilitate treatment of aggression and noncompliance in a young child at-risk for behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 22, 75–86.
