This article is part of a larger study of public attitudes toward immigration in seven countries that historically and currently have had different policies and practices vis-a-vis immigration. The countries involved are Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Japan and the United States. The time frame for which most of the public opinion data will be reported is from 1970 through 1995. The data have been collected from national surveys that were conducted in each of the countries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Institute of Public Opinion (AIPO)1993 POLL Date. Storrs, CT: Roper Center.
2.
AndersonA., StrawL., EinesG., HorsmanC. and LalaniM.1994“Canada.” In International Immigration and Nationality Law: Immigration Supplement 2. Ed. CampbellD. and FisherJ.Boston: Nihoff1993.
3.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS)1992Australian Population Trends and Prospects, 1990.Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
4.
Citizenship and Immigration Canada. Strategic Research, Analysis and Information Branch Policy Sector1994Facts and Figures.Ottawa: Minister of Supplies and Services.
5.
ConveyM. and KupiszewskiM.1995“Keeping Up with Schengen: Migration and Policy in the European Union.”International Migration Review, 29(4):939–961.
6.
DonleC. and KatherP.1994“Germany.” In International Immigration and Nationality Law: Immigration Supplement 2. Ed. CampbellD. and FisherJ.Boston: Nihoff Publishers.
7.
Gallup Organization1993Gallup Poll: International Public Opinion Data.
8.
GarzI. N. and Rivera-BatzF.1994“Unemployment and Attitudes towards Foreigners in Germany.” In Studies in Contemporary Economics. Ed. SteinmannG. and UlrichR. E.Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
9.
HammarT.1985European Immigration Policy: A Comparative Study.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
HawkinsF.1988Canada and Immigration: Public Policy and Public Concern.Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.
11.
HollifieldJ. F.1986“Immigration Policy in France and Germany: Outputs versus Outcome,”Annals, 485. May.
12.
KurthenH.1995“Germany at the Crossroads: National Identity and the Challenge of Immigration.”International Migration Review, 29(4):914–937.
13.
LevyM.1991“A Clarification: Foreigners, Immigrants, French Citizens of Foreign Origin,”Newsletter of The National Institute for the Study of Demography. December.
14.
LondonH. I.1970Non-White Immigration and the “White Australia” Policy. New York: New York University Press.
15.
MacuraM. and ColemanD.1994“International Migration: Regional Processes and Responses,”International Migration Review, 29(4):9l4–937.
16.
OgdenP. E.1991“Immigration to France since 1945: Myth and Reality,”Ethnic and Racial Studies, 14:294–318. July.
17.
Roper Organization, Inc.1996Negative Population Growth.Roper.
18.
SaulwickI. and Associates 1991Saulwick Poll, October, 1991.Canberra: Saulwick and Associates.
19.
ShimizuA.1994“Japan.” In International Immigration and Nationality Law: Immigration Supplement 2. Ed. CampbellD. and FisherJ.Boston: Nihoff Publishers.
20.
SimonR. J. and AlexanderS. H.1993The Ambivalent Welcome: Print Media, Public Opinion and Immigration.Westport, CT: Praeger.
21.
TaguchiS.1983“A Note on Current Research of Immigrant Groups in Japan,”International Migration Review, 17(4):699–714.
22.
ThomasD. G. and FlynnM. J.1994“Australia.” In International Immigration and Nationality Law: Immigration Supplement 2. Ed. CampbellD. and FisherJ.Boston: Nihoff Publishers.
23.
U.S. Department of Immigration and Naturalization1996Statistical Yearbook, 1995. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
24.
U.S. Department of Immigration and Naturalization1993Statistical Yearbook, 1992. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
25.
ZimmermanK. F.1995“Tackling the European Migration Problem,”Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2):45–62. Spring.
