In a multicultural society, different groups entertain different conceptions of the good life. The wider society cannot be expected indiscriminately to tolerate all kinds of minority practices, nor can it justifiably ban all practices that diverge from its own. This raises the question as to how it should decide which practices to tolerate and which ones to ban. The appeal to such principles as the society's fundamental values, human rights, and no-harm runs into difficulties. This paper suggests that the principles of toleration cannot be laid down in advance, and are best elicited by means of an open-minded intercommunal dialogue aimed at evolving a reasonable consensus.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CligentR.1970Many Wives, More Powers: Authority and Power in Polygamous Families. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
2.
GbadegesinS.1993“The Ethics of Polygymy,”Quest: Philosophical Discussions, 7(2).
3.
Koso-ThomasO.1987The Circumcision of Women. London: Zed Books.
4.
KymlickaW.1995Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5.
ParekhB.1995a “The Concept of National Identity,”New Community, 21(2). April.
6.
ParekhB.1995b “Cultural Pluralism and the Limits of Diversity,”Alternatives, 20. November.
7.
ParekhB.1994“Discourses on National Identity,”Political Studies, 42(3). September.
8.
ParekhB.1993“The Cultural Particularity of Liberal Democracy.”In Prospects for Democracy. Ed. HeldD.Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
United Nations1995Harmful Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children. Fact Sheet No. 23. New York: United Nations.
