This essay examines some of the pitfalls in contemporary immigration theory and reviews some of the most promising developments in research in this field. As a data-driven field or study, immigration has not had to contend with grand generalizations for highly abstract theorizing. On the contrary, the bias has run in the opposite direction, that is toward ground-level studies of particular migrant groups or analysis of official migration policies. As the distillate of past research in the field and a source of guidance for future work, theory represents one of the most valuable products of our collective intellectual endeavor. Ways to foster it and problems presented by certain common misunderstandings about the meaning and scope of scientific theorizing are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbaR. and NeeV.1997 “Rethinking Assimilation Theory for a New Era of Immigration,” International Migration Review, 31(4).
2.
BaileyT. and WaldingerR.1991 “Primary, Secondary, and Enclave Labor Markets: A Training System Approach,” American Sociological Review, 56:432–445.
3.
BaschL. G., Glick-SchillerN. and Blanc-SzantonC.1994Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects, Post-colonial Predicaments, and Deterritorialized Nation-States. Langhorne, PA: Gordon and Breach.
4.
Body-GentrotS.1995 “Models of Immigrant Integration in France and the United States. In The Bubbling Cauldron: Race, Ethnicity, and the Urban Crisis. Ed. SmithM. P. and FeaginJ.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Pp. 244–262.
5.
BonacichE.1973 “A Theory of Middleman Minorities,” American Sociological Review, 38:583–594.
6.
BonacichE. and ModellJ.1980The Economic Basis of Ethnic Solidarity: Small Business in the Japanese-American Community. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
BrubakerR.1995 “Comment on ‘Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States’,” International Migration Review, 29(4):903–908.
8.
ChildI.1943Italian or American? The Second Generation in Conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
ColemanJ.S.1988 “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital,” American Journal of Sociology, 94:S95–S121.
10.
EdwardsR., ReichR. and GordonD.M.1975Labor Market Segmentation. Lexington, MA.: D.C. Heath.
11.
EnochY.1994 “The Intolerance of a Tolerant People: Ethnic Relations in Denmark,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, 17:282–300.
12.
Fernandez-KellyP. and SchaufflerR.1994 “Divided Fates: Immigrant Children in a Restructured U.S. Economy,” International Migration Review, 28(4):662–689.
13.
FongT.P.1994The First Suburban Chinatown: The Remaking of Monterey Park, California. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
14.
FreemanG.P.1995 “Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States,” International Migration Review, 29(4):881–902.
15.
GansH.1992 “Second-Generation Decline: Scenarios for the Economic and Ethnic Futures of the Post–1965 American Immigrants.” Ethnic and Racial Studies, 15:173–192.
16.
GibsonM.A.1989Accommodation without Assimilation: Sikh Immigrants in an American High School. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
GilbertsonG.A.1995 “Women's Labor and Enclave Employment: The Case of Colombian and Dominican Women in New York City,” International Migration Review, 29(3):657–670.
18.
Glick-SchillerN.1996 “Who are Those Guys? A Transnational Reading of the U.S. Immigrant Experience.” Paper presented at the conference “ Becoming American/America Becoming: International Migration to the United States,” Social Science Research Council, Sanibel Island, Florida, January 18–21.
19.
Glick-SchillerN., BaschL. and Blanc-SzantonC.1992 “Towards a Transnationalization of Migration: Race, Class, Ethnicity, and Nationalism Reconsidered,” The Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 645:24.
20.
GoldringL.1992 “La Migracion Mexico-EUA y la Transnacionalizacion del Espacio Politico y Social: Perspectivas desde el Mexico Rural,” Estudios Sociologicos, 10:315–340.
21.
GordonD.1972Theories of Poverty and Unemployment. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
22.
GordonM.1964Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
GrasmuckS. and PessarP.R.1991Between Two Islands: Dominican International Migration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
GuarnizoL.E.1994 “Los Dominicanyorks: The Making of a Binational Society,” Annuals of the Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 533:70–86.
