The legalization strategies pursued by Salvadoran immigrants and activists from the 1980s to the present demonstrate that migrants’ and advocates’ responses to policy changes reinterpret law in ways that affect future policy. Law is critical to immigrants’ strategies in that legal status is increasingly a prerequisite for rights and services and that immigration law is embedded in other institutions and relationships. Immigration law is defined, however, not only when it is first formulated but also as it is implemented, enabling the immigrants who are defined according to legal categories to shape the definitions that categorization produces. Immigrants and activists also take formal legal and political actions, such as lobbying Congress and filing class action suits. Through such formal and informal policy negotiations, immigrants seek to shape their own and their nations’ futures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ACLU Immigrants Rights Project et al.1996Background Materials: The 1996 Immigration Law.Los Angeles, CA: National Immigration Law Center.
2.
AguayoS. and FagenP. W.1988Central Americans in Mexico and the United States: Unilateral, Bilateral, and Regional Perspectives.Washington, DC: Center for Immigration Policy and Refugee Assistance, Georgetown University.
3.
AnkerD.1992“Determining Asylum Claims in the United States: A Case Study on the Implementation of Legal Norms in an Unstructured Adjudicatory Environment,”New York University of Law and Social Change, 19(3):433–528.
4.
BachR. L.1990“Immigration and U.S. Foreign Policy in Latin America and the Caribbean.” In Immigration and U.S. Foreign Policy. Ed. TuckerBoulder, CO: Westview Press. Pp. 123–149.
5.
BachR. L.1978“Mexican Immigration and the American State,”International Migration Review, 12(4):536–558.
6.
Basta1986“Total Number of Sanctuaries 7/82 to 10/86,”Basta, 35. December.
7.
BeanF. D., EdmonstonB. and PasselJ. S., eds. 1990Undocumented Migration to the United States: IRCA and the Experience of the 1980s.Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
8.
BlumC. P.1991“The Settlement of American Baptist Churches v. Thornburg. Landmark Victory for Central American Asylum-Seekers,”International Journal of Refugee Law, 3(2):347–356.
9.
BosniakL. S.1991“Human Rights, State Sovereignty and the Protection of Undocumented Migrants under the International Migrant Workers Convention,”International Migration Review, 25(4):737–770.
10.
BriggsV. M.Jr.1984Immigration Policy and the American Labor Force.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
BurnsA. F.1993Maya in Exile: Guatemalans in Florida.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
12.
BustamanteJ.1990“Undocumented Migration from Mexico to the United States: Preliminary Findings of the Zapata Canyon Project.” In Undocumented Migration to the United States: IRCA and the Experience of the 1980s. Ed. BeanF. D., EdmonstonB. and PasselJ. S.Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. Pp. 211–226.
13.
CalavitaK.1992Inside the State: The Bracero Program, Immigration, and the I.N.S.New York: Routledge.
14.
CalavitaK.1990“Employer Sanctions Violations: Toward a Dialectical Model of White-collar Crime.”Law and Society Review, 24(4):1041–1069.
15.
CastlesS. and MillerM. J.1993The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World.New York: Guilford Press.
16.
ChockP. P.1991“‘Illegal Aliens’ and ‘Opportunity’: Myth-making in Congressional Testimony,”American Ethnologist, 18:279–294.
17.
CollierJ.1973Law and Social Change in Zinacantan.Stanford: Stanford University Press.
18.
ComaroffJ. L. and RobertsS.1981Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, Subcommittee on Immigration and Refugee Policy1983Refugee Problems in Central America.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20.
Comptroller General of the United States1984Central American Refugees: Regional Conditions and Prospects and Potential Impact on the United States.Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
21.
CoutinS. B.1995“Smugglers or Samaritans in Tucson, Arizona: Producing and Contesting Legal Truth,”American Ethnologist, 22(3):549–571.
22.
CoutinS. B.1993The Culture of Protest: Religious Activism and the U.S. Sanctuary Movement.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
23.
CoutinS. B. and ChockP. P.1995 ‘“Your Friend, the Illegal’: Definition and Paradox in Newspaper Accounts of U.S. Immigration Reform,” Identities, 2 (1–2): 123–148.
24.
