A rise in neo-isolationism in the United States has given encouragement to a new fiscal politics of immigration. Growing anti-immigrant sentiment has coalesced with forces of fiscal conservatism to make immigrants an easy target of budget cuts. Limits on legal alien access to social welfare programs that are contained in the 1996 welfare and immigration reform acts seem motivated not so much by a guiding philosophy of what it means to be a member of American society as by a desire to shrink the size of the federal government and to produce a balanced budget. Even more than in the past, the consequence of a shrinking welfare state is to metamorphose legal immigrants from public charges to windfall gains for the federal treasury.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AyresB.D.Jr., 1995a “California Immigration Law is Ruled to be Partly Illegal,” The New York Times, November 21. P. A10.
2.
AyresB.D.Jr., 1995b. “Conservatives Forge New Strategy to Challenge Affirmative Action,” The New York Times, February 16. P. A1.
3.
BerryB. and TischlerH.1978Race and Ethnic Relations. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
4.
BorjasG.J.1994 “The Economics of Immigration,” Journal of Economic Literature, 32(4): 1667–1717. December.
5.
BorjasG.J. and HiltonL.1996 “Immigration and the Welfare State: Immigrant Participation in Means-Tested Entitlement Programs,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111 (2):575–604. May.
6.
ClarkR.L., PasselJ., ZimmermanW. and FixM.1994Fiscal Impacts of Undocumented Aliens: Selected Estimates for Seven States. Report to the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Justice. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
CorneliusW. A1982 “America in the Era of Limits: Nativist Reactions to the ‘New’ Immigration.” Working Papers in U.S.-Mexican Studies, No. 3. San Diego: Center for U.S. Mexican Studies, University of California
9.
CorneliusW. A1997 “Appearances and Realities: Controlling Illegal Immigration in the United States.” In Temporary Workers or Future Citizens: Japan and U.S. Migration Policies. Ed. WeinerM. and HanamiT.London: MacMillan. Pp. 384–427.
10.
CorneliusW.H., MartinP. L. and HollifieldJ.F.1994 “Introduction: The Ambivalent Quest for Immigration Control.” In Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective. Ed. CorneliusW. A., MartinP. L. and HollifieldJ. F.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Pp. 3–41.
11.
DayC.L.1990 “Ethnocentrism, Economic Competition, and Attitudes toward U.S. Immigration Policy.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois, April 5–7.
12.
DunlapJ.C. and MorseA.1995 “States Sue Feds to Recover Immigration Costs,” NCSL Legisbrief, 3(1). Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures.
13.
EspenshadeT.J., BarakaJ. L. and HuberG.A.1997 “Restructuring U.S. Immigration: Implications of the 1996 Welfare and Immigration Reform Acts.” Paper prepared for the Conference on Migration and Restructuring in the United States, University of Georgia, Athens, May 2–4.
14.
EspenshadeT.J. and BelangerM.1997 “Immigration and Public Opinion.” Paper prepared for the Conference on Immigration and the Socio-Cultural Remaking of the North American Space, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, April 10–12.
15.
EspenshadeT.J. and CalhounC.A.1993 “An Analysis of Public Opinion Toward Undocumented Immigration,” Population Research and Policy Review, 12:189–224.
16.
EspenshadeT.J. and CalhounC.A.1992 “Public Opinion Toward Illegal Immigration and Undocumented Migrants in Southern California.” Working Paper No. 92–2. Princeton, NJ: Office of Population Research, Princeton University.
17.
EspenshadeT.J. and HempsteadK.1996 “Contemporary American Attitudes Toward U.S. Immigration,” International Migration Review, 30(2):535–570. Summer.
18.
EspenshadeT.J. and KingV.E.1994 “State and Local Fiscal Impacts of U.S. Immigrants: Evidence from New Jersey,” Population Research and Policy Review, 13:225–256.
19.
FilerR.K.1992 “The Effect of Immigrant Arrivals on Migratory Patterns of Native Workers.” In Immigration and the Work Force: Economic Consequences for the United States and Source Areas. Ed. BorjasG. J. and FreemanR. B.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Pp. 245–269.
20.
FixM. and PasselJ.S.1994Immigration and Immigrants: Setting the Record Straight. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
21.
FixM. and ZimmermanW.1995 “Immigrant Families and Public Policy: A Deepening Divide,” Immigrant Policy Program. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
22.