25.
HandlinO.1972The Uprooted: The Epic Story of the Great Migrations that Made the American People. 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown.
26.
HollifieldJ.F.1996 “The Migration Crisis in Western Europe: The Search for a National Model.” In Migration, Ethnicity, Conflict. Ed. BadeK.Osnabrück, Austria: Universitätsverlag Rasch. Pp. 367–402.
27.
HollifieldJ.F.1994 “Immigration and Republicanism in France.” In Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective. Ed. CorneliusW. A., MartinP. L., and HollifieldJ. F.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Pp. 143–175.
28.
HollifieldJ.F.1992Immigrants, Markets, and States: The Political Economy of Postwar Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS)19961995 Annual Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
30.
KimI.1981New Urban Immigrants: The Korean Community in New YorkPrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
KohnM.L.1987 “Cross-National Research as an Analytic Strategy,” American Sociological Review, 52:713–731.
32.
KrautA.M.1982The Huddled Masses, the Immigrant in American Society, 1880–1921. Arlington Heights, IL: Harlan Davidson.
33.
KurthenH.1995 “Germany at the Crossroads: National Identity and the Challenge of Immigration,” International Migration Review, 29(4):914–938.
34.
KyleD.1995The Transnational Peasant: The Social Structures of Economic Migration from the Ecuadoran Andes. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, The Johns Hopkins University. Baltimore, MD.
35.
LiebersonS.1981Language Diversity and Language Contact. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
LiebersonS. and HansenL.K.1974 “National Development, Mother Tongue Diversity, and the Comparative Study of Nations,” American Sociological Review, 39:523–541.
37.
MailerN.1948The Naked and the Dead. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
38.
MasseyD., AlarcónR., DurandJ. and GonzlezH.1987Return to Atzlán: The Social Process of International Migration from Western Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.
39.
MasseyD.S. and EspinosaK.1996 “What's Driving Mexico-U.S. Migration? A Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Analysis.” Paper presented at the conference “ Becoming American/America Becoming: International Migration to the United States,” Social Science Research Council, Sanibel Island, Florida, January 18–21.
40.
MasseyD.S. and García EspañaF.1987 “The Social Process of International Migration,” Science, 237:733–738.
41.
MasseyD.S. and GoldringL.1994 “Continuities in Transnational Migration: An Analysis of Nineteen Mexican Communities,” American Journal of Sociology, 99:1492–1533.
42.
MertonR.K.1987 “Three Fragments from a Sociologist's Notebook: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials,” Annual Review of Sociology, 13:1–28.
43.
MertonR.K.1968Social Theory and Social Structure. Enlarged ed. New York: Free Press.
44.
MertonR.K.1936 “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action,” American Sociological Review, 1:894–904.
45.
MünzR. and UlrichR.1995 “Changing Patterns of Migration, the Case of Germany, 1945–1994.” Paper presented at the German-American Migration and Refugee Policy Group, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Cambridge, MA, March 23–26.
46.
NagelE.196l The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
47.
NeeV. and de Bary NeeB.1992Longtime Californ’: A Documentary Study of an American Chinatown. New York: Pantheon Books.
48.
PerlmannJ. and WaldingerR.1997 “Second Generation Decline? The Children of Immigrants Past and Present – A Reconsideration,” International Migration Review, 31(4).
49.
PessarP.R.1996 “The Role of Gender, Households, and Social Networks in the Migration Process: A Review and Appraisal.” Paper presented at the conference “Becoming American/America Becoming: International Migration to the United States,” Social Science Research Council, Sanibel Island, Florida, January 18–21.
50.
PioreM.1979Birds of Passage. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
51.
PortesA.1996 “Transnational Communities: Their Emergence and Significance in the Contemporary World-System.” In Latin America in the World Economy. Ed. KorzeniewidczR. P. and SmithW. C.Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Pp. 151–168.
52.