DarlingJ.1996“U.S. Dollars Sent South Now Fuel Salvador Economy,”Los Angeles Times, A1, A6.
25.
de WendenC. W.1994“The French Response to the Asylum Seeker, 1980–93,”The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 534:81–90.
26.
DominguezJ. I.1990“Immigration as Foreign Policy in U.S.-Latin American Relations.” In Immigration and U.S. Foreign Policy. Ed. TuckerBoulder, CO: Westview Press. Pp. 150–166.
27.
FerrisE. G.1987The Central American Refugees.New York: Praeger.
28.
FiederleinS. L.1992“Responding to Central American Refugees: Comparing Policy Design in Mexico and the United States.”Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona.
29.
FiederleinS. L.1991“Interpreting International and Domestic Law Concerning Refugees: The U.S. Government vs. the Sanctuary Movement,”Journal of Borderlands Studies, 6(1):23–50.
30.
FrancisS. T.1986Smuggling Revolution: The Sanctuary Movement in America.Washington, DC: Capital Research Center.
31.
FreemanG. P.1992“Migration Policy and Politics in the Receiving States,”International Migration Review, 26(4):1144–1166.
32.
FrelickB. and KohnenB.1994“Filling the Gap: Temporary Protected Status.”Washington, DC: U.S. Committee for Refugees.
33.
FuchsL. H.1985“The Search for a Sound Immigration Policy: A Personal View.” In Clamor at the Gates. Ed. GlazerN.San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.
34.
General Accounting Office, U.S.1987“Illegal Aliens: Extent of Problems Experienced by Returned Salvadorans Not Determinable.”Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
35.
Glick-SchillerN., BaschL. and Szanton-BlancC.1995“From Immigrant to Transmigrant: Theorizing Transnational Migration,”Anthropological Quarterly, 68(1):48–63.
36.
Glick-SchillerN. and FouronG.1990 ‘“Everywhere We Go, We Are in Danger:’ Ti Manno and the Emergence of a Haitian Transnational Identity,” American Ethnologist, 17:329–347.
37.
HaganJ. M. and BakerS. G.1993“Implementing the U.S. Legalization Program: The Influence of Immigrant Communities and Local Agencies on Immigration Policy Reform,”International Migration Review, 27(3):513–536.
38.
HamiltonN. and ChinchillaN. S.1991“Central American Migration: A Framework for Analysis,”Latin American Research Review, 26(1):75–110.
39.
HammarT.1994“Legal Time of Residence and the Status of Immigrants.” In From Aliens to Citizens: Redefining the Status of Immigrants in Europe. Ed. BaubockR.Aldershot: Avebury.
40.
HammarT.1990Democracy and the Nation State: Aliens, Denizens and Citizens in a World of International Migration.Aldershot: Avebury.
41.
HarwoodE.1986In Liberty's Shadow: Illegal Aliens and Immigration Law Enforcement.Stanford: Stanford University Press.
42.
HarwoodE.1985“How Should We Enforce Immigration Law?” In Clamor at the Gates. Ed. GlazerN.San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.
43.
HatfieldM., LeachJ. and MillerG.1988“Bankrolling Failure: Urgent Need for Reform of El Salvador Policy” (excerpt of report to the Arms Control and Foreign Policy Caucus), Exodus, 7(3):1, 4.
44.
HolstonJ. and AppaduraiA.1996“Cities and Citizenship,”Public Culture, 8:187–204.
45.
IngramH. M. and FiederleinS. L.1988“Traversing Boundaries: A Public Policy Approach to the Analysis of Foreign Policy,”The Western Political Quarterly, 41(4):725–746.
46.
Interpreter Releases1990a “Congress Approves Major Immigration Reform,”Interpreter Releases, 67(41):1209–1215.
47.
Interpreter Releases1990b “Section-by-section Summary of the ‘Immigration Act of 1990,'”Interpreter Releases, 67(42):1277–1292.
48.
JenkinsC.1978“The Demand for Immigrant Workers: Labor Scarcity or Social Control?”International Migration Review, 12(4):514–535.
49.
KearneyM.1986“From the Invisible Hand to Visible Feet: Anthropological Studies of Migration and Development,”Annual Review of Anthropology, 15:331–361.
50.
