There has been an ongoing concern about the productivity of kinship-based immigrants in the U.S. labor market. Despite the policy importance of this issue, little empirical or theoretical attention has been devoted to learning the effect of different admission criteria on immigrants’ economic performance. To estimate the effect of admission criteria on immigrant earnings profiles, we use 1980 census data on individuals matched to Immigration and Naturalization Service information on admission criteria for country-of-origin/year-of-entry immigrant cohorts. We find that nonoccupation-based immigration, most of which is family-based, is associated with lower entry earnings but higher earnings growth than occupation-based immigration. The higher estimated earnings growth is sufficient for nonoccupation-based immigrants to catch up with occupationally admitted immigrants after eleven to eighteen years in the United States.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhmedB. and RobinsonJ. G.1994 “Estimates of Emigration of the Foreign-Born Population: 1980–1990,” Technical Working Paper No. 9, Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Population Division. December.
2.
BaileyT. R.1987Immigrant and Native Workers: Contrasts and Competition.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3.
BakerM. and BenjaminD.1994 “The Role of the Family in Immigrants’ Labor Market Activity: An Evaluation of Alternative Explanations.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Economics Association. May.
4.
BeachC. M. and WorswickC.1993 “Is There a Double-Negative Effect on the Earnings of Immigrant Women?” Canadian Public Policy, 19(1):36–53.
5.
BloomD. E. and GundersonM.1991 “An Analysis of the Earnings of Canadian Immigrants.” In Immigration, Trade, and the Labor Market. Ed. AbowdJ. M. and FreemanR. B.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
6.
BorjasG.1993 “Immigration Policy, National Origin, and Immigrant Skills: A Comparison of Canada and the United States.” In Small Differences That Matter: Labor Markets and Income Maintenance in Canada and the United States. Ed. CardD. and FreemanR.Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 21–44.
7.
BorjasG.1992 “National Origin and the Skills of Immigrants.” In Immigration and the Work Force. Ed. BorjasG. J. and FreemanR. B.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
8.
BorjasG.1985 “Assimilation, Changes in Cohort Quality, and the Earnings of Immigrants,” Journal of Labor Economics, 3:463–489. October.
9.
BorjasG.1982 “The Earnings of Male Hispanic Immigrants in the United States,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 35:343–353. April.
10.
BoydM.1992 “Gender Issues in Immigration and Language Fluency.” In Immigration, Language and Ethnic Issues: Canada and the United States. Ed. ChiswickB.Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute. Pp. 305–372.
11.
BoydM.1976 “Immigration Policies and Trends: A Comparison of Canada and the United States,” Demography, 13:82–102. February.
12.
Bureau of the Census, U.S.1983Census of Population and Housing 1980: Public Use Microdata Samples, Technical Documentation.Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.
13.
ChiswickB. R.1986 “Is the New Immigration Less Skilled than the Old?” Journal of Labor Economics. Pp. 168–192. April.
14.
ChiswickB. R.1979 “The Economic Progress of Immigrants: Some Apparently Universal Patterns.” In Contemporary Economic Problems, 1979. Ed. FellnerW.Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute. Pp. 359–399.
15.
ChiswickB. R.1978 “The Effect of Americanization on the Earnings of Foreign-Born Men,” Journal of Political Economy. Pp. 897–922. October.
16.
Cobb-Clark1993 “Immigrant Selectivity and Wages: The Evidence for Women,” American Economic Review. Pp. 986–993. September.
17.
DuleepH. O.1994 “Social Security and the Emigration of Immigrants,” Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 57(1):37–52. Spring.
18.
DuleepH. O.1988The Economic Status of Americans of Asian Descent: An Exploratory Investigation.Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Government Printing Office.
19.
DuleepH. O. and RegetsM. C.1996a “Family Unification, Siblings, and Skills.” In Immigrants and Immigration Policy: Individual Skills, Family Ties, and Group Identities. Ed. DuleepH. and WunnavaP.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
20.
DuleepH. O. and RegetsM. C.1996b “Earnings Convergence: Does it Matter Where Immigrants Come From or Why?” Canadian Journal of Economics, 29:S130–S134. April.