PortesA.1995 “Economic Sociology and the Sociology of Immigration: A Conceptual Overview.” In The Economic Sociology of Immigration. Ed. PortesA.New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Pp. 1–41.
53.
PortesA. and BachR.L.1985Latin Journey: Cuban and Mexican Immigrants in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
54.
PortesA. and RumbautR.G.1996Immigrant America: A Portrait. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.
55.
PortesA. and SensenbrennerJ.1993 “Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action,” American Journal of Sociology, 98:1320–1350.
56.
PortesA. and WaltonJ.1981Labor, Class, and the International System. New York: Academic Press.
57.
PortesA. and ZhouM.1993 “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants among Post–1965 Immigrant Youth,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 530:74–96.
58.
PrzeworskiA. and TeuneH.1970The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger.
59.
PutnamR.D.1993 “The Prosperous Community, Social Capital and Public Life,” The American Prospect, 9:35–42.
60.
RepakT.A.1995Waiting on Washington, Central American Workers in the Nation's Capital. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
61.
RobinsonW.S.1951 “The Logical Structure of Analytic Induction,” American Sociological Review, 16:812–818.
62.
RosenblumG.1973Immigrant Workers: Their Impact on American Radicalism. New York: Basic Books.
63.
SantibáñezE.1930Ensayo acerca de la inmigración mexicana en los Estados Unidos. San Antonio, TX: Clegg.
64.
SassenS.1991The Global City. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
SassenS.1989 “New York City's Informal Economy.” In The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries. Ed. PortesA., CastellsM., and BentonL. A.Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University. Pp. 60–77.
66.
SassenS.1988The Mobility of Labor and Capital, A Study in International Investment and Labor Flows. New York: Cambridge University Press.
67.
SmithR.C.1995Los Ausentes Siempre Presentes: The Imagining, Making, and Politics of a Transnational Community between Ticuaní, Puebla, Mexico and New York City. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, Columbia University. New York.
68.
SmithR.C.1992 “New York in Mixteca: Mixteca in New York,” NACLA Report on the Americas, 26:1.
69.
StepickA.1992 “The Refugees Nobody Wants: Haitians in Miami.” In Miami Now! Ed. GrenierG. J. and StepickA.Gainesville: University of Florida Press. Pp. 57–82.
70.
Suarez-OrozcoM.M.1987 “Towards a Psychosocial Understanding of Hispanic Adaptation to American Schooling.” In Success or Failure? Learning and the Languages of Minority Students. Ed. TruebaH. T.New York: Newbury House Publishers. Pp. 156–168.
71.
ThomasB.1973Migration and Economic Growth: A Study of Great Britain and the Atlantic Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
ThomasW.I. and ZnanieckiF.1984The Polish Peasant in Europe and America 1918–1920. Ed. ZaretskyE.Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
73.
TurnerR.1953 “The Quest for Universals in Sociological Research,” American Sociological Review, 18:604–611.
74.
VeltmanC.1983Language Shift in the United States. Berlin: Mouton.
75.
WatersM.1994 “Ethnic and Racial Identities of Second Generation Black Immigrants in New York City,” International Migration Review, 28(4):795–820.
76.
WhyteW.F.1955Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
77.
WilsonK. and MartinW.A.1982 “Ethnic Enclaves: A Comparison of the Cuban and Black Economies of Miami,” American Journal of Sociology, 88:135–160.
78.
ZhouM.1992New York's Chinatown: The Socioeconomic Potential of an Urban Enclave. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
79.
ZhouM. and BankstonC.L.1994 “Social Capital and the Adaptation of the Second Generation: The Case of Vietnamese Youth in New Orleans,” International Migration Review, 28(4):821–845.
80.
ZolbergA.R.1989 “The Next Waves: Migration Theory for a Changing World,” International Migration Review, 23(3):403–430.
81.
ZolbergA.R., SuhrkeA. and AguayoS.1986 “International Factors in the Formation of Refugee Movements,” International Migration Review, 20(2):151–169.
