The 1997 Amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act brought together, for the first time, all of the disciplinary provisions pertaining to students with disabilities, attempting to guarantee a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) for students in special education while preserving a safe school environment for all students. Yet the discipline of special education students has continued to create controversy, with critics suggesting that those provisions create a dual system that limits the options of school administrators with respect to school discipline. A review of the literature reveals little or no evidence that suspension and expulsion make any contribution to reducing disruption or violence and some evidence that those procedures target certain populations disproportionately. Seeking to move toward a unified system of discipline that implements effective and accountable disciplinary options will be more likely to preserve FAPE and guarantee safe and civil schools for all children.
American Association of School Administrators (1998, September). Need for fairness creates state of emergency for IDEA.AASA Online. Retrieved from http://www.aasa.org/Advocacy/egis9-16-98.html
3.
American Psychological Association. (1993). Violence and youth: Psychology's response.Washington, DC: Author.
4.
BickelF., & QuallsR. (1980). The impact of school climate on suspension rates in the Jefferson County Public Schools.The Urban Review, 12, 79–86.
5.
BowditchC. (1993). Getting rid of troublemakers: High school disciplinary procedures and the production of dropouts.Social Problems, 40, 493–507.
6.
BrantlingerE. (1991). Social class distinctions in adolescents’ reports of problems and punishment in school.Behavioral Disorders, 17, 36–46.
7.
CalhounS. E. (1987). Are our future teachers prepared for the stress that lies ahead?The Clearing House, 6, 178–179.
8.
CarrE. G., & DurandV. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.
9.
CooleyS. (1995). Suspension/expulsion of regular and special education students in Kansas: A report to the Kansas State Board of Education.Topeka: Kansas State Board of Education.
10.
CostenbaderV. K., & MarksonS. (1994). School suspension: A survey of current policies and practices.NASSP Bulletin, 78, 103–107.
11.
DavisJ. E., & JordanW. J. (1994). The effects of school context, structure, and experiences on African American males in middle and high schools.Journal of Negro Education, 63, 570–587.
12.
Doe v. Koger, 489 F. Supp. 225 (N.D. Ind. 1979).
13.
DupperD. R., & BoschL. A. (1996). Reasons for school suspensions: An examination of data from one school district and recommendations for reducing suspensions.Journal for a Just and Caring Education, 2, 140–150.
14.
DwyerK., & OsherD. (2000). Safeguarding our children: An action guide.Washington, DC: U.S. Departments of Education and Justice, American Institutes for Research.
15.
DwyerK., OsherD., & WargerC. (1998). Early warning, timely response: A guide to safe schools.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
16.
EckenrodeJ., LairdM., & DorisJ. (1993). School performance and disciplinary problems among abused and neglected children.Developmental Psychology, 29, 53–62.
17.
EkstromR. B., GoertzM. E., PollackJ. M., & RockD. A. (1986). Who drops out of high school and why? Findings from a national study.Teachers College Record, 87, 357–373.
18.
ElliottD. S., HamburgB. A., & WilliamsK. R. (1998). Violence in American schools: A new perspective.New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
ElliottD., HatotN. J., SirovatkaP., & PotterB. B. (2001). Youth violence: A report of the Surgeon General.Washington, DC: Office of the U.S. Surgeon General.
20.
FineM. (1986). Why urban adolescents drop into and out of public high school.Teachers College Record, 87, 393–409.
21.
GlackmanT., MartinR., HymanI., McDowellE., BervV., & SpinoP. (1978). Corporal punishment, school suspension, and the civil rights of students: An analysis of Office for Civil Rights school surveys.Inequality in Education, 23, 61–65.
22.
GottfredsonD. (1997). School-based crime prevention. In ShermanL., GottfredsonD., MacKenzieD., EckJ., RuterP., & BushwayS. (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising: A report to the United States Congress (pp. 1–74). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
23.
GregoryJ. F. (1996). The crime of punishment: Racial and gender disparities in the use of corporal punishment in the U.S. public schools.Journal of Negro Education, 64, 454–462.