FragomenA.T.Jr.1997 “The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996: An Overview,” International Migration Review, 31(2)438–460.
23.
FreyW.H.1995 “The New Geography of Population Shifts: Trends toward Balkanization.” In State of the Union - America in the 1990s. Vol. II. Social Trends. Ed. FarleyR.New York: Russell Sage. Pp. 271–334.
24.
FriedbergR. and HuntJ.1995a “Immigration and the Receiving Economy.” Paper prepared for the SSRC conference “ Becoming American/America Becoming: International Migration to the United States,” Sanibel Island, Florida, January 18–21, 1996.
25.
FriedbergR. and HuntJ.1995b “The Impact of Immigrants on Host Country Wages, Employment and Growth,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2):23–44. Spring.
26.
GreenhouseS.1995a “G.O.P. Backs Merging Foreign Policy Agencies,” The New York Times, February 15. P. A8.
27.
GreenhouseS.1995b “It's a Hard Job Saving Foreign Aid (but the Job is Still There),” The New York Times, February 19. P. A18.
28.
HarwoodE.1986a “American Public Opinion and U.S. Immigration Policy.” In “Immigration and American Public Policy,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 487. Ed. SimonR. J.Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Pp. 201–212.
29.
HarwoodE.1986b In Liberty's Shadow: Illegal Aliens and Immigration Law Enforcement. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
30.
HarwoodE.1985 “How Should We Enforce Immigration Law?” In Clamor at the Gates: The New American Immigration. Ed. GlazerN.San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies. Pp. 73–91.
31.
HersheyR. D.Jr.1997 “U.S. Jobless Rate Hits 23-Year Low,” The New York Times, May 3. P. Al.
32.
IsbisterJ.1996The Immigration Debate: Remaking America. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press, Inc.
33.
LegomskyS.H.1994 “Why Citizenship?” Virginia Journal of International Law, 35:279–300.
34.
LewisN.A.1995 “Bill Seeks to End Automatic Citizenship for All Born in the U.S.,” The New York Times, December 14. P. A26.
35.
LivelyK.1995 “Judge Says Cal. Ban on Immigrants Is Not Unconstitutional,” Chronicle of Higher Education, December 1. P. A40.
36.
McDonnellP.J. and EllisV.1996 “Welfare Law Will Allow Wilson to Cut Immigrant Aid,” Los Angeles Times, November 2. P. Al.
37.
MansonD.M., EspenshadeT. J. and MullerT.1985 “Mexican Immigration to Southern California: Issues of Job Competition and Worker Mobility,” The Review of Regional Studies, 15(2):21–33. Spring.
38.
MasseyD.S. and EspinosaK.E.1997 “What's Driving Mexico–U.S. Migration? A Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Analysis,” American Journal of Sociology,. 102(4):939–999. January.
39.
MoehringH.B.1988 “Symbol Versus Substance in Legislative Activity: The Case of Illegal Immigration,” Public Choice, 57:287–294.
40.
MyersS.L.1997 “U.S. May Pay Some Arrears to the U.N.,” The New York Times, June 11. P. A6.
41.
National Conference of State Legislatures1996a “Analysis of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996.” Washington, D.C. August 30.
42.
National Conference of State Legislatures1996b “Immigrant Provisions in Welfare Reform: PL. 104–193.” Washington, DC. September 17.
43.
National Conference of State Legislatures1996c “Welfare Reform Update: Selected Constitutional Issues in Welfare Reform.” Washington, DC.
44.
NobleK.B.1995 “In California, Smuggled Refugees of Golden Venture Protest Long Detention,” The New York Times, December 2. P. A6.
45.
PalleyT.I.1994 “Capital Mobility and the Threat to American Prosperity,” Challenge, 37(6):31–39. November/December.
46.
PalmerD.L.1994 “Anatomy of an Attitude: Origins of the Attitude toward the Level of Immigration to Canada.” Strategic Planning and Research, Immigration Policy, Citizenship and Immigration Canada, February 3.
47.
PapademetriouD.G.1990 “The Immigration Act of 1990.” Washington, DC: Bureau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor.
48.
PasselJ.S.1986 “Undocumented Immigration.” In “Immigration and American Public Policy,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 487. Ed. SimonR. J.Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Pp. 181–200.
49.
