This article contains the results of research concerning parliamentary debate about voting rights for foreign residents in the Netherlands (1970–1996) using a discourse analytical framework. Due to the characteristics of the Dutch political field, a large majority of the political actors has to be willing and able to combine political interests and ideological narratives into one story line propagating franchise for foreign residents in order to grant voting rights to nonnationals. It is claimed that the success and failure of policy changes regarding the political participation of nonnationals is foremost determined by the extent of the discursive affinity of argumentative clusters used by parties of the “center-right” with the (leftist) discourse which propagates enfranchisement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbercrombieN., HillS. and TurnerB.1980The Dominant Ideology Thesis.London: Roudedge.
2.
AndewegR. and IrwinG.1993Dutch Government and Politics.London: Macmillan.
3.
BlommaertJ. and VerschuerenJ.1994“The Belgian Migrant Debate,”New Community, 20:227–251.
4.
BourdieuP.1991Language and Symbolic Power.Cambridge: Polity Press.
BrubakerR.1992Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
7.
Caldas-CoulthardC. and CoulthardM.1996Texts and Practices Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis.London: Routledge.
8.
CastlesS.1994“Democracy and Multicultural Citizenship: Australian Debates and Their Relevance for Western Europe.” In From Aliens to Citizens, Redefining the Status of Immigrants in Europe. Ed. BauböckR.Aldershot: Avebury. Pp. 3–27.
9.
DonnerA.1974“Nederlanders in het buitenland en het kiesrecht I,”Nederlands Juristen Blad, 49:726–727.
10.
EllingsonS.1995“Understanding the Dialectic of Discourse and Collective Action: Public Debate and Rioting in Antebellum Cincinnati,”American Journal of Sociology, 101:100–144.
11.
FaircloughN.1995Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language.Essex: Longman.
12.
FaircloughN.1992Discourse and Social Change.Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
FeherF. and HellerA.1994“Naturalization or Culturalization? In From Aliens to Citizens. Redefining the Status of Immigrants in Europe. Ed. BauböckR.Aldershot: Avebury. Pp. 149–186.
14.
FennemaM.1994“Dutch Policy Networks and Discourses in the Decolonization of Indonesia,”Acta Politico, 147–171.
15.
GlaserB. and StraussA.1967The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.New York: Aldine.
16.
GroenendijkC.1986“Von Auslaender zum Mitbuerger: Die symbolische Beduetung des Wahlrechts fuer auslaendische Immigranten in die Niederlanden.” In Kommunales Wahlrecht und Polititische Partizipation fuer Auslander am Beispiel Ausgewaehter Europaeischer Laender. Ed. BammelH. and SenF.Freudenberg: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Pp. 41–63.
17.
HajerM.1993“Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Great Britain.” In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Ed. FischerF. and ForesterJ.London: UCL. Pp. 43–76.
18.
HeijsE.1995Van vreemedeling tot Nederlander. De verlening van het Nederlanderschap aan vreemdelingen 1813–1992.Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
19.
HisschemöllerM.1988“Kiesrecht voor niet-Nederlanders (1970–1980),”Beleid en Maatschappij, 15:32–43.
20.
HodgeR. and KressG.1993Language as Ideology. Second Edition.London: Routledge.
21.
HondiusF., WaldeckP. and WÿsenbeekF.1974“Nederlanders in het buitenland en het kiesrecht,”Nederlands Juristen Blad, 49:480–493.
22.
HoppeR.1993“Political Judgment and the Policy Cycle: The Case of Ethnicity Policy Arguments in the Netherlands.” In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Ed. FischerF. and ForesterJ.London: UCL. Pp. 77–100.
23.
LatourB.1986“The Powers of Association.” In Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? Ed. LawJ.London: Routledge.
24.
RathJ.1990“Voting Rights.” In The Political Rights of Migrant Workers in Western Europe. Ed. Layton-HenryZ.London: Sage. Pp. 127–157.
25.
RoseN. and MillerP.1992“Political Power beyond the State: problematics of government,”British Journal of Sociology, 43:173–205.
26.
SoysalY.1994Limits of Citizenship. Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe.London: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Staatscommissie van advies inzake de Grondwet en de Kieswet1971Eindrapport.Den Haag: SDU.
28.
SteijlenF.1996RMS, van Ideaal tot Symbool. Moluks Nationalisme in Nederland 1951–1994.Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
29.
StraussA. and CorbinJ.1990Basics of Qualitative Research; Grounded Theory, Procedures and Tactics.London: Sage.
30.
TungK.1985“Voting Rights for Alien Residents – Who Wants It?”International Migration Review, 19(3):451–467.
31.
Van den BergH.1995“De arbeidsmarkpositie van etnische minderheden: Het Nederlandse minderhedenbeleid op een kruispunt,”Migrantenstudies, 3:166–179.
32.
Van den BergH.1992“Racismeonderzoek en discours-analyse. Een analyse van Communicating racism (1987) en Racism in the Press (1991) van Teun Van Dijk,”Migrantenstudies, 5:38–60.
33.
Van DijkT.1993Elite Discourse and Racism.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
VermeulenH. and PenninxR.1994Het Democratisch ongeduld. De emancipatie en integratie van zes doelgroepen van het minderhedenbeleid.Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