24.
“Groups critical of no second chances school proposal.” (1999, January 27). Baltimore Sun, p. 4B.
25.
Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994, Public Law 103-382, 108 Statute 3907, Title 14.
26.
H. R. 1, The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Amendment 13.
27.
HartwigE. P., & RueschG. M. (2000). Disciplining students in special education.Journal of Special Education, 33, 240–247.
28.
HawkinsJ. D., HerrenkohlT. I., FerringtonD. P., BrewerD., CatalanoR. F., HarachiT. W., & CothernL. (2000, April). Predictors of youth violence.Juvenile Justice Bulletin.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
29.
HellmanD. A., & BeatonS. (1986). The pattern of violence in urban public schools: The influence of school and community.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 23, 102–127.
ImichA. J. (1994). Exclusions from school: Current trends and issues.Educational Research, 36(1), 3–11.
33.
Improving America's Schools Act, PL. 103-382, Sect. 314(a) (1994).
34.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1401 et seq; Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Public Law 105-17, 105th Cong., 1st Sess.; Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Regulations, 34 C.F.R. 300.1 et seq.
35.
IwataB. A., DorseyM. F., SliferK. J., BaumanK. E., & RichmanG. S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury.Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20.
36.
JohnsB. H. (1998). What the new Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) means for students who exhibit aggressive or violent behavior.Preventing School Failure, 42(3), 102–105.
37.
JonesN. L. (2001, June 22). Amendments relating to the discipline of children with disabilities in H. R. 1 and S. 1, 107th Congress. CRS Report for Congress.
38.
KaeserS. C. (1979). Suspensions in school discipline.Education and Urban Society, 11, 465–484.
39.
KatsiyannisA., & MaagJ. W. (1998). Disciplining students with disabilities: Issues and considerations for implementing IDEA ‘97.Behavioral Disorders, 23, 276–289.
40.
KochK. (2000, March). Zero tolerance: Is mandatory punishment in schools unfair?Congressional Quarterly Researcher, 10(9), 185–208.
41.
LeoneP. E., MayerM. J., MalmgrenK., & MeiselS. M. (2000). School violence and disruption: Rhetoric, reality, and reasonable balance.Focus on Exceptional Children, 33(1), 1–20.
42.
LeyserY. (1986). Competencies needed for teaching individuals with special needs: The perspective of student teachers.The Clearing House, 59, 179–181.
43.
LietzJ. J., & GregoryM. K. (1978). Pupil race and sex determinants of office and exceptional education referrals.Educational Research Quarterly, 3(2), 61–66.
44.
MansfieldW., & FarrisE. (1992). Office for Civil Rights survey redesign: A feasibility study.Rockville, MD: Westat.
45.
Massachusetts Advocacy Center. (1986). The way out: Student exclusion practices in Boston middle schools.Boston: Author.
46.
McCarthyJ. D., & HogeD. R. (1987). The social construction of school punishment: Racial disadvantage out of universalistic process.Social Forces, 65, 1101–1120.
47.
McCarthyM. M., Cambron-McCabeN. H., & ThomasS. B. (1998). Public school law: Teacher and students’ rights.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
48.
McFaddenA. C., MarshG. E., PriceB. J., & HwangY. (1992). A study of race and gender bias in the punishment of handicapped school children.Urban Review, 24, 239–251.
49.
Metropolitan Sch. Dist. of Wayne Township v. Davi-a, 969 F. 2d 485 (7th Cir. 1992). cert. denied. 507 U.S. 949 (1992).
50.
MihalicS., IrwinK., ElliottD., FaganA., & HansenD. (2001, July). Blueprints for violence prevention (OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin). Retrieved from U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Web site: http://ncjrs.org/html/ojjdp/jjbul2001_7_3/contents.html.
51.
Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia, 348 F. Supp. 866 (D.D.C. 1972).
52.
Morgan-D'AtrioC., NorthrupJ., LaFleurL., & SperaS. (1996). Toward prescriptive alternatives to suspensions: A preliminary evaluation.Behavioral Disorders, 21, 190–200.