PearR.1997 “Budget Agreement Restores Benefits to Some Legal Immigrants,” The New York Times, May 4. P. A30.
50.
PearR.1994 “Deciding Who Gets What in America,” The New York Times, November 27. P. E5.
51.
PlotkinS. and ScheuermanW.E.1994Private Interest, Public Spending: Balanced-Budget Conservatism and the Fiscal Crisis. Boston: South End Press.
52.
ReimersD.M.1985Still the Golden Door: The Third World Comes to America. New York: Columbia University Press.
53.
RosenbaumD.E.1995 “A Budget Debate Not about Dollars, But about Whose Plan Makes Sense,” The New York Times, December 1. P. B12.
54.
RothmanE.S. and EspenshadeT.J.1992 “Fiscal Impacts of Immigration to the United States,” Population Index, 58(3): 381–415. Fall.
55.
SchmittE.1995a “House Votes Bill to Cut U.N. Funds for Peacekeeping,” The New York Times, February 17. P. A1.
56.
SchmittE.1995b “Stage Set for a Showdown on Foreign Policy,” The New York Times, February 15. P. A8. Schuck, P. H.
57.
SchmittE.1996 “Review of Alien Nation,” Yale Law Journal, 105(7):1963–2012. May.
58.
SchmittE.1984 “The Transformation of Immigration Law,” Columbia Law Review, 84:1–90. January.
59.
SimonR.J. and AlexanderS.H.1993The Ambivalent Welcome: Print Media, Public Opinion and Immigration. Westport, CT: Praeger.
60.
SmithJ. P. and EdmonstonB., eds. 1997The New Americans: Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Effects of Immigration. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
61.
SorensenE. and BlasbergN.1996 “The Use of SSI and Other Welfare Programs by Immigrants.” Income and Benefits Policy Center. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
62.
State and Local Coalition on Immigration1995a California State Ballot Initiative on Undocumented Immigrants (Proposition 187). Washington, DC: Immigrant Policy Project.
63.
State and Local Coalition on Immigration1995b “Two More States Pass ‘Official English’ Laws,” Immigrant Policy News… The State-Local Report, 2(1). Washington, D.C. May 12.
64.
State and Local Coalition on Immigration1994a “Justice Department Reimburses States for Imprisoning Illegal Criminal Felons,” Immigrant Policy News…(Inside the Beltway), 1(9). Washington, DC. November 7.
65.
State and Local Coalition on Immigration1994b “Three More States Sue Feds for Costs of Immigration,” Immigrant Policy News… The State-Local Report, 1(2). Washington, DC. November 9.
66.
TeitelbaumM.S. and WeinerM.1995 “Introduction: Threatened Peoples, Threatened Borders: Migration and U.S. Foreign Policy.” In Threatened Peoples, Threatened Borders: World Migration and U.S. Policy. Ed. TeitelbaumM. S. and WeinerM.New York: W.W. Norton and Company. Pp. 13–38.
67.
TienharaN.1974Canadian Views on Immigration and Population: An Analysis of Post-War Gallup Polls. Ottawa: Information Canada.
68.
U.S. Bureau of the Census1997 “The Foreign-Born Population: 1996,” Current Population Reports, March. Pp. 20–494.
69.
U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform1995Legal Immigration: Setting Priorities. 1995 Executive Summary. Washington, DC:
70.
U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform.1994U.S. Immigration Policy: Restoring Credibility. 1994 Executive Summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform.
71.
U.S. General Accounting Office1995a Illegal Aliens: National Net Cost Estimates Vary Widely. HEHS-95-133. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
72.
U.S. General Accounting Office1995b Welfare Reform: Implications of Proposals on Legal Immigrants’ Benefits. HEHS-95-58. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
73.
U.S. General Accounting Office1994Illegal Aliens: Assessing Estimates of Financial Burden on California. HEHS-95-22. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
74.
VernezG. and McCarthyK.1995The Fiscal Costs of Immigration: Analytical and Policy Issues. Center for Research on Immigration Policy, DRU-958-1-IF. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.
75.
WhiteM.J. and HunterL.M.1993 “The Migratory Response of Native-Born Workers to the Presence of Immigrants in the Labor Market.” Working Paper Series 93-08. Providence, RI: Population Studies and Training Center, Brown University.
76.
WhitneyC.R.1996 “Europeans Redefine What Makes a Citizen,” The New York Times, January. P. E6.