21.
DuleepH. O. and RegetsM. C.1996c “The Elusive Concept of Immigrant Quality: Evidence from 1970–1990.” Program for Research on Immigration Policy, Discussion Paper PRIP-UI-41. Washington DC: The Urban Institute.
22.
DuleepH. O. and RegetsM. C.1994a “The Elusive Concept of Immigrant Quality.” Program for Research on Immigration Policy, Discussion Paper PRIP-UI-28. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
23.
DuleepH. O. and RegetsM. C.1994b “Country of Origin and Immigrant Earnings.” Program for Research on Immigration Policy, Discussion Paper PRIP-UI-31. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
24.
DuleepH. O. and RegetsM. C.1992 “Some Evidence on the Effect of Admission Criteria on Immigrant Assimilation.” In Immigration, language and Ethnic Issues: Canada and the United States. Ed. ChiswickB.Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute. Pp. 410–439.
25.
DuleepH. O., RegetsM. C. and SandersS. n.d. Skills, Investment, and Family Ties: A Study of Asian Immigrants, Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute of Employment Research. Forthcoming.
26.
DuleepH. O. and SandersS.1993 “The Decision to Work by Married Immigrant Women” Industrial and Labor Relations Review. Pp. 677–690. July.
27.
EriksonC.1972Invisible Immigrants: The Adaptation of English and Scottish Immigrants in 19th Century America, Miami, FL: University of Miami Press.
28.
FabricantR. A.1970 “An Expectational Model of Migration,” Journal of Regional Science, 10:13–24.
29.
GalloC. and BaileyT.1996 “Social Networks and Skills-Based Immigration Policy.” In Immigrants and Immigration Policy: Individual Skills, Family Ties, and Group Identities. Ed. DuleepH. and WunnavaP.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
30.
GoldfarbR. S.1982 “Occupational Preferences in the U.S. Immigration Law: An Economic Analysis.” In The Gateway: U.S. Immigration Issues and Policies. Ed. ChiswickB. R.Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
31.
GordonL. W.1994 “Highlights of the Triennial Report on Immigration: A Background for Policy Formation.” Paper presented at the 1994 Population Association of America “United States Immigration – Dynamics and Policy Implications” session.
32.
GreenwoodM. J.1969 “An Analysis of the Determinants of Geographic Labor Mobility in the United States,” Review of Economics and Statistics. Pp. 189–194. May.
33.
JassoG. and RosenzweigM. R.1995 “Do Immigrants Screened for Skills Do Better than Family Reunification Immigrants?” International Migration Review, 29(1):85–111.
34.
LalondeR. J. and TopelR. H.1991 “Immigrants in the American Labor Market: Quality, Assimilation, and Distributional Effects,” The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, May.
35.
LansingJ. B. and MuellerE.1967The Geographic Mobility of Labor. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
36.
LowellB. L.1996 “Skilled and Family-Based Immigration: Principles and Labor Markets.” In Immigrants and Immigration Policy: Individual Skills, Family Ties, and Group Identities. Ed. DuleepH. and WunnavaP.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
37.
NelsonP.1959 “Migration, Real Income and Information,” Journal of Regional Science. Pp. 43–74. Spring.
38.
NgoH. Y.1994 “The Economic Role of Immigrant Wives in Hong Kong,” International Migration, September. Pp. 403–423.
39.
PapademetriouD. G.1992 “International Migration in North America: Issues, Policies, and Implications.” U.S. Department of Labor, Immigration Policy and Research Working Paper No. 14.
40.
PioreM. J.1979Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
PortesA. and BachR. L.1985Latin Journey: Cuban and Mexican Immigrants in the United States, Berkeley: University of California Press.
42.
SorensonE., BeanF. D., KuL. and ZimmermannW.1992Immigrant Categories and the U.S. Job Market, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
43.
WaldingerR.1989 “Structural Opportunity or Ethnic Advantage? Immigrant Business Development in New York,” International Migration Review, 23(1):48–72.
44.
WaldingerR.1986Through the Eye of the Needle: Immigrant Enterprise in New York's Garment Trades, New York: New York University Press.