53.
MorrisonG. M., & D'IncauB. (1997). The web of zero-tolerance: Characteristics of students who are recommended for expulsion from school.Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 316–335.
54.
National Association of Secondary School Principals. (2000, February). Statement on civil rights implications of zero tolerance programs. Testimony presented to the United States Commission on Civil Rights, Washington, DC.
55.
NelsonJ. R., MathurS. R., & RutherfordR. B. (1999). Has public policy exceeded our knowledge base? A review of the functional behavioral assessment literature.Behavioral Disorders, 24, 169–179.
56.
OCR Letter of Finding, EHLR 307.06 (Office for Civil Rights, 1988).
57.
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services. (1989). New letter, EHLR213:258.
58.
OsborneA. G. (1998). The principal and discipline with special education students.NASSP Bulletin, 82(599), 1–8.
59.
Office of Special Education Programs. (1995). [OSEP Memorandum 95-16, 22 IDELR 531]. Washington, DC: Author.
60.
Office of Special Education Programs. (1997). Initial disciplinary guidance related to removal of children with disabilities from their current educational placement for ten school days or less. [OSEP Memorandum 97–7]. Washington, DC: Author.
61.
PattersonG. R. (1992). Developmental changes in antisocial behavior. In PetersR. D., McMahonR. J., & QuinseyV. L. (Eds.), Aggression and violence throughout the life span (pp. 52–82). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
62.
RoseT. L. (1988). Current disciplinary practices with handicapped students: Suspensions and expulsions.Exceptional Children, 55, 230–239.
63.
Rutherford Institute. (2000). Eighth-grade student suspended for saving friend's life: Rutherford attorneys file complaint in circuit court. [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.rutherford.org/courts/hot-cases.asp#18
64.
S-1 v. Turlington, 635 F. 2d (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1030 (1981).
65.
S. 1, The Better Education for Students and Teachers Act of 2001, Amendment 604.
66.
S. Rept. 105-17, 105th Congress, 1st Sess. 28 (1997).
67.
ShawS. R., & BradenJ. P. (1990). Race and gender bias in the administration of corporal punishment.School Psychology Review, 19, 378–383.
68.
SinclairB. (1999). Report on state implementation of the Gun-Free Schools Act: School year 1997–98.Rockville, MD: Westat.
69.
SkibaR. J., & PetersonR. L. (2000). School discipline: From zero tolerance to early response.Exceptional Children, 66, 335–347.
70.
SkibaR. J., PetersonR. L., & WilliamsT. (1997). Office referrals and suspension: Disciplinary intervention in middle schools.Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 295–315.
71.
SkibaR. J., MichaelR. S., NardoA. C., & PetersonR. (in press). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment.Urban Review.
72.
SmithC.R. (2000). Behavioral and discipline provisions of IDEA ‘97: Implicit competencies yet to be confirmed.Exceptional Children, 66, 403–412.
73.
TaylorM.C., & FosterG. A. (1986). Bad boys and school suspensions: Public policy implications for black males.Sociological Inquiry, 56, 498–506.
74.
ThorntonC. H., & TrentW. (1988). School desegregation and suspension in East Baton Rouge Parish: A preliminary report.Journal of Negro Education, 57, 482–501.
75.
ThorntonT. N., CraftC. A., DahlbergL. L., LynchB. S., & BaerK. (2000). Best practices of youth violence prevention: A sourcebook for community action.Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
76.
TobinT., SugaiG., & ColvinG. (1996). Patterns in middle school discipline records.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 82–94.
77.
TolanP. H., GuerraN. G., & KendallP. C. (1995). Introduction to special section: Prediction and prevention of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(4), 515–517.
78.
WalkerH. M., HornerR. H., SugaiG., BullisM., SpragueJ. R., BrickerD., & KaufmanM. J. (1996). Integrated approaches to preventing antisocial behavior patterns among school-age children and youth.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 194–209.