La Opinion1996“Reformas en EU Afectaran a El Salvador: Ponen en peligro el envio de remesas familiares,”La Opinion, 3A, 5A.
51.
MahlerS. J.1995American Dreaming: Immigrant Life on the Margins.Princeton, NJ: PrincetonUniversity Press.
52.
MalkkiL.1992“National Geographic: The Rooting of Peoples and the Territorialization of National Identity Among Scholars and Refugees,”Cultural Anthropology, 7(1):24–44.
53.
MaloneyW. A., JordanG. and McLaughlinA. M.1994“Interest Groups and Public Policy: The Insider/Outsider Model Revisited,”Journal of Public Policy, 14(1):17–38.
54.
MatherL. and YngvessonB.1980–1981 “Language, Audience, and the Transformation of Disputes,”Law and Society Review, 15 (3–4): 775–821.
55.
MayP. J.1991“Reconsidering Policy Design: Policies and Publics,”Journal of Public Policy, 11(2):186–206.
56.
McDonnellP. J.1997“Immigrants’ Plight at Issue in Costa Rica Talks,”Los Angeles Times, A32.
57.
MerryS. E.1990Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
MillerH. N.1985‘“The Right Thing to Do’: A History of Simpson-Mazzoli.” In Clamor at the Gates. Ed. GlazerN.San Francisco, CA: ICS Press. Pp. 49–71.
59.
MillerM. J.1981Foreign Workers in Western Europe: An Emerging Political Force.New York: Praeger.
60.
PirieS. H.1990“The Origins of a Political Trial: The Sanctuary Movement and Political Justice,”Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 2(2):381–416.
61.
PoitrasG.1983“Through the Revolving Door: Central American Manpower in the United States,”Inter-American Economic Affairs, 36(4):63–78.
62.
PortesA.1981“Modes of Structural Incorporation and Present Theories of Immigration.” In Global Trends in Migration. Ed. KritzM. M.New York: Center for Migration Studies. Pp. 279–297.
63.
PortesA.1978“Toward a Structural Analysis of Illegal (Undocumented) Immigration,”International Migration Review, 12(4):469–484.
64.
RodriguezN. P.1987“Undocumented Central Americans in Houston: Diverse Populations,”International Migration Review, 21(1):4–26.
65.
RubinR.1991“Ten Years After: Vindication for Salvadorans and New Promises for Safe Haven and Refugee Protection,”Interpreter Releases, 68(4):97–109.
66.
RugglesP., FixM. and ThomasK. M.1985Profile of the Central American Population in the United States.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
67.
SaltJ.1992“The Future of International Labor Migration,”International Migration Review, 26(4):1077–1111.
68.
San Francisco Chronicle1987“Duarte's Plea on Illegal Aliens,”San Francisco Chronicle, 11.
SchneiderA. and IngramH.1993“Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy,”American Political Science Review, 87(2):334–347.
71.
SchneiderA. and IngramH.1988“Systematically Pinching Ideas: A Comparative Approach to Policy Design,”Journal of Public Policy, 8(1):61–80.
72.
SimpsonA. K.1984“The Politics of U.S. Immigration Reform,”International Migration Review, 18(3):486–504.
73.
United States Committee on Refugees1986Despite a Generous Spirit.Washington, DC: American Council for Nationalities Service.
74.
WasemR. E. n.d. “Temporary Protections under U.S. Immigration Law.”Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
75.
WilgorenJ. and McDonnellP. J.1997“House Approves Nicaraguan and Cuban Amnesty,”Los Angeles Times, November 13, A1, A29.
76.
WilsonT. D.1993“Theoretical Approaches to Mexican Wage Labor Migration,”Latin American Perspectives, 20(3):93–129.
77.
YngvessonB.1993Virtuous Citizens, Disruptive Subjects: Order and Complaint in a New England Court.New York: Routledge.
78.
YngvessonB.1988“Making Law at the Doorway: The Clerk, the Court, and the Construction of Community in a New England Town,”Law and Society Review, 22(3):409–448.
79.
ZolbergA. R.1990“The Roots of U.S. Refugee Policy.” In Immigration and U.S. Foreign Policy. Ed. TuckerBoulder, CO: Westview Press.
